Incongruous Transnational Lives: New York
This chapter analyzes the transnational lives of 22 Chinese Singaporeans who lived and were researched in New York City in 2009. These lives spanned the United States, Singapore, and possibly other western and/or asian societies. The chapter shows that unlike the participants in London, the New York participants assessed that their past transnational education contexts foremost were not hybrid, but more strongly were characterized by incongruities, stemming from experiencing high cultural differences or distance. Next, are explanations of the reasons why the New York participants’ transnational work socialities were highly diverse, and why the New York participants saw both advantages and disadvantages with working in New York (or more broadly in the West), and/or in Singapore (and possibly other places in Asia). Then, this chapter discusses the finding that the New York participants’ transnational family socialities also often were incongruous, and to a lower extent homogenous. Next, this chapter comments on the high degrees of ruptures and disjuncture in the New York participants’ transnational friendships/lifestyle socialities, and shows that these incongruities impinged upon, or intersected with incongruities in the transnational family socialities of the Chinese Singaporeans in New York.
- AsiaOne. 2012. “5000 Gather in New York for Singapore Day.” AsiaOne, April 15. Accessed November 25, 2017. http://www.asiaone.com/print/News/Latest%2BNews/Singapore/Story/A1Story20120415-339889.html.
- Borjas, George J. 2015. “Economics of Migration.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed., edited by James D. Wright, 436–39. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Accessed December 21, 2018. http://www.sciencedirect.com.liverpool.idm.oclc.org/science/article/pii/B9780080970868710294.
- Chase, Susan E. 2005. “Learning to Listen: Narrative Principles in a Qualitative Research.” In Up Close and Personal: The Teaching and Leaning of Narrative Research, edited by Ruthellen Josselson, Amia Lieblich, and Dan P. McAdams, 79–99. Washington: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Chua, Beng Huat. 1995. “Culture, Multiculturalism, and National Identity in Singapore” (Department of Sociology Working Papers, National University of Singapore, Singapore).Google Scholar
- Falzon, Mark-Anthony. 2009. “Multi-sited Ethnography: Theory, Praxis, and Locality in Contemporary Research.” In Multi-sited Ethnography: Theory, Praxis, and Locality in Contemporary Research, edited by Mark-Anthony Falzon, 1–23. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Fong, Vanessa L. 2011. Paradise Redefined: Transnational Chinese Students and the Quest for Flexible Citizenship in the Developed World. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Held, David, ed. 2004. A Globalizing World: Culture, Economics, Politics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Hing, Ai Yun. 2013. “Children and Their Fathers in Singapore: A Generational Perspective.” In The International Handbook of the Chinese Family, edited by Kwok Bun Chan, 323–41. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Killick, David. 2012. “Seeing-Ourselves-in the-World: Developing Global Citizenship Through International Mobility and Campus Diversity.” Journal of Studies of International Education 16 (4): 372–89.Google Scholar
- Kim, Jongyoung. 2012. “The Birth of the Academic Subalterns: How Foreign Student Embody the Global Hegemony of American Universities?” Journal of Studies of International Education 16 (5): 455–76.Google Scholar
- Krieg, Renate. 2006. “Gender in Cross-Cultural Management: Women’s Careers in Sino-German Joint Ventures.” In Conflict and Innovation: Joint Ventures in China, edited by Leo Dow and Kwok Bun Chan, 84–107. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
- La Ferla, Ruth. 2003. “Generation E.A.: Ethnically Ambiguous.” The New York Times, December 28. Accessed November 24, 2012. http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/28/style/generation-ea-ethnically-ambiguous.html?pagewanted=all&src=pm.
- Nederveen Pieterse, Jan. 1997. “Globalization as Hybridization.” In Global Modernities, edited by Mike Featherstone, Scott Lash, and Roldan Robertson, 45–68. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Nederveen Pieterse, Jan. 2004. Globalization and Culture: Global Melange. Lanham: Rowan and Littlefield.Google Scholar
- Nowicka, Magdalen. 2006. Transnational Professionals and Their Cosmopolitan Universe. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
- Patton, Michael Quin. 2002. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Portes, Alejandro, and Ruben G. Rumbaut. 2014. Immigrant America. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Prystay, Chris. 2004. “At Long Last, Gum Is Legal in Singapore, But There Are Strings.” The Wall Street Journal, June 4. Accessed September 10, 2016. http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB108629672446328324.
- Sklair, Leslie. 2001. The Transnational Capitalist Class. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Sussman, Nan M. 2013. “Reforming Family Among Remigrants: Hongkongers Come Home.” In International Handbook of the Chinese Family, edited by Kwok-bun Chan, 53–75. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- United States Census Bureau. 2016. New York City, New York. United States Census Bureau. Accessed August 3, 2017. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/Newyorkcity/Newyork/PST045216.
- Zhou, Min. 2009. Contemporary Chinese America: Immigration, Ethnicity, and Community Transformation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar