Advertisement

Making Use of a Biased Eye: Photographic Studies of Neighborhoods

  • Danielle Wallace
Chapter

Abstract

As researchers, our lives, attitudes, and experiences shape the questions we ask, how we ask them, and potentially even our methods of answering those questions. How we approach scholarly work is not just about our studies but how we perceive where we are at the time and where we are ideologically. Our positions can have both positive and negative effects on our research. In this chapter, I discuss my own personal experiences as a young scholar of neighborhood disorder and how I ultimately changed a biased position toward neighborhoods and race into a more open, less-biased research agenda and methods.

Keywords

Neighborhood disorder Race Ethnography Visual methods Implicit bias Chicago 

References

  1. Chamberlain, A. W., Wallace, D., Pfeiffer, D., & Gaub, J. (2018). Housing disinvestment and crime in a phoenix suburb: Exploring the differential effects of investors and owner-occupants. Urban Affairs Review, 54(1), 190–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(1), 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Devine, P. G., & Elliot, A. J. (1995). Are racial stereotypes really fading? The Princeton trilogy revisited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(11), 1139–1150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Donohue, J. J., & Levitt, S. D. (2001). The impact of legalized abortion on crime. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, CXVI(2), 379–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Harcourt, B. E. (2001). Illusion of order: The false promise of broken windows policing. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Hoeben, E. M., Steenbeek, W., & Pauwels, L. J. R. (2016). Measuring disorder: Observer bias in systematic social observations at streets and neighborhoods. Journal of Quantitative Criminology.Google Scholar
  7. Pfeiffer, D., Wallace, D., & Chamberlain, A. (2015). Is investor purchasing of foreclosures related to neighborhood crime? Evidence from a phoenix suburb. Housing Policy Debate, 25(1), 67–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Sampson, R. J. (2012). Great American city: Chicago and the enduring neighborhood effect. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Sampson, R. J., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1999). Systematic social observation of public spaces: A new look at disorder in urban neighborhoods. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 603–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Sampson, R. J., & Raudenbush, S. W. (2004). Seeing disorder: Neighborhood stigma and the social construction of “broken windows”. Social Psychology Quarterly, 67(4), 319–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Wallace, D. (2015). A test of the routine activities and neighborhood attachment explanations for bias in disorder perceptions. Crime & Delinquency, 61(4), 587–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Wallace, D., & Louton, B. (2018). The disorder perceptions of non-residents: a textual analysis of open-ended survey responses to photographic stimuli. City and Community.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Welch, K. (2007). Black criminal stereotypes and racial profiling. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 23, 276–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Criminology and Criminal JusticeArizona State UniversityPhoenixUSA

Personalised recommendations