Advertisement

Conclusion: Changes and Continuity

  • Anna Bellavitis
Chapter

Abstract

The chapter concludes on the continuities and changes of women’s work. Research on wages show that, in the past as today, women’s wages were inferior to men’s wages, a part from the least paid sectors. The care and reproduction work done by women in the home was never quantified, and even today the statistics on GDP in EU countries include the production and trafficking of drugs, but not unpaid care and domestic work. The competition between men and women on the labour market is a very long-term issue.

References

  1. Ago, R. (1998). Economia barocca. Mercato e istituzioni nella Roma del Seicento. Rome: Donzelli.Google Scholar
  2. Barker, H. (2006). The Business of Women. Female Enterprise and Urban Development in Northern England, 1760–1830. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Earle, P. (1989). The Female Labour Market in London in the Late Seventeenth and Early Eighteenth Centuries. Economic History Review, 42(3), 328–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Erickson, A. M. (2008). Married Women’s Occupations in Eighteenth-Century London. Continuity and Change, 23(2), 267–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Garden, M. (1970). Lyon et les Lyonnais au XVIIIe siècle. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
  6. Humphries, J., & Weisdorf, J. (2015). The Wages of Women in England, 1260–1850. The Journal of Economic History, 75(2), 405–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Karpinski, A. (1990). The Woman on the Market Place. The Scale of Feminization of Retail Trade in Polish Towns in the Second Half of the 16th and the 17th Century. In S. Cavaciocchi (Ed.), La donna nell’economia, secc. XIII–XVIII, Atti delle Settimane di studi dell’Istituto internazionale di Storia economica F. Datini di Prato (pp. 283–292). Florence: Le Monnier.Google Scholar
  8. Kelly, J. (1977). Did Women have a Renaissance ? In R. Bridenthal & C. Koonz (Eds.), Becoming Visible, Women in European History (pp. 21–47). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  9. López Barahona, V. (2016). Las trabajadoras en la sociedad madrileña del siglo XVIII. Madrid: ACCI.Google Scholar
  10. Luyssen, J. (2016). Quand “le Figaro” renvoie les femmes à la maison. http://www.liberation.fr/france/2016/03/24/quand-le-figaro-renvoie-lesfemmes-a-la-maison_1441692
  11. Montenach, A. (2015). Creating a Space for Themselves on the Urban Market: Survival Strategies and Economic Opportunities for Single Women in French Provincial Towns (Seventeenth-Eighteenth Centuries). In J. De Groot, I. Devos, & A. Schmidt (Eds.), Single Life and the City 1200–1900 (pp. 50–68). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Palazzi, M. (1990). “Tessitrici, serve, treccole”. Donne, lavoro e famiglia a Bologna nel Settecento. In S. Cavaciocchi (Ed.), La donna nell’economia, secc. XIII–XVIII, Atti delle Settimane di studi dell’Istituto internazionale di Storia economica F. Datini di Prato (pp. 359–376). Florence: Le Monnier.Google Scholar
  13. Phillips, N. (2006). Women in Business, 1700–1850. Woodbridge: Boydell.Google Scholar
  14. Plebani, T. (2008). Socialità e protagonismo femminile nel secondo Settecento. In N. M. Filippini (Ed.), Donne sulla scena pubblica. Società e politica a Venezia tra Settecento e Ottocento (pp. 25–80). Milan: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
  15. Poni, C. (1996). Tecnologie, organizzazione produttiva e divisione sessuale del lavoro: il caso dei mulini da seta. In A. Groppi (Ed.), Il lavoro delle donne (pp. 269–296). Rome/Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
  16. Pullan Brian, B. (1964). Wage-Earners and the Venetian Economy, 1550–1630. The Economic History Review, 16(3), 407–442.Google Scholar
  17. Ramiro Moya, F. (2012). Mujeres y trabajo en la Zaragoza del siglo XVIII. Zaragoza: Prensas Universitarias de Zaragoza.Google Scholar
  18. Rey Castelao, O. (2010). Trabajando a cubierto. Mélanges de la Casa de Velázquez, 40(2). http://mcv.revues.org/3575
  19. Schmidt, A., & van Nederveen Meerkerk, E. (2012). Reconsidering the “First Male-Breadwinner Economy”: Women’s Labor Force Participation in the Netherlands, 1600–1900. Feminist Economics, 18(4), 69–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Skora, S. (2015). Héritières et pionnières: les femmes et le livre à Rouen à l’époque moderne. In A. Bellavitis, V. Jourdain, V. Lemonnier-Lesage, & B. Zucca Micheletto (Eds.), «Tout ce qu’elle saura et pourra faire», Femmes, droits, travail en Normandie du Moyen Âge à la Grande Guerre (pp. 67–82). Mont Saint Aignan: Presses Universitaires de Rouen et du Havre.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. van der Heuvel, D. (2007). Women and Entrepreneurship. Female Traders in the Northern Netherlands, 1580–1815. Amsterdam: Askant.Google Scholar
  22. van Nederveen Meerkerk, E. (2008). Couples Cooperating? Dutch Textile Workers, Family Labour and the ‘Industrious Revolution’, c. 1600–1800. Continuity and Change, 23, 237–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. van Nederveen Meerkerk, E. (2010). Market Wage or Discrimination? The Remuneration of Male and Female Wool Spinners in the Seventeenth-Century Dutch Republic. Economic History Review, 63(1), 165–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wiesner, M. E. (1996). Gender and the Worlds of Work. In B. Scribner (Ed.), Germany. A New Social and Economic History, vol. 1, 1450–1630 (pp. 209–232). London/New York/Sidney/Auckland: Arnold.Google Scholar
  25. Wiesner, M. E. (2008). Do Women Need the Renaissance? Gender & History, 20(3), 539–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zucca Micheletto, B. (2008). Lavoro, figli ed economia domestica nella Torino di Antico Regime. Genesis, VII(1–2), 165–192.Google Scholar
  27. Zucca Micheletto, B. (2013). Reconsidering Women’s Labor Force Participation Rates in Eighteenth-Century Turin. Feminist Economics, 19(4), 200–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna Bellavitis
    • 1
  1. 1.University of RouenRouenFrance

Personalised recommendations