Advertisement

Thermal Conversions of Biomass

  • Basanta Kumara Behera
  • Ajit Varma
Chapter

Abstract

Wood remains the largest biomass energy source today; examples include forest residues (such as dead trees, branches and tree stumps), yard clippings, woodchips and even municipal solid waste. Wood energy is derived by using lignocellulosic biomass (second-generation biofuels) as fuel. The estimated biomass production in the world is 104.9 petagrams (104.9 × 1015 g – about 105 billion metric tons) of carbon per year, about half in the ocean and half on land [1].

References

  1. 1.
    Field, CB et al (1998), Primary Production of the Biosphere: Integrating Terrestrial and Oceanic Components. Science, 281(5374): 237–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    Jameel, H et al (2010). Thermochemical Conversion of Biomass to Power and Fuels. In: Biomass to Renewable Energy Processes, Cheng, J. (ed), CRC Press, Florida, 447–487.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Haque, N et al (2008). Survey of sustainable biomass for the iron and steel industry. Proceedings of the CSRP Conference 2008, Brisbane 17-19 November.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    International Energy Agency (2002). Biomass Combustion and Confiring. Bioenergy Agreement Task 32, Amsterdam, Netherlands.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ausilio Bauen et al (2009). Bioenergy – A Sustainable and Reliable Energy Source: 04 A review of status and prospects. IEA Bioenergy Annual Report, International Energy Agency.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    IRENA (2013). Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2012: An Overview. IRENA, Bonn. IRENA 4.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Olofsson, I et al (2005). Initial review and evaluation of process technologies and systems suitable for cost-efficient medium-scale gasification for biomass to liquid fuels.Tech. Rep., Energy Technology & Thermal Process Chemistry, University of Umea.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/coalpower/gasification/pubs Overview of DOE’s Gasification Program, U.S. Department of Energy, Gasification Technologies.
  10. 10.
    Yoon, H et al (1978). A model for moving bed coal gasification reactors, AIChE Journal, 24(5): 885–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Boerrigter, H et al (2004). Biosyngas: Markets, production technologies, and production concepts for biomass-based syngas. ECN-report, Petten, The Netherlands, ECN-CX-04-013.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Calis, HPA et al. (2002). Technical and economic feasibility of large scale synthesis gas production in the Netherlands from imported biomass feedstock, SDE, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Basu, P and Mettanant, V (2009). Biomass gasification in supercritical water—A review. Int. J. Chem. React. Eng., 7: 1–61.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Matsumura, Y and Minowa, T (2004). Fundamental design of a continuous biomass gasification process using a supercritical water fluidized bed. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 29: 701–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Amin, S et al (1975). Reforming and decomposition of glucose in an aqueous phase. In: Proceedings of the Intersociety Conference on Environmental Systems, San Francisco CA, USA, 21–24 July 1975.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Barner, HE et al (1992). Supercritical water oxidation: An emerging technology. J. Hazard. Mater., 31, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Peterson, AA et al (2008). Thermochemical biofuel production in hydrothermal media: A review of sub- and supercritical water technologies. Energy Environ. Sci., 1: 32–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tang, H et al (2013). Development of plasma pyrolysis/gasification for energy efficient and environmentally sound waste disposal, J. Electrost., 71: 839–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Janajreh, SS et al (2013). Plasma gasification process: Modeling, simulation and comparison with conventional air gasification. Energy Convers. Manage., 65: 801–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhang, L et al (2010). Overview of recent advances in thermo-chemical conversion of biomass. Energy Convers. Manage., 51: 969–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kalinci, Y et al (2011). Exergoeconomic analysis of hydrogen production from plasma gasification of sewage sludge using specific exergy cost method. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 36: 11408–11417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mountouris, A et al (2008). Plasma gasification of sewage sludge: Process development and energy optimization. Energy Convers. Manage., 49: 2264–2271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rutberg, A et al (2011). Plasma gasification of organic containing substances as a promising way of development of alternative renewable power engineering. Biomass Bioenergy, 35: 495–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shie, JL et al (2010). Steam plasmatron gasification of distillers grains residue from ethanol production. Bioresour. Technol., 101: 5571–5577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tang, L et al (2013). Development of plasma pyrolysis/gasification systems for energy efficient and environmentally sound waste disposal. Elsevier, Journal of Electrostatistics, 71: 839–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jameel, H et al (2010). Thermochemical Conversion of Biomass to Power and Fuels. In: Biomass to Renewable Energy Processes. Cheng, J. (ed.), CRC Press, Florida.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Roos, C et al (2010). Clean Heat and Power Using Biomass Gasification for Industrial and Agricultural Projects. U.S. Department of Energy.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Antal, MJ and Grønli, M (2003). The art, science and technology of charcoal production. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 42 (8): 1619–1640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lievens, C et al (2009) Fast pyrolysis of heavy metal contaminated willow: Influence of the plant part. Fuel, 88: 1417–1425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Peter Alexander, B. (2009). Biomass Pyrolysis Processes: Performance Parameters and their Influence on Biochar System Benefits. A dissertation presented for the degree of Master of Science, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    http://www.fzk.de/fzk/groups/itc-tab/documents/internetdokument Mai R et al (2008). Hot gas filtration and Haloclean ® process operation experience and scale-up. 7th International Symposium on Gas Cleaning at High Temperatures.
  32. 32.
    Brown, R (2009). Biochar Production Technology. In: J. Lehmann and S. Joseph (eds), Biochar for Environmental Management. Earthscan, London.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Henrich, E (2007). The Status of the FZK Concept of Biomass Gasification. 2nd European Summer School on Renewable Motor Fuels, Warsaw, Poland.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    http://www.bestenergies.com/companies/bestpyrolysis.html 12.08.09 BEST Energies Inc. (2009). BEST Energies web site. Wisconsin, USA.
  35. 35.
    Downie, A et al (2007). Slow pyrolysis: Australian demonstration plant successful on multi-feedstocks. Bioenergy 2007 Conference, Finland.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    http://www.pronatura.org/archives/200812_GreenCharcoal_en.pdf 15.08.09 Pro-Natura. (2008). Fighting climate change with green charcoal and increasing agricultural productivity. Newsletter December 2008. Pro-Natura, Paris.
  37. 37.
    Ensyn Corporation (2009). Ensyn Corporation web site. Ensyn Corporation, Wilmington, Delaware, USA. http://www.ensyn.com/tech.htm 17.08.09.
  38. 38.
    http://www.biooil.ru/docs/1999OaklandBiomassPaper.pdf 15.08.09. Dynamotive Energy Systems Corporation. (1999). BioTherm™ – A system for continuous quality, fast pyrolysis biooil. Fourth Biomass Conference of the Americas.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bridgwater, AV (1999). An overview of fast pyrolysis of biomass. Organic Geochemistry, 30: 1479–1493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Bridgwater, AV and Peacocke, GVC (2000). Fast Pyrolysis Processes for Biomass. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 4: 1–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Miura, M et al (2004). Rapid pyrolysis of wood block by microwave heating. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis, 71: 187–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Chen, MQ et al (2008). Catalytic effects of eight inorganic additives on pyrolysis of pine wood sawdust by microwave heating. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis, 82: 145–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wang, XH (2008). The influence of microwave drying on biomass pyrolysis. Energy Fuels, 22: 67–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Huang, YF et al (2008). Total recovery of resources and energy from rice straw using microwave-induced pyrolysis. Bioresour Technol, 99: 8252–8258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Lei, HW et al (2009). The effects of reaction temperature and time and particle size of corn stover on microwave pyrolysis. Energy Fuels, 23: 3254–3261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Wan, YQ et al (2009). Microwave-assisted pyrolysis of biomass: Catalysts to improve product selectivity. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis, 86: 161–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Budarin, L et al. (2009). The preparation of high-grade bio-oils through the controlled, low temperature microwave activation of wheat straw. Bioresour Technol, 100: 6064–6068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Zhao, XQ (2012). A microwave reactor for characterization of pyrolyzed biomass. Bioresour Technol, 104: 673–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Salema, AA and Anil, FN (2011). Microwave induced pyrolysis of oil palm biomass. Bioresour Technol, 102: 3388–3395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Bu, Q et al (2011). Phenol and phenolics from lignocellulosic biomass by catalytic microwave pyrolysis. Bioresour Technol, 102: 7004–7007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Zhou Rand et al (2013). The effects of pyrolytic conditions on microwave pyrolysis of prairie cordgrass and kinetics. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis, 101: 172–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Zhang, SP et al (2015). High quality syngas production from microwave pyrolysis of rice husk with char-supported metallic catalysts. Bioresour Technol, 191: 17–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Zhang, ZR et al (2015). Low-temperature microwave-assisted pyrolysis of waste office paper and the application of bio-oil as an Al adhesive. Green Chem, 17: 260–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    A Study of a Biomass Liquefaction Test Facility. Final Report of IEA Cooperative Project, Biomass Liquefaction Test Facility, Kjellström, B. (ed.) 1985 Statens Energiverk R:1, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Goudriaan, F and Peferoen, DGR (1990). Liquid fuels from biomass via a hydrothermal process. Chemical Engineering Science, 45(8): 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Ramirez Jerome et al (2015) A Review of Hydrothermal Liquefaction Bio-Crude Properties and Prospects for Upgrading to Transportation Fuels. Energies, 8(7): 6765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Berl, E (1944) Production of Oil from Plant Material. Science, 99(2573): 309–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Toor, SS et al (2011). Hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass: A review of subcritical water technologies. Energy, 36: 2328–2342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Sergios Karatzos et al (2014). The Potential and Challenges of Drop-in Biofuels. A report by IEA Bioenergy Task 39.
  60. 60.
    McKeough P et al (1985). Techno-economic assessment of direct biomass liquefaction processes. Final Report of IEA Cooperative Project Biomass Liquefaction Test Facility. VTT Research Report 337. Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Solantausta, Y et al (1992). Assessment of liquefaction and pyrolysis systems. Biomass Bioenergy, 2(1–6): 279–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Merrow, E et al (1979). A review of cost estimation in new technologies: Implications for energy process plants. RAND-R-2481-DOE.RAND Corporation for the U.S. Department of Energy, Santa Monica, CA.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Merrow, E et al (1981). Understanding cost growth and performance shortfalls in pioneer process plants. R-2569-DOE, RAND Corporation for the U.S. Department of Energy, Santa Monica, CA.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Holmgren, J et al (2008). Consider upgrading pyrolysis oils into renewable fuels. Hydrocarbon Processing, 2008(Sep): 95–103.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Jone, SB et al (2009). Production of gasoline and diesel from biomass via fast pyrolysis, hydrotreating and hydrocracking: A design case. PNNL-18284, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Wright, M. et al (2010). Techno-economic analysis of biomass fast pyrolysis to transportation fuels. Fuel, 89: S2–S10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Vertes, AA and Qureshi, N (2010). Flowed easily and were much less viscous than the biocrudes of Blaschek, H.P., Yukawa, H. Biomass to Biofuels: Strategies for Global Industries. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Kruse, A and Dinjus, E (2007). Hot compressed water as reaction medium and reactant: Properties and synthesis reactions. J. Supercrit. Fluid, 39: 362–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Liu, Y et al (2013). Thermochemical liquefaction of rice husk for bio-oil production in mixed solvent (ethanol–water). Fuel Process. Technol., 112: 93–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Zheng, C et al (2013). Distribution and characterization of liquefaction of celluloses in sub- and super-critical ethanol. Bioresour., 8: 648–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Duan, P. and Savage, P.E., 2011. Hydrothermal liquefaction of a Microalga with heterogeneous catalyst. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 50: 52–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Brown et al (2010). Hydrothermal liquefaction and gasification of Nannochloropsis sp. Energy Fuels, 24(6): 3639–3646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Irem Deniz Ozlem and Yesil-Celiktas (2015). Hydrogen production from marine biomass by hydrothermal gasification. Energy Conversion and Management, 96: 124–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Tang, HQ and Kuniyuki, K (2005). Supercritical water gasification of biomass: Thermodynamic analysis with direct Gibbs free energy minimization. Chem. Eng. J., 106: 261–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Osada, M et al (2006). Catalytic gasification of wood biomass in subcritical and supercritical water. Combust. Sci. Technol., 178: 537–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Takuya, Y and Yoshito, O (2004). Partial oxidative and catalytic biomass gasification in supercritical water: A promising flow reactor system. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 43: 4097–4104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Masaru, W et al (2003). Catalytic effects of NaOH and ZrO2 for partial oxidative gasification of n-hexadecane and lignin in supercritical water. Fuel, 82: 545–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Wright, Mark M (2010). Techno-Economic Analysis of Biomass Fast Pyrolysis to Transportation Fuels. Technical Report NREL/TP-6A20-46586, Prepared under Task No. BB07.7510.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Anolso et al (2010). Catalytical conversion of biomass to biofuel. Green Chemistry, 12: 1493–1513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Capital Publishing Company, New Delhi, India 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Basanta Kumara Behera
    • 1
  • Ajit Varma
    • 1
  1. 1.Amity UniversityAmity Institute of Microbial TechnologyNoidaIndia

Personalised recommendations