Advertisement

Textual Analysis of Published Research Articles on the Environmental Impacts of Land-Use Change

  • Monia EL AkkariEmail author
  • Mélanie Sandoval
  • Sophie Le Perchec
  • Olivier Réchauchère
Chapter
Part of the Sustainable Agriculture Reviews book series (SARV, volume 30)

Abstract

Regardless of the scale considered, land use is determined by a variety of factors relating to both local soil and climatic conditions and socioeconomic considerations (population growth, food and energy requirements, public policies, etc.). Changes in land use resulting from shifts in these factors over time will have environmental consequences. We conducted a review of the scientific literature to identify the degree to which environmental assessments take direct and indirect land-use change into account. A textual analysis was completed on a collection of 5730 scientific articles, published between 1975 and 2015 and listed in the WoS™ database, addressing the relationship between reorganizations of agricultural and forestry systems, or spatial planning, direct and indirect land-use change resulting from these reorganizations; and environmental impacts. By identifying the most frequently used words or groups of words within this corpus (focusing on the title, abstract, and keywords fields), the textual analysis platform CorTexT Manager (Platform developed by IFRIS (the Institute for Research and Innovation in Society, based in the Paris region) assembles diagrams, or “maps,” of occurrence and co-occurrence for these terms, which can then be used to identify the principal themes addressed in the corpus based on clusters of proximate keywords. Eight clusters were so identified: two focused on climate change and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems (thus corresponding both to an aspect of the biophysical context and an environmental impact linked to a reorganization); one associated a reorganization (biofuel production) with a dominant environmental impact (the effects of greenhouse gas emissions); three were centered on keywords related to other types of reorganizations (urbanization, grassland management, forestry management); and two focused on environmental impacts on biodiversity and water resources. The five “thematic identifiers” showing the highest number of occurrences were greenhouse gas emission, land-use policy, biofuel, farm system, and pasture land, suggesting that the theme “GHG impacts of biofuel production” is the most prevalent. A more detailed textual analysis of articles in the cluster relating to non-food biomass production (1785 articles) was also conducted, and confirmed the growing importance, notably since 2005–2006, of research linking the bioenergy production, land-use change, and climate impacts from greenhouse gas emissions. Reorganizations toward non-food biomass production also help explain the presence of degraded lands among the most frequently occurring terms in the corpus. Life-cycle analysis is the most important assessment methodology used to evaluate the environmental impacts of bioenergy production.

Keywords

Textual analysis methodology Cortext Land-use change Bioenergy 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was completed as part of a project financed by ADEME (the French Environment and Energy Management Agency) and the French Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, under contract number 12-60-C0004. It was carried out under the direction of the Delegation for Foresight Studies and Scientific Assessment (DEPE), a division of the French National Institute for Agricultural Research (INRA). The authors would like to thank the research experts who assisted in assembling the list of thematic identifiers and interpreting the maps: Martial Bernoux, Antonio Bispo, Stéphane De Cara, Jean François Dhôte, Nathalie Frascaria-Lacoste, Benoît Gabrielle, Philippe Lescoat, David Makowski, and Bertrand Schmitt.

The authors would also like to thank two anonymous readers for their insightful comments, which made it possible to improve the quality of this article.

References

  1. De Cara S, Goussebaïle A, Grateau R, Levert F, Quemener J, Vermont B, Bureau J-C, Gabrielle B, Gohin A, Bispo A (2012) Revue critique des études évaluant l’effet des changements d’affectation des sols sur les bilans environnementaux des biocarburants. Ademe, Angers p 96Google Scholar
  2. MEA – Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: multiscale assessments: findings of the sub-global assessments working group. Island Press, Washington D.CGoogle Scholar
  3. Reboud X, Founie RD, Leiser H, Tatry M-V, Barbier M, Cointet J-P (2012) Analyse lexicale du corpus bibliométrique « agroécologie » au sens restreint. In: INRA (ed) Rapport INRA du chantier Agro-écologie, pp 85–87Google Scholar
  4. Réchauchère O, El Akkari M, Le Perchec S, Makowski D, Gabrielle B, Bispo A (this volume) An innovative methodological framework for analyzing existing scientific research on land-use change and associated environmental impacts. In: Réchauchère O, Bispo A, Gabrielle B, Makowski D (eds) Sustainable agriculture reviews, vol 30. Springer, ChamGoogle Scholar
  5. Sandoval M, Tarot C (2014) Etude bibliométrique sur les transitions nutritionnelles. Les transitions nutritionnelles dans la littérature scientifique internationale. Méthodologie (démarche d’exploration) et résultats d’analyses. Rapport de l’étude bibliométrique sur l’axe 6 du MP GloFoodSGoogle Scholar
  6. Searchinger T, Heimlich R, Houghton RA, Dong FX, Elobeid A, Fabiosa J, Tokgoz S, Hayes D, Yu TH (2008) Use of US croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science 319(5867):1238–1240.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1151861 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Tancoigne E, Barbier M, Cointet J-P, Richard G (2014) Les services écosystémiques dans la littérature scientifique : démarche d’exploration et résultats d’analyse, p 69Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Monia EL Akkari
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mélanie Sandoval
    • 2
  • Sophie Le Perchec
    • 3
  • Olivier Réchauchère
    • 4
  1. 1.EcoSysAgroParisTech – INRAThiverval-GrignonFrance
  2. 2.SAE2INRARennes CedexFrance
  3. 3.DISTINRARennes CedexFrance
  4. 4.DEPE (Unit for Collective Scientific Expertise, Foresight and Advanced Studies)INRAParisFrance

Personalised recommendations