Advertisement

Introduction

  • Kristin Ranestad
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Economic History book series (PEHS)

Abstract

The purpose of this introductory chapter is twofold. First, the author presents a survey of the debate about growth in ‘natural resource–intensive economies’ and places herself in the literature. Rejecting the idea that natural resource industries are doomed to slow growth, the chapter shows that industries based on natural resource may have been highly innovative, knowledge-based, dynamic, and high-performing, historically as well as today. Second, the author discusses the literature about institutions, organisations and economic growth and sets the basis for the historical empirical approach of knowledge organisations aimed to develop knowledge for mining in Norway. Finally, the used concepts, the definitions, the sources, and the main questions are outlined.

Bibliography

Secondary Sources (Literature)

  1. Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why Nations Fail. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
  2. Ahlström, G. (1982). Engineers and Industrial Growth. London/Canberra: CROOM HELM.Google Scholar
  3. Ahlström, G. (1992). Technical Competence and Industrial Growth. Lund Papers in Economic History, No. 14.Google Scholar
  4. Ahlström, G. (1995). Technological Development and Industrial Exhibitions 1850–1914. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Andersen, A. D. (2012). Towards a New Approach to Natural Resources and Development: The Role of Learning, Innovation and Linkage Dynamics. International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, 5(3), 291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Andrade, S., & Morales, J. (2007). The Role of the Natural Resource Curse in Preventing Development in Politically Unstable Countries: Case Studies of Angola and Bolivia. Institute for Advanced Development Studies, Development Research Working Paper Series No. 11.Google Scholar
  7. Arezki, R., & Bruckner, M. (2011). Resource Windfalls and Emerging Market Sovereign Bond Spreads: The Role of Political Institutions. Research Paper No. 2011-08. Australia: University of Adelaide, School of Economics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Arrow, K. J. (1962). The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing. The Review of Economic Studies, 29(3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bakwena, M. (2010). Do Better Institutions Alleviate the Resource Curse? Evidence from a Dynamic Panel Approach, PhD Thesis. Queensland: The University of Queensland Publication.Google Scholar
  10. Bakwena, M., et al. (2009). Avoiding the Resource Curse: The Role of Institutions. MRG Discussion Paper Series from School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia No. 32. Australia: University of Queensland.Google Scholar
  11. Basberg, B. L. (2006). Patenting and Early Industrialization in Norway, 1860–1914. Was There a Linkage? Scandinavian Economic History Review, 54(1), 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Becker, G. S. (1975). Human Capital. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Berg, M., & Bruland, K. (Eds.). (1998). Technological Revolutions in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  14. Bergh, T., et al. (1983). Norge fra u-land til i-land: vekst og utviklingslinjer 1830–1980. Oslo: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
  15. Bhattacharyya, S., & Hodler, R. (2009). Natural Resources, Democracy and Corruption. OxCarre Research Paper, No. 2009-20.Google Scholar
  16. Blomström, M., & Meller, P. (Eds.). (1991). Diverging Paths Comparing a Century of Scandinavian and Latin American Economic Development. Washington, DC: Johns Hopkins.Google Scholar
  17. Breitwieser, A., & Foster, N. (2012). Intellectual Property Rights, Innovation and Technology Transfer: A Survey. The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies Working Papers, 88.Google Scholar
  18. Brooks, S. M., & Kurtz, M. (2011). Conditioning the “Resource Curse”: Globalization, Human Capital, and Growth in Oil-Rich Nations. Comparative Political Studies, 44(6), 747–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bruland, K. (1989). British Technology and European Industrialization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cabrales, A., & Hauk, E. (2009). The Quality of Political Institutions and the Curse of Natural Resources. The Economic Journal, 121, 58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Caicedo, F. V., & Maloney, W. F. (2014). Engineers, Innovative Capacity and Development in the Americas. Policy Research Working Paper; No. WPS 6814. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.Google Scholar
  22. Carstens, H. (2000). …Bygger i Berge: en beretning om norsk bergverksdrift. Trondheim: Norsk bergindustriforening Den norske bergingeniørforening Tapir.Google Scholar
  23. CEDA. (2007, July). Competing from Australia, No. 58. Melbourne: Committee for Economic Development of Australia.Google Scholar
  24. Cipolla, C. M. (1969). Literacy and Development in the West. Baltimore: Penguin Books Ltd.Google Scholar
  25. Collier P., & Hoeffler, A. (2004). Greed and Grievance in Civil Wars. Oxford Economic Papers, 56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Craft, N. (2011). Explaining the First Industrial Revolution: Two Views. European Review of Economic History, 15, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Culver, W. W., & Reinhart, C. J. (1989). Capital Dreams: Chile’s Response to Nineteenth-Century World Copper Competition. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 31(4), 722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. David, P., & Wright, G. (1997). Increasing Returns and the Genesis of American Resource Abundance. Industrial and Corporate Change, 6(2), 203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. De Ferranti, D., et al. (2002). From Natural Resources to the Knowledge Economy. Washington, DC: The World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Easterlin, R. A. (1981). Why Isn’t the Whole World Developed? Journal of Economic History, 41(1), 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Edquist, C. (2001, June 12–15). The Systems of Innovation Approach and Innovation Policy: An Account of the State of the Art. Lead Paper Presented at the DRUID Conference, Aalborg.Google Scholar
  32. Eicher, T., & Turnovsky, S. (Eds.). (2003). Inequality and Growth: Theory and Policy Implications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  33. Fagerberg, J., et al. (2008, June). Innovation-Systems, Path-Dependency and Policy: The Co-evolution of Science, Technology and Innovation Policy and Industrial Structure in a Small, Resource-Based Economy. Working Papers on Innovation Studies 20080624, Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
  34. Falvey, R., & Foster, N. (2006). The Role of Intellectual Property Rights in Technology Transfer and Economic Growth: Theory and Evidence. Vienna: United Nations Industrial Development Organization.Google Scholar
  35. Fosu, A. K. (2013). Development Success: Historical Accounts from More Advanced Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Fox, R., & Guagnini, A. (1993). Education, Technology, and Industrial Performance in Europe, 1850–1939. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
  37. Frankel, J. A. (2010). The Natural Resource Curse: A Survey. NBER Working Paper 15836.Google Scholar
  38. Gerschenkron, A. (1962). Economic Backwardness. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Glaeser, E. (2010, June 22). Thinkers and Tinkerers. History, New Republic.Google Scholar
  40. Greif, A. (2006). Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy: Lessons from Medieval Trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Grönberg, P.-O. (2003). Learning and Returning. Return Migration of Swedish Engineers from the United States, 1880–1940. PhD Thesis. Sweden: Umeå University.Google Scholar
  42. Gylfason, T. (2001). Natural Resources, Education and Economic Development. European Economic Review, 45, 847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Havro, G. B., & Santiso, J. (2010, June). Rescuing the Resource Rich: How Can International Development Policy Help Tame the Resource Curse? ESADE Knowledge, Working Paper Series.Google Scholar
  44. Hirsch-Kreinsen, H., et al. (2003). Low-Tech Industries and the Knowledge Economy: State of the Art and Research Challenges. In PILOT Policy and Innovation in Low-Tech. Oslo: STEP – Centre for Innovation Research.Google Scholar
  45. Hodne, F., & Grytten, O. H. (2000). Norsk økonomi i det nittende århundre. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.Google Scholar
  46. Karl, T. L. (1997). The Paradox of Plenty. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  47. Kuznets, S. (1965). Economic Growth and Structure. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  48. Landau, R., & Rosenberg, N. (Eds.). (1986). The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  49. Lange, E. (Ed.). (1989). Teknologi i virksomhet: verkstedindustri i Norge etter 1840. Oslo: Ad notam forlag.Google Scholar
  50. Larsen, E. R. (2003). Are Rich Countries Immune to the Resource Curse? Evidence from Norway’s Management of its Oil Riches. Discussion Paper 362 Statistics Norway.Google Scholar
  51. Lederman, D., & Maloney, W. (2007). Natural Resources: Neither Curse nor Destiny. Washington, DC/Palo Alto: World Bank/Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Locke, R. R. (1984). The End of the Practical Man. London: JAI Press Inc.Google Scholar
  53. Lundgreen, P. (1990). Engineering Education in Europe and the U.S.A, 1750–1930: The Rise to Dominance of School Culture and the Engineering Professions. Annals of Science, 47(1), 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lundvall, B.-Å. (1992). National Systems of Innovation. London: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar
  55. Maloney, W. F. (2002). Missed Opportunities: Innovation and Resource-Based Growth in Latin America. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2935.Google Scholar
  56. Martin, W., & Mitra, D. (2001). Productivity Growth and Convergence in Agriculture and Manufacturing. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 49(2), 403–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mehlum, H., Moene, K., & Torvik, R. (2005). Institutions and the Resource Curse. The Economic Journal, 116(508), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mendoza, R. U., et al. (2012, April 25). Devil’s Excrement or Manna from Heaven? A Survey of Strategies in Natural Resource Wealth Management. Asian Institute of Management Working Paper.Google Scholar
  59. Milward, A., & Saul, S. B. (1973). The Economic Development of Continental Europe, 1780–1870. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  60. Milward, A., & Saul, S. B. (1977). The Development of the Economies of Continental Europe 1850–1914. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  61. Mokyr, J. (2005). Gifts of Athena. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Mokyr, J. (2006). Knowledge, Enlightenment, and the Industrial Revolution: Reflections on Gifts of Athena. History of Science, 45(part 2), 185.Google Scholar
  63. Mokyr, J. (2009a). Intellectual Property Rights, the Industrial Revolution, and the Beginnings of Modern Economic Growth. American Economic Review, 99(2), 349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Mokyr, J. (2009b). The Enlightened Economy. An Economic History of Britain 1700–1850. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Musgrave, P. (1967). Technical Change the Labour Force and Education. Oxford/New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  66. Nelson, R. R. (1968). Innovation. In International Encyclopedia of Social Sciences, 7.Google Scholar
  67. Nelson, R. R. (1993). National Innovation Systems a Comparative Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Nelson, B., & Behar, A. (2008, February 7). Natural Resources, Growth and Spatially-Based Development: A View of the Literature. World Development Report, Reshaping Economic Geography.Google Scholar
  69. Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  70. North, D. (1955). Location Theory and Regional Economic Growth. Journal of Political Economy, 63, 243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. North, D. C. (1991). Institutions. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. North, D. C. (1993). New Institutional Economics and Development. Washington, DC: Washington University.Google Scholar
  73. North, D. C. (1996). Economic Performance Through Time: The Limits to Knowledge. EconWPA, Economic History, 9612004.Google Scholar
  74. North, D. (2006). A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History. George Mason University, Working Paper 75.Google Scholar
  75. North, D. (2009a). Violence and Social Orders. The Annual Proceedings of the Wealth and Well-Being of Nations, Beloit.Google Scholar
  76. North, D. (2009b). Violence and Social Orders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Nuur, C., & Laestadius, S. (2009). Anomalies in the Resource Curse Paradigm: The Case of Sweden. Trieta Research Report, The Royal Institute of Technology, KTH.Google Scholar
  78. O’Brien, P. (2011). Stages in the Evolution of a Western Regime for the Discovery, Development and Diffusion of Useful and Reliable Knowledge. URKEW Discussion Paper No. 7, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
  79. O’Neal, L., & Williamson, J. G. (Eds.). (2014). Cambridge History of Capitalism (Vol. II). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  80. O’Rourke, K. H., & Williamson, J. G. (1995). Education, Globalization and Catch-Up: Scandinavia in the Swedish Mirror. Scandinavian Economic History Review, 43(3), 287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Odagiri, H., et al. (2010). Intellectual Property Rights, Development and Catch-Up an International Comparative Study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Oxford Encyclopedia of Economic History, Vol. II (2003): Cooperative Agriculture and Farmer Cooperatives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  83. Petrovsky, N. (2004). Does Natural Resource Wealth Spoil and Corrupt Governments? A New Test of the Resource Curse Thesis. University of North Texas.Google Scholar
  84. Polanyi, M. (1983). The Tacit Dimension. Gloucester: Peter Smith.Google Scholar
  85. Prebisch, R. (1950). The Economic Development of Latin America and Its Principal Problems. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  86. Roderick, G. W., & Stephens, M. D. (1972). Scientific and Technical Education in Nineteenth-Century England. Newton Abbot: David & Charles.Google Scholar
  87. Sachs, J. D., & Warner, A. M. (2001). The Curse of Natural Resources. European Economic Review, 45, 4–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Sæther, B., Isaksen, A., & Karlsen, A. (2011, June). Innovation by Co-evolution in Natural Resource Industries: The Norwegian Experience. Geoforum, 42(3), 373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Sandberg, P. (1979). The Case of the Impoverished Sophisticate: Human Capital and Swedish Economic Growth Before World War 1. Journal of Economic History, 49, 1.Google Scholar
  90. Sandberg, L. (1982). Ignorance, Poverty and Economic Backwardness in the Early Stages of European Industrialization: Variations on Alexander Gerschenkron’s Grand Theme. Journal of European Economic History, 11, 675–697.Google Scholar
  91. Sanderson, M. (1994). The Missing Stratum Technical School Education in England 1900–1990s. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
  92. Sejersted, F. (1993). Demokratisk kapitalisme. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
  93. Smart, M. (2009). Natural Resource Diversity and Democracy. The Economic Society of Australia, 28, 366.Google Scholar
  94. Spence, M. (1973). Job Market Signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Statistisk sentralbyrå (1866–1940): Norges offisielle statistikk, Norges Bergverksdrift. Oslo: Statistisk sentralbyrå.Google Scholar
  96. Statistisk Sentralbyrå. (1952). Norges Offisielle Statistikk, Nasjonalregnskap 1930–1939 og 1946–1951. Oslo: Statistisk Sentralbyrå.Google Scholar
  97. Statistisk Sentralbyrå. (1953). Norges Officielle Statistikk, Nasjonalregnskap 1900–1929. Oslo: Statistisk Sentralbyrå.Google Scholar
  98. Suslova, E., & Volchkova, N. (2007). Human Capital, Industrial Growth and Resource Curse. State University Higher School of Economics: WP 13/2007/11 CAS Working Paper Series.Google Scholar
  99. The Dutch Disease. (1977, November 26). The Economist.Google Scholar
  100. UNCTAD. (2001). World Investment Report 2001 Promoting Linkages. New York/Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar
  101. Van der Ploeg, F. (2010). Natural Resources: Curse or Blessing? CESifo Working Paper No. 3125.Google Scholar
  102. Vernengo, M. (2006). Technology, Finance, and Dependency: Latin American Radical Political Economy in Retrospect. Review of Radical Political Economics, 38(4), 551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Ville, S., & Wicken, O. (2013, October 1). The Dynamics of Resource-Based Economic Development: Evidence from Australia and Norway. Industrial and Corporate Change, 22(5), 1341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Viner, J. (1952, February). International Trade and Economic Development. Louvain Economic Review, 20(1).Google Scholar
  105. Wicken, O. (2010). The Norwegian Path Creating and Building Enabling Sectors. Working Paper, Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
  106. Wrigley, E. A. (2010). Energy and the Industrial Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Web Pages

  1. UNDP. (2018, March 30). Income Gini Coefficient. Retrieved from http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/income-gini-coefficient
  2. United Nations Development Programme. (2018, March 30). Human Development Reports. http://hdr.undp.org/en/data
  3. World Data Bank. (2018, March 30). World Development Indicators (WDI) & Global Development Finance (GDF). Retrieved from http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kristin Ranestad
    • 1
  1. 1.University of OsloOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations