Advertisement

Population Matters: Listening to Past Experiences and Future Aspirations Regarding Risks and Adaptation Actions

  • Roberto GrecoEmail author
  • Lucí Hidalgo Nunes
Chapter

Abstract

Successful adaptation to climate change needs the involvement of the local population. Thus, to identify individual’s perception of climate-change-driven sea-level rise, to know whether individuals recognise climate change as a priority and to observe their willingness to bear the costs for implementing adaptation measures, pre- and post-surveys were applied in two stakeholder engagement meetings in Santos, in Sep. and Dec. 2015. Attendees of both engagement meetings were invited to answer a survey on individual and community risk experience, funding preferences for adopting adaptation measures, and their perceptions about barriers to implement adaptation. Results showed different viewpoints and even antagonistic interests: on the one hand those focused on environmental conservation and on the other, interests focused on urban expansion, increase of port operations, and of tourism and commercial activities. A pro-environmental pattern was identified, but some contradictions have also emerged: participants consider that high wind storms is the most preoccupant hazard for their own houses but not to the city as a whole; they also recognise the urgency of the matter, but do not seem willing to support adaptation measures by new taxes or fees.

Keywords

Adaptation Perception Survey Stakeholder engagement 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Samuel Merrill, Jack Kartez, Catherine J. Reynolds, Karen Langbehn and Frank Muller-Karger (US Metropole Project), for the support given to the analyses and for providing the manuscript entitled: Identifying Stakeholder Values and Priorities for Adaptation Planning and Finance: A Florida Case Study (not published).

References

  1. Adger, W. N., Dessai, S., Goulden, M., et al. (2009). Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change? Climatic Change, 93, 335–335.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-008-9520-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bechtel, B. T., Verdugo, B. C., & Pinheiro J de, Q. (1999). Environmental belief systems. United States, Brazil and Mexico. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 122–128.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022199030001008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Catalysis Adaptation Partners, LLC. (2015). COastal Adaptation to Sea-level rise Tool (COAST) version 3.0. Catalysis Adaptation Partners, LLC, South Portland, ME, licensed through GEI Consultants, Inc.Google Scholar
  4. Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., et al. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 425–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2014). Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change.Google Scholar
  6. Marengo, J. A., Nunes, L. H., Souza, C. R. G., et al. (2017a). A globally deployable strategy for co-development of adaptation preferences to sea-level rise: The public participation case of Santos, Brazil. Natural Hazards, 88, 39–53.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-2855-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Marengo, J. A., Nunes, L. H., Souza, C. R. G., et al. (2017b). Vulnerability in Brazilian coastal communities: An integrated framework to analyze local decision making and adaptation to sea-level rise in Santos, Sao Paulo – Brazil. In: V. Marchezini, B. Wisner, & L. Londe, et al. (Eds.) Reduction of vulnerability to disasters: From knowledge to action (pp. 397–408). https://preventionroutes.weebly.com/capiacutetuloschapters.html. Accessed 12 Sept 2017.
  8. Martín-Vide, J. (2001). Algunas reflexiones y ejemplos del valor de la percepción ambiental en la planificación territorial y de actividades. Revista de Desenvolvimento Econômico, 3, 61–65.Google Scholar
  9. Ross, E., Shaw, S., Rissik, D., et al. (2015). A participatory systems approach to understanding climate adaptation needs. Climatic Change, 129, 27–42.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1318-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. The Berkshire Encyclopedia of Sustainability. (2012). Measurements, indicators, and research methods for sustainability. New Ecological Paradigm (NEP) scale, 6, 260–262.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of GeosciencesUniversity of Campinas (Unicamp)CampinasBrazil
  2. 2.SantosSão PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations