Advertisement

TRIZ-Based Approach for Process Intensification and Problem Solving in Process Engineering: Concepts and Research Agenda

  • Didier Casner
  • Pavel LivotovEmail author
  • Mas’udah
  • Patricia Kely da Silva
Chapter

Abstract

Process engineering (PE) focuses on the design, operation, control and optimization of chemical, physical and biological processes and has applications in many industries. Process intensification (PI) is the key development approach in the modern process engineering. The theory of inventive problem solving (TRIZ) is today considered as the most comprehensive and systematically organized invention knowledge and creative thinking methodology. This paper analyses the opportunities of TRIZ application in PE and especially in combination with PI. In this context the paper outlines the major challenges for TRIZ application in PE, conceptualizes a possible TRIZ-based approach for process intensification and problem solving in PE, and defines the corresponding research agenda. It also presents the results of the original empirical innovation research in the field of solid handling in the ceramic industry, demonstrates a method for identification and prediction of contradictions and introduces the concept of the probability of contradiction occurrence. Additionally, it describes a technique of process mapping that is based on the function and multi-screen analysis of the processes. This technique is illustrated by a case study dealing with granulation process. The research work presented in this paper is a part of the European project “Intensified by Design® platform for the intensification of processes involving solids handling”.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the European Commission for supporting their work as part of the research project “Intensified by Design® platform for the intensification of processes involving solids handling” within international consortium under H2020 SPIRE program.

References

  1. 1.
    Cavallucci D, Cascini G, Duflou J et al (2015) TRIZ and knowledge-based innovation in science and industry. Procedia Eng 131:1–2.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    VDI (2016) VDI standard 4521. Inventive problem solving with TRIZ. Fundamentals, terms and definitions. BerlinGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Altshuller GS (1984) Creativity as an exact science. The theory of the solution of inventive problems. Gordon & Breach Science Publishers, Amsterdam ISSN 0275-5807Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cortes Robles G, Negny S, Le Lann JM (2009) Case-based reasoning and TRIZ: a coupling for innovative conception in chemical engineering. Chem Eng Process Process Intensif 48:239–249.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2008.03.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Houssin R, Renaud J, Coulibaly A et al (2014) TRIZ theory and case based reasoning: synergies and oppositions. Int J Interact Des Manuf (IJIDeM) 9:177–183.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-014-0252-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pokhrel C, Cruz C, Ramirez A et al (2015) Adaptation of TRIZ contradiction matrix for solving problems in process engineering. Chem Eng Res Des 103:3–10.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2015.10.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Srinivasan R, Kraslawski A (2006) Application of the TRIZ creativity enhancement approach to design of inherently safer chemical processes. Chem Eng Process Process Intensif 45:507–514.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2005.11.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kim J, Kim J, Lee Y et al (2009) Application of TRIZ creativity intensification approach to chemical process safety. J Loss Prev Process Ind 22:1039–1043.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2009.06.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Abramov O, Kogan S, Mitnik-Gankin L et al (2015) TRIZ-based approach for accelerating innovation in chemical engineering. Chem Eng Res Des 103:25–31.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2015.06.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rahim ZA, Sheng ILS, Nooh AB (2015) TRIZ methodology for applied chemical engineering: a case study of new product development. Chem Eng Res Des 103:11–24.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2015.08.027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Barragan Ferrer J, Negny S, Cortes Robles G et al (2012) Eco-innovative design method for process engineering. Comput Chem Eng 45:137–151.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2012.06.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yakovis L, Chechurin L (2015) Creativity and heuristics in process control engineering. Chem Eng Res Des 103:40–49.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2015.07.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Berdonosov VD, Kozlita AN, Zhivotova AA (2015) TRIZ evolution of black oil coker units. Chem Eng Res Des 103:61–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Totobesola-Barbier M, Marouz’ C, Giroux F (2002) A TRIZ-based creativity tool for food processing equipment design. TRIZ J. https://triz-journal.com/triz-based-creativity-tool-food-processing-equipment-design/. Accessed 20 Dec 2017
  15. 15.
    Grierson B, Fraser I, Morrison A et al (2003) 40 principles – chemical illustrations. TRIZ J. https://triz-journal.com/40-principles-chemical-illustrations/. Accessed 20 Dec 2017
  16. 16.
    Hipple J (2005) 40 inventive principles for chemical engineering. TRIZ J. https://triz-journal.com/40-inventive-principles-for-chemical-engineering/. Accessed 20 Dec 2017
  17. 17.
    Cascini G, Rotini F, Russo D (2009) Functional modeling for TRIZ-based evolutionary analyses. In: Proceedings of ICED 09, the 17th international conference on engineering design, vol 5. Design Methods and Tools, Palo Alto, CA 24–27 Aug 2009. ISBN 978-1-904670-09-4Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kraslawski A, Rong BG, Nyström L (2000) Creative design of distillation flowsheets based on theory of solving inventive problems. Comput Aided Chem Eng 8:625–630.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1570-7946(00)80106-6 (Elsevier)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Poppe G, Gras B (2001) TRIZ in the process industry. In: Proceedings of the international conference “TRIZ Future 2001”, Bath UK, 7–9 Nov 2001, pp. 44–56, ISBN 90–77071–01-6Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Li XN, Rong BG, Kraslawski A (2001) TRIZ-based creative retrofitting of complex distillation processes - an industrial case study. Comput Aided Chem Eng 9:439–444.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1570-7946(01)80068-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Reay D, Ramshaw C, Harvey A (2013) Process intensification (Second edition). Butterworth-Heinemann, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gerven TV, Stankiewicz AI (2009) Structure, energy, synergy, time - the fundamentals of process intensification. Ind Eng Chem Res 48(5):2465–2474.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ie801501yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stankiewicz AI, Moulijn JA (2000) Process intensification: transforming chemical engineering. Chem Eng Prog 96(1):22–34Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Keller GE, Bryan PF (2000) Process engineering: moving in new directions. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Boodhoo K, Harvey A (2013) Process intensification: an overview of principles and practice. In: Boodhoo K, Harvey A (eds) Process intensification for green chemistry: engineering solutions for sustainable chemical processing. Wiley, Chichester.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118498521.ch1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kardashev GA (1990) Physical methods of process intensification in chemical technology. Moscow, Khimia. 208p. (in Russian)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Benali M, Kudra T (2008) Drying process intensification: application to food processing. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/266211018. Accessed 11 Sept 2016
  28. 28.
    Villanova AA (2013) Granulation by agglomeration of ceramic compositions ground in dry phase. US Patent application US020130248625A1, 2011Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Livotov P (2008) Method for quantitative evaluation of innovation tasks for technical systems, products and processes. In: Proceedings of ETRIA World conference 2008 “Synthesis in Innovation”, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands, 5–7 Nov 2008, pp. 197–199, ISBN 978–90–365-2749-1Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Souchkov V (2005) Root Conflict Analysis (RCA+): structuring and visualization of contradictions. In: Proceedings of ETRIA TRIZ future 2005 conference, Graz, Austria, 16–18 Nov 2005, LeykamGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Didier Casner
    • 1
  • Pavel Livotov
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mas’udah
    • 1
  • Patricia Kely da Silva
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Mechanical and Process Engineering, Lab for Product and Process InnovationOffenburg University of Applied SciencesOffenburgGermany

Personalised recommendations