Advertisement

Searching for Glimmers of Ethnography in Jailhouse Criminology

  • Jacqueline B. Helfgott
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter reflects on the ways in which traditional mixed-method research designs can capture the spirit of criminological Verstehen and the ethnographic method. Experiences are offered to illustrate successes and failures in attempts to incorporate the ethnographic lens in prison and reentry-based research. Challenges are raised in incorporating elements of ethnography in traditional mixed-method designs including maintaining boundaries while listening to and treating people with respect as human beings, struggles with prison security issues and logistics, research ethics, developing trust as an outsider, and the difficulties in measuring phenomenological experience through the traditional research process. The importance of incorporating methodological creativity to employ ethnography-infused mixed-method research designs to ensure that the human element of crime and justice research is not lost in the distance that is created by jailhouse criminology is discussed.

Keywords

Jailhouse criminology Criminological Verstehen Mixed-method research designs Ethnographic lens Corrections Reentry 

References

  1. Abbott, J. H. (1991). In the belly of the beast: Letters from prison. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  2. Adler, P., & Adler, P. (2015). Constructions of deviance: Social power, context, and interaction. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. Allen, B., & Bosta, D. (1981). Games criminals play: How you can profit by knowing them. Susanville, CA: Rae John Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  4. Bogucki, K. (August 30, 2017). Personal communication.Google Scholar
  5. Davis, K. M., Peterson-Badali, M., & Skilling, T. (2015). A process evaluation of Toronto’s first youth mental health court. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 57(2), 159–187. https://doi.org/10.3138/CJCCJ.2014.E10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Densley, J. A., Adler, J. R., Zhu, L., & Lambine, M. (2017). Growing against gangs and violence: Findings from a process and outcome evaluation. Psychology of Violence, 7(2), 242–252. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Edmondson, L., & Hoover, J. (2008). Process evaluation of a bullying prevention program: A public school-county health partnership. Reclaiming Children and Youth, 16(4), 25–33.Google Scholar
  8. Ferrell, J. (1998). Criminological Verstehen: Inside the immediacy of crime. In J. Ferrell & M. S. Hamm (Eds.), Ethnography at the edge: Crime, deviance, and field research (pp. 20–42). Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Ferrell, J., & Hamm, M. S. (Eds.). (1998). Ethnography at the edge: Crime, deviance, and field research. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Fryer, A. (2016, June27). SCA grantee discovers new way of policing by asking women involved with the justice system ‘what if?’ Retrieved from https://csgjusticecenter.org/nrrc/posts/sca-granteediscovers-new-way-of-policing-by-asking-wom0000000en-involved-with-the-justice-systemwhat-if/
  11. Gacono, C. B., & Meloy, J. R. (1988). The relationship between conscious cognitive style and unconscious defensive process in the psychopath. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 15, 472–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gacono, C. B., & Meloy, J. R. (1994). The Rorschach assessment of aggressive and psychopathic personalities. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.Google Scholar
  13. Gilmore. (2011, July). The Rev. Jon Nelson, ‘a man of action, not a man of words,’ dies. The Seattle Times. Retrieved from https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/the-rev-jon-nelson-a-man-of-action-not-a-man-of-words-dies/
  14. Guerzon, T. D. (2014). 2014 superheroes for Washington families. ParentMap. Retrieved from https://www.parentmap.com/article/2014-superheroes-for-washington-families?page=9
  15. Gunnison, E., & Helfgott, J. B. (2007). Community corrections officer perceptions of ex-offender reentry needs and challenges. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 22(1), 10–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gunnison, E., & Helfgott, J. B. (2011). Factors that hinder reentry success: A view from community corrections officers. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 55(2), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gunnison, E., & Helfgott, J. B. (2013). Offender reentry: Beyond crime and punishment. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
  18. Gunnison, E., & Helfgott, J. B. (2017). Critical keys to successful offender reentry: Getting a handle on substance abuse and mental health issues. The Qualitative Report, 22(8), 2152–2172.Google Scholar
  19. Gunnison, E. & Helfgott, J.B. (2018). Women leading justice: Experiences and Insights. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Gunnison, E., Helfgott, J. B., & Wilhelm, C. (2015). Correctional practitioners on offender reentry: A missed perspective. Journal of Prison Education and Reentry, 2(1), 51–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hare, R. D. (1991, 2003). Manual for the psychopathy checklist-revised. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
  22. Helfgott, J. B. (1991). A comparison of cognitive, behavioral, and psychodynamic assessments of psychopathy: Integrative measures of understanding the psychopathic personality in criminal and noncriminal groups. Unpublished master’s thesis.Google Scholar
  23. Helfgott, J. B. (1992). The unconscious defensive process/conscious cognitive style relationship in psychopaths: An empirical study of psychopathic dynamics in criminal and noncriminal groups. Doctoral Dissertation, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.Google Scholar
  24. Helfgott, J. B. (1997a). Ex-offender needs versus community opportunity in Seattle, Washington. Federal Probation, 61, 12–24.Google Scholar
  25. Helfgott, J. B. (1997b). The unconscious defensive process/conscious cognitive style relationship in psychopaths. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 24, 278–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Helfgott, J. B. (2003). The prison tour as a pedagogical tool in undergraduate criminal justice courses. Corrections Compendium, 28(8), 1–2.Google Scholar
  27. Helfgott, J. B. (2004). Primitive defenses in the language of the psychopath: Considerations for forensic practice. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 4(3), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Helfgott, J. B. (2008). Criminal behavior: Theories, typologies, and criminal justice (pp. 203–205). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  29. Helfgott, J. B. (2014). Fame, media, and mass shootings: Culture plays a role in creating these tragedies. Crosscut. Retrieved from http://crosscut.com/2014/06/08/crime-safety/120459/fame-media-and-mass-shootings-culture-playing-role/?page=2
  30. Helfgott, J. B. (2015). Criminal behavior and the copycat effect: Review of the literature and theoretical framework for empirical investigation. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 22, 46–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Helfgott, J. B. (2016). Prison-based cognitive behavioral treatment programs: A mechanism of panoptic control. Commentary on Jennifer A. Schlosser’s (2015) narratives and discursive discipline in prison: Rewriting personal histories through cognitive-behavioral programs. Journal of Theoretical & Philosophical Criminology, 8(2), 148–159.Google Scholar
  32. Helfgott, J. B. (2018). No Remorse: Psychopathy and Criminal Justice. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger/ABC-CLIO.Google Scholar
  33. Helfgott, J. B., Atherley, L., Pollock, J., Vinson, J., Strah, B., Neidhart, E., et al. (2015, June). Evaluation of the Washington State Criminal Justice Training Commission’s “Warriors to Guardians” cultural shift and Crisis Intervention (CIT) Training final report. Washington State Criminal Justice Training Commission Consultant Agreement.Google Scholar
  34. Helfgott, J. B., Conn-Johnson, C., & Wood, N. (2015, May). Seattle Police Department CIT Culture Survey Final Report. Seattle Police Foundation/City of Seattle Police Department Consultant Agreement.Google Scholar
  35. Helfgott, J. B., & Gunnison, E. (2008). The influence of social distance on community corrections officer perceptions of offender reentry needs. Federal Probation, 72(1), 2–12.Google Scholar
  36. Helfgott, J. B., Gunnison, E., Collins, P., & Rice, S. K. (2017). The power of personal narratives in crime prevention and reentry: Process evaluation of the Seattle Police Department’s IF Project. Corrections Policy, Practice and Research, 3(2), 1–24.Google Scholar
  37. Helfgott, J.B., Gunnison, E., Murtagh, A.; Navejar, B. (2018). BADASSES: The Rise of Women in Criminal Justice. Women & Criminal Justice, 28(4).Google Scholar
  38. Helfgott, J. B., Lovell, M. L., & Lawrence, C. F. (2002). Citizens, victims, and offenders restoring justice: Accountability, healing, and hope through storytelling and dialogue. Crime Victims Report, 6, 3–4.Google Scholar
  39. Helfgott, J. B., Lovell, M. L., Lawrence, C. F., & Parsonage, W. H. (2000a). Development of the citizens, victims, and offenders restoring justice program at the Washington state reformatory. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 10, 363–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Helfgott, J. B., Lovell, M. L., Lawrence, C. F., & Parsonage, W. H. (2000b). Results from the pilot study of the citizens, victims, and offenders restoring justice program at the Washington state reformatory. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 16, 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Helfgott, J. B., & Parkin, W. (2017, January). Seattle police department’s micro-community policing plans evaluation (p. 158). Retrieved from https://www.seattle.gov/Documents/Departments/Police/Reports/SPD-MCPP-Implementation-Evauation-Final-Report.pdf
  42. Helfgott, J. B., Strah, B. M., Pollock, J., Atherley, L. T., & Vinson, J. (2018). A qualitative approach to understanding guardian models of policing. Journal of Qualitative Criminal Justice and Criminology, 6(1), 93–120.Google Scholar
  43. Horan. K. (Producer/Director) (2016). The IF Project [Motion Picture]. USA: Tinfish Films.Google Scholar
  44. Jannetta, J., & Lachman, P. (2011). Promoting partnerships between police and community services agencies: How coordination can reduce crime and improve public safety. Washington, D.C.: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.Google Scholar
  45. Johnson, R. (2001). Hardtime: Understanding and reforming the prison. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  46. Kaplan, J., Jaffe, S. R., & Lansing, S. (1988). The Accused [film]. Hollywood, CA: Paramount Pictures.Google Scholar
  47. Kinney, W., & Helfgott, J. B. (2000). Political activism over 60: Social stigma and the late-life liberal. Sociological Imagination, 37, 5–28.Google Scholar
  48. Kinney, W. J., & Helfgott, J. B. (2004). Life satisfaction and late-life liberal activism: Activity, continuity, and the role of identity politics. Politics of Change: Sexuality, Gender, & Aging Research in Political Sociology, 13, 113–138.Google Scholar
  49. Lawrence, C. F., Lovell, M. L., & Helfgott, J. B. (2004). The moral discourse of healing: Victims and offenders for restorative justice. Journal of Societal and Social Policy, 3(2), 49–64.Google Scholar
  50. Lovell, M. L., Helfgott, J. B., & Lawrence, C. F. (2002a). Narrative accounts from the citizens, victims, and offenders restoring justice program at the Washington state reformatory. Contemporary Justice Review, 5, 261–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lovell, M. L., Helfgott, J. B., & Lawrence, C. F. (2002b). Citizens, victims, and offenders restoring justice: Social group work bridging the divide. In S. Henry, J. East, & C. Schmitz (Eds.), Social work with groups. New York: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
  52. MacKenzie, M. (2007, May). Pigs on parade to kick off market centennial celebration. The Seattle Times. Retrieved from https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/special-reports/pigs-on-parade-to-kick-off-market-centennial-celebration/
  53. Miller, J. M., & Miller, H. V. (2016). Validating program fidelity: Lessons from the delaware county second chance initiatives. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 41, 112–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-015-9325-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Olsen, J. (1983). Son: A psychopath and his victims. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar
  55. Parkin, W., Helfgott, J. B., Collins, P., Messelu, K., & Krappen, E. (2015). Yesler terrace public safety plan final report. Seattle Housing Authority.Google Scholar
  56. Pike Place Market Foundation. (2001). Pigs on Parade. Seattle, WA: Marathon Group.Google Scholar
  57. Rule, A. (1987). Small sacrifices: A true story of passion and murder. New York: New American Library (NAL Books).Google Scholar
  58. Scott, C. K., Dennis, M. L., & Lurigio, A. J. (2014). Women’s participation in a jail-based treatment program in a large urban setting: A process evaluation. Criminal Justice Research Review. Offender Programs Report, 17(4), 49–59.Google Scholar
  59. Thomas, T. A., Collins-Camargo, C., & Boes, R. C. (2016). A process evaluation of a Kentucky court improvement initiative. Family Court Review, 54(3), 413–423. doi:10.1111/fcre.2016.54.issue-3Google Scholar
  60. Yochelson, S., & Samenow, S. E. (1976). The criminal personality (Vol. 1–3). New York: Jason Aronson, Inc.Google Scholar
  61. Yohannes, A. (2016). ‘The IF project’: New documentary asks inmates to reflect on missteps. NBC News. Retrieved from http://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/if-project-s-kim-bogucki-working-inmates-asking-what-if-n647666

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Seattle UniversitySeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations