Advertisement

Not Making the Grade: How Increased Reliance on Adjunct Faculty Diminishes Excellence, Academic Freedom, and the Search for New Knowledge

  • Anthony H. NormoreEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Neighborhoods, Communities, and Urban Marginality book series (NCUM)

Abstract

As higher education adapts to changing circumstances, limiting the number and kind of part-time and adjunct faculty appointments and ensuring humane employment conditions will help sustain and preserve the values and integrity of higher education. Although the needs of the academic community may justify the use of many part-time and adjunct faculty, the terms and conditions of these appointments may disenfranchise and weaken the educational experiences and resources for students. Quite often the terms and conditions of such appointments are inadequate to support responsible teaching or, by extension, a career. This chapter hopes to encourage higher education decision makers to avoid marginalizing as a result of their reliance on part-time and adjunct faculty. The chapter concludes with recommendations for higher education administrators to consider.

References

  1. Alleman, N. F., & Haviland, D. (2017). I Expect to be engaged as an equal: Collegiality expectations of full-time, non-tenure-track faculty members. Higher Education, 74(3), 527–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, T. H., Harbinger, H., & Para, D. J. (2013). Navigating the new normal. To Improve the Academy, 32, 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. American Association of Adjunct Education. (2018). Professional development. Retrieved from http://adjuncteducation.weebly.com/about.html
  4. American Association of Community Colleges. (1995–96). Pocket profile of community colleges: Trends and statistics. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  5. American Association of University Professors. (2003). Contingent appointments and the academic profession. Washington, DC: American Association of University Professors.Google Scholar
  6. American Association of University Professors. (2005). Trends in faculty status, 1975–2003. Washington, DC: American Association of University Professors Retrieved from http://www.aacu.org/meetings/annualmeeting/AM5/documents/AAUPHandout.pdf.Google Scholar
  7. American Association of University Professors. (2010). Selected references on contingent faculty and student success. Washington, DC: American Association of University Professors Retrieved from http://www.aacu.org/meetings/annualmeeting/AM10/documents/AAUPHandout.pdf.Google Scholar
  8. American Federation of Teachers. (2009). The American academic: The state of higher education workforce 1997–2007. Washington, DC: American Federation of Teachers. Retrieved from http://www.aftface.org/storage/face/documents/ameracad_report_97-07for_web.pdf
  9. American Federation of Teachers Higher Education Data Center. (2012). US national higher education stats. Washington, DC: American Federation of Teachers Retrieved from http://highereddata.aft.org/instit/national/single_reports.cfm.Google Scholar
  10. American Sociological Association Task Force on Contingent Faculty. (2017). Contingent faculty employment in sociology. Retrieved from http://www.asanet.org/about-asa/committees-andtask-forces/task-force-contingent-faculty
  11. Baldwin, R. G., & Chronister, J. L. (2001). Teaching without tenure. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Baldwin, R. G., & Wawrzynski, M. R. (2011). Contingent faculty as teachers: What we know; What we need to know. American Behavioral Scientist, 55(11), 1485–1509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Banachowski, G. (1997). Advantages and disadvantages of employing part-time faculty in community colleges. Retrieved from https://www.ericdigests.org/1997-4/part.htm
  14. Benjamin, E. (2002). How over-reliance upon contingent appointments diminishes faculty involvement in student learning. Peer Review, 5(1), 4–10.Google Scholar
  15. Benjamin, E. (2003). Exploring the role of contingent instructional staff in undergraduate learning. New Directions for Higher Education (No. 123). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  16. Bettinger, E., & Long, B. T. (2004). Do college instructors matter? The effects of adjuncts and graduate assistants on students’ interests and success. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper No. 10370.Google Scholar
  17. Bettinger, E., & Long, B. T. (2010). Does cheaper mean better? The impact of using adjunct instructors on student outcomes. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 92(3), 598–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Birmingham, K. (2017). The great shame of our profession: How the humanities survive on exploitation. Retrieved from http://www.chronicle.com/article/The-Great-Shame-of-Our/239148/
  19. California State University. (2016). Headcount of part-time faculty by gender and ethnicity, Fall 2016. Retrieved from https://www2.calstate.edu/csu-system/faculty-staff/employeeprofile/csu-faculty/Pages/headcount-of-part-time-faculty-by-gender-and-ethnicity.aspx
  20. California State University. (2017, January). 2016 faculty recruitment in the California state university system. Long Beach: CSU Human Resources, Office of the Chancellor. Retrieved from https://www.calstate.edu/hr/faculty-resources/researchanalysis/documents/facrecsurvrep03.pdf
  21. Cline, L. (1993). Work to school transition: Part-time faculty bring expertise, challenges to college. Vocational Education Journal, 68(2), 26–27 49.Google Scholar
  22. Community College Survey of Student Engagement. (2009). Making connections: Dimensions of student engagement. Austin: Community College Survey of Student Engagement.Google Scholar
  23. Concordia University. (2017). How to become an adjunct professor: Job, education, salary. Retrieved from https://education.cu-portland.edu/blog/teaching-careers/adjunct-professor/
  24. Conley, V. M., & Leslie, D. W. (2002). Part-time instructional faculty and staff: Who they are, what they do, and what they think. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
  25. Cross, J. G., & Goldenberg, E. N. (2009). Off-track profs: Non-tenured teachers in higher education. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  26. Curtis, J. W., & Jacobe, M. (2006). Consequences: An increasingly contingent faculty. AAUP Contingent Faculty Index 2006. Available at http://www.aaup.org/AAUP/pubsres/research/conind2006.htm
  27. Delphi Project. (2013). Selected research on connections between non-tenure-track faculty and student success. Retrieved from https://pullias.usc.edu/wpcontent/uploads/2013/07/Delphi-NTTF_Annotated-Research-Summary_2013WebPDF.pdf
  28. Digranes, J. L. A., & Digranes, S. H. (1995). Current and proposed uses of technology for training part-time faculty. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 19(2), 161–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Eagan, M. K., & Jaeger, A. J. (2008). Effects of exposure to part-time faculty on community college transfer. Research in Higher Education, No. 0361-0365.Google Scholar
  30. Edmonds, D. (2017). More than half of college faculty are adjuncts: Should you care? Retrieved from http://collegeleaf.com/more-than-half-of-college-faculty-are-adjuncts-should-you-care/
  31. Ehrenberg, R. L., & Zhang, L. (2004). Do tenured and non-tenure track faculty matter? Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ellsworth, P. (2008). The challenges of an adjunct-dominated faculty. Retrieved from http://www2.acenet.edu/resources/chairs/docs/Ellsworth_adjunct.pdf
  33. Erbe, N., & Normore, A. H. (2015). Cross-cultural collaboration and leadership in modern organizations. Hershey: IGI Global Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Fairlie, R. W., Hoffmann, F., & Oreopoulos, P. (2011). A community college instructor like me: Race and ethnicity interactions in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Flipped Learning Network. (2012). Improve student learning and teacher satisfaction with one flip of the classroom. Retrieved from http://flippedlearning1.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/classroomwindowinfographic7-12.pdf
  36. Gappa, J. M., & Leslie, D. W. (1993). The invisible faculty: Improving the status of part timers in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  37. Gross, B., & Goldhaber, D. (2009). Community college transfer and articulation policies: Looking beneath the surface. Center on Reinventing Public Education, Working Paper No. 2009_1.Google Scholar
  38. Harrington, C., & Schibik, T. (2001). Caveat emptor: Is there a relationship between part-time faculty utilization and student learning retention? Association for Institutional Research Files On-Line, 91.Google Scholar
  39. Hollenshead, C. (2007). Making the best of both worlds: Findings from a national institution level survey on non-tenure-track faculty. Ann Arbor: Center for the Education of Women.Google Scholar
  40. Hurlburt, S., & McGarrah, M. (2016). The shifting academic workforce: Where are the contingent faculty? Retrieved from http://www.deltacostproject.org/sites/default/files/products/Shifting-Academic-Workforce-November2016_0.pdf
  41. Impara, J. C., Hoerner, J. L., Clowes, D. A., & Alkins, M. T. (1991). Professional development programs: A comparison of full-and part-time occupational-technical faculty. Community College Catalyst, 21(2), 8–12.Google Scholar
  42. Jacoby, D. (2006). The effects of part-time faculty employment on community college graduation rates. Journal of Higher Education, 77(6), 1081–1103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jaeger, A. J., & Eagan, M. K. (2009). Unintended consequences: Examining the effect of part-time faculty members on associate’s degree completion. Community College Review.Google Scholar
  44. Jaeger, A. J., & Eagan, M. K. (2010). Examining retention and contingent faculty use in a state system of public higher education. Educational Policy, 20(10), 1–31.Google Scholar
  45. Kelly, D. K. (1992). Part-time and evening faculty: Promoting teaching excellence for adult evening college students. Fullerton: Fullerton College.Google Scholar
  46. Kezar, A. (2010). Institutionalizing equitable policies and practices for contingent faculty. Journal of Higher Education, 84(1), 56–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kezar, A. (Ed.). (2012). Embracing non-tenure-track faculty: Changing campuses for the new faculty majority. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Kezar, A. (2013). Departmental cultures and non-tenure-track faculty: Willingness, capacity and opportunity to perform at four-year institutions. The Journal of Higher Education, 84(2), 153–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kezar, A. (2016). Interfolio presents: Supporting non-tenure track faculty. Retrieved from https://www.slideshare.net/Interfolio/interfolio-presentssupporting-nontenure-track-faculty-with-adrianna-kezar-phd
  50. Kezar, A., & Sam, C. (2010). Understanding the new majority of non-tenure-track faculty in higher education: Demographics, experiences, and plans of action. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  51. Kezar, A. Maxey, D., & Holcombe, E. (2015). The professoriate reconsidered: A study of new faculty models. The Delphi Project for the Changing Faculty and Student Success. Retrieved from https://www.aacu.org/sites/default/files/ProfessoriateReconsidered.pdf
  52. Lankard, B. A. (1993). Part-time faculty in adult and vocational education. Columbus: ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education.Google Scholar
  53. Lombardi, J. (1992). The ambiguity of the part-time faculty. In J. Lombardi & A. M. Cohen (Eds.), Perspectives on the community college: Essays (pp. 51–67). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.Google Scholar
  54. Maxey, D., & Kezar, A. (2013). The Delphi Project database of non-tenure-track faculty example practices: Collaborative Efforts for Human Resources and Academic Affairs to Improve Non-Tenure-Track Faculty Support at Villanova University. Los Angeles: Pullias Center for Higher Education.Google Scholar
  55. McGuire, J. (1993). Part-time faculty: Partners in excellence. Leadership Abstracts, 6(6), 1–3.Google Scholar
  56. Monroe, C., & Denman, S. (1991). Assimilating adjunct faculty: Problems and opportunities. ACA Bulletin, 77, 56–62.Google Scholar
  57. National Center for Educational Statistics. (2017). The condition of education: Characteristics of postsecondary faculty. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_csc.asp
  58. National Council of Teachers of English. (2015). Statement from the conference on the growing use of part-time and adjunct faculty. Retrieved from http://www2.ncte.org/statement/useofparttimefaculty/
  59. National Education Association. (2007). Part-time faculty: A look at data and issues. Washington, DC: National Education Association. Retrieved from http://www.nea.org/assets/docs/HE/vol11no3.pdf
  60. National Education Association. (2018). Contingent faculty. Retrieved from http://www.nea.org/home/34762.htm
  61. Ott, M. C., & Dippold, L. K. (2017). Adjunct employment preference: Who wants to be full-time faculty? Retrieved from https://asu.pure.elsevier.com/en/publications/adjunct-employment-preference-who-wants-to-befull-time-faculty
  62. Ponjuan, L., Conley, V. M., & Trower, C. (2011). Career stage differences in tenure track faculty perceptions of professional and personal relationships with colleagues. Journal of Higher Education, 82(3), 319–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pullias Center of Higher Education. (n.d.). The changing faculty and student success selected research on connections between non-tenure-track faculty and student learning. Retrieved from https://pullias.usc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Delphi-NTTF_Annotated-Research-Summary_WebPDF.pdf
  64. Reed, S. (1985, August 18). The troubled faculty. New York Times Education Summer Survey, 41–42.Google Scholar
  65. Roth, K. R., & Ritter, Z. S. (2015). Diversity and the need for cross-cultural leadership and collaboration. In N. Erbe & A. H. Normore (Eds.), Cross-cultural collaboration and leadership in modern organizations (pp. 196–215). Hershey: IGI Global.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Russell, A. (2006). Faculty trends and issues. Policy Matters, 3(4), 5–6.Google Scholar
  67. Samuel, F. M. (1989). Strategy to eliminate inequality of higher education. Community College Review, 17(2), 41–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Schuster, J. H., & Finkelstein, M. J. (2006). American faculty: The restructuring of academic work and careers. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Silvers, P. J. (1990). Utilization of associate faculty at Pima Community College: A report on surveys of college associates, faculty and department heads. Tucson: Pima Community College Office of Research and Planning.Google Scholar
  70. Smith, D. G. (2009). Diversity’s promise for higher education: Making it work. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Spangler, M. S. (1990). Part-time faculty: Recognizing an unprotected minority (Position\Paper 120). Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
  72. Steiger, K. (2013). The Pink Collar Workforce of Academia: Low pay Adjunct Faculty who are mostly female, have started unionizing for better pay and winning. Retrieved from https://www.thenation.com/article/academias-pink-collar-workforce/
  73. Stenerson, J., Blanchard, L., Fassiotto, M., Hernandez, M., & Muth, A. (2010). The role of adjuncts in the professoriate. Retrieved from, the web site of the American Association of Colleges & Universities at https://www.aacu.org/publications-research/periodicals/roleadjuncts-professoriate
  74. Strang, T. (2015). Top challenges faced by adjunct instructors. Retrieved from https://blog.cengage.com/category/professional-development-and-training/
  75. Study of New Scholars. (2002). The study of new scholars receives $1 million to examine junior faculty workplace satisfaction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Graduate School of Education.Google Scholar
  76. Townsend, R. (2007). Summary of data from surveys by the coalition on the academic workforce. Coalition on the Academic Workforce.Google Scholar
  77. Turkel, G. (2017). Collective bargaining, shared governance, and academic freedom: Creating policies for full-time non-tenure-track faculty at the University of Delaware. Retrieved from https://www.aaup.org/sites/default/files/Turkel_2.pdf
  78. Twigg, H. P. (1989). Uses and abuses of adjunct faculty in higher education. Paper presented at a National Conference of the Community College Humanities Association, Washington, DC, November, 1989.Google Scholar
  79. Umbach, P. (2007). How effective are they? Exploring the impact of contingent faculty on undergraduate education. The Review of Higher Education, 30(2), 91–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Umbach, P. (2008). The effects of part-time faculty appointments on instructional techniques and commitment to teaching. Paper presented at the 33rd Annual Conference of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Jacksonville.Google Scholar
  81. Wootton, L. (2014). The Delphi Project database of non-tenure-track faculty example practices: The increasingly strong involvement of term faculty in faculty governance and administration at American University. Los Angeles: Pullias Center for Higher Education. Retrieved from http://www.thechangingfaculty.org/uploads/9/1/4/8/91481016/delphi_examplepractices_americanuniversity.pdf

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.California State University, Dominguez HillsCarsonUSA

Personalised recommendations