Advertisement

Adults’ Conception of Multiplication: Effects of Schooling on Multiplicative Conceptual Field

  • Andrea MaffiaEmail author
  • Maria Alessandra Mariotti
Chapter
Part of the ICME-13 Monographs book series (ICME13Mo)

Abstract

School mathematics is often related to a needing for memorization of a lot of information, times-tables are a paradigmatic example. A large amount of research on arithmetical facts has been implemented within cognitive psychology but rarely it is related to mathematics education research and quantitative methods are always used. In this paper it is presented a pilot study: ten interviews with adults are qualitatively analyzed using constructs from both research fields, showing that times-tables organization in memory could depend on school instruction. Level of instruction of subjects is indicated as an important variable in recalling and in choosing computation strategies, namely in the construction of the concept of multiplication.

Keywords

Multiplication Long-term memory Conceptual field Schooling 

References

  1. Bahrick, H. P., & Hall, L. K. (1991). Lifetime maintenance of high school mathematics content. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120(1), 20–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bahrick, H. P., & Phelps, E. (1995). The maintenance of marginal knowledge. In U. Neisser & E. Winograd (Eds.), Remembering reconsidered: Ecological and traditional approaches to the study of memory (pp. 178–192). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Butterworth, B., Marchesini, M., & Girelli, L. (2003). Basic multiplication combinations: Passive storage or dynamic reorganization? In A. J. Baroody & A. Dowker (Eds.), The development of arithmetic concepts and skills: Constructing adaptive expertise (pp. 189–202). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.Google Scholar
  4. Byers, V., & Erlwanger, S. (1985). Memory in mathematical understanding. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 16, 259–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Campbell, J. I. D. (1987). Production, verification, and priming of multiplication facts. Memory & Cognition, 15(4), 349–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dagenbach, D., & McCloskey, M. (1992). The organization of arithmetic facts in memory: Evidence from a brain-damaged patient. Brain and Cognition, 20(2), 345–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fischbein, E., Deri, M., Nello, M. S., & Marino, M. S. (1985). The role of implicit models in solving verbal problems in multiplication and division. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16, 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fremont, H. (1967). New mathematics and old dilemmas. The Mathematics Teacher, 60(7), 715–719.Google Scholar
  9. García-Orza, J., Damas-López, J., & Matas, A. (2009). “2x3” primes naming “6”: Evidence from masked priming. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71(3), 471–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Geary, D. C., Widaman, K. F., & Little, T. D. (1986). Cognitive addition and multiplication: Evidence for a single memory network. Memory & Cognition, 14(6), 478–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Karsenty, R. (2002). What do adults remember from their high school mathematics? The case of linear functions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 51(1–2), 117–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. LeFevre, J. A., Lei, Q., Smith-Chant, B. L., & Mullins, D. B. (2001). Multiplication by eye and by ear for Chinese-speaking and English-speaking adults. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55(4), 277–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lemaire, P., & Fayol, M. (1995). When plausibility judgments supersede fact retrieval: The example of the odd-even effect on product verification. Memory & Cognition, 23(1), 34–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mariotti, M. A., & Maffia, A. (2015). Cosa ricordano gli adulti sulle tabelline. Pedagogia più Didattica, 1(1), 21–30.Google Scholar
  15. McCloskey, M., Harley, W., & Sokol, S. M. (1991). Models of arithmetic fact retrieval: An evaluation in light of findings from normal and brain-damaged subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17(3), 377–397.Google Scholar
  16. Nunes, T., Schliemann, A. D., & Carraher, D. W. (1993). Street mathematics and school mathematics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. (1977). Scripts, goals, plans, and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  18. Sherin, B., & Fuson, K. (2005). Multiplication strategies and the appropriation of computational resources. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36(4), 347–395.Google Scholar
  19. Siegler, R. S. (1988). Strategy choice procedures and the development of multiplication skills. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117(3), 258–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In E. Tulving & W. Dondaldson (Eds.), Organization of memory (pp. 381–403). London, UK: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  21. Vergnaud, G. (1983). Multiplicative structures. In L. Landau (Ed.), Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes (pp. 127–174). London, UK: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  22. Vergnaud, G. (1988). Multiplicative structures. In J. Hiebert & B. Behr (Eds.), Number concepts and operations in the middle grades (pp. 141–161). Reston, VA: NCTM.Google Scholar
  23. Zan, R., & Di Martino, P. (2009). Different profiles of attitude towards mathematics: The case of learned helplessness. In M. Tzekaki, M. Kaldrimidou, & H. Sakonidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33th Conference of PME (Vol. 5, pp. 417–424). Thessaloniki, Greece: IGPME.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Education and HumanitiesUniversity of Modena and Reggio EmiliaReggio EmiliaItaly
  2. 2.Department of Mathematics and Information ScienceUniversity of SienaSienaItaly

Personalised recommendations