Advertisement

Legitimacy pp 83-103 | Cite as

Legitimating Poverty: The Minimum Guaranteed Income Pilot Case

  • Manos Spyridakis
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Urban Anthropology book series (PSUA)

Abstract

As Western societies experience growing insecurity, full employment wanes, as do social protection state spending for job creation. Spyridakis’ ethnography of greater Athens suggests that political decisions are not accepted uncritically or unconditionally. How people experience their citizenship in this situation raises challenging questions not only on the legitimacy of power structures such as governmental regulations and public policies but also on the way in which ordinary people, as well as business people hit by the crisis, use and conceive them. The discussion addresses the extent to which different informants relate to the unequal allocation of resources and their sense of shared adversity.

References

  1. Armano, E., A. Bove, and A. Murgia, eds. 2017. Mapping Precariousness, Labour Insecurity and Uncertain Livelihoods. Subjectivities and Resistance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Atalay, Z.N. 2018. Legal but not Legitimate: The Changing Practices of Financial Citizenship in Turkey. In Legitimacy: Ethnographic and Theoretical Insights, ed. I. Pardo and G.B. Prato, Chapter 5. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  3. Bailey, D. 2006. Governance or the Crisis of Governmentality? Applying Critical State Theory at the European Level. Journal of European Public policy 13 (1): 16–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Comaroff, J., and J. Comaroff. 2000. Millennial Capitalism: First Thoughts on a Second Coming. Public Culture 12 (2): 291–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dimoulas, C. 2017. The Implementation of Social Solidarity Income in Greece. Social Policy 7: 7–24 (in Greek).Google Scholar
  6. ———. 2018. Crisis and Social Solidarity Income. In Crisis, Social Policy, Social Impasses and Solutions, ed. I. Kouzis and C. Dimoulas, 1–18. Athens: Topos.Google Scholar
  7. Durrenberger, P., ed. 2017. Uncertain Times. Anthropological Approaches to Labor in a Neoliberal World. Colorado: University Press of Colorado.Google Scholar
  8. Fourcade, M. 2007. Theories of Market and Theories of Society. American Behavioral Scientists 50 (8): 1015–1034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Greek Parliament. 2014. Minimum Income Policies in the E.U. and in Greece: A Comparative Analysis. Athens.Google Scholar
  10. Kapferer, B. 2005. New Formations of Power, the Oligarchic-corporate State and Anthropological Ideological Discourse. Anthropological theory 5 (3): 285–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kretsos, L. 2014. Youth Policy in Austerity Europe: The Case of Greece. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth 19 (S1): 35–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Matheson, G. 1987. Weber and the Classification of Forms of Legitimacy. The British Journal of Sociology 38 (2): 199–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Newman, K. 1999. Falling from Grace. Downward Mobility in the Age of Affluence. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  14. OECD. 2013. Crisis Squeezes Income and Puts Pressure on Inequality and Poverty. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  15. Pardo, I. 2000. Introduction. Morals of Legitimacy: Interplay between responsibility, Authority and Trust. In Morals of Legitimacy. Between Agency and System, ed. I. Pardo, 1–26. Oxford: Berghahn.Google Scholar
  16. ———. 2018. Governance without Legitimacy: An Italian Conundrum of Democracy. In Legitimacy: Ethnographic and Theoretical Insights, ed. I. Pardo and G.B. Prato, Chapter 3. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  17. Pardo, I., and G.B. Prato. 2011. Introduction: Disconnected Governance and the Crisis of Legitimacy. In Citizenship and the Legitimacy of Governance: Anthropology in the Mediterranean Region, ed. I. Pardo and G.B. Prato, 1–23. Farnham: Ashgate (Now Published by Routledge).Google Scholar
  18. Pena Casas, R. 2006. Minimum Income Standards in Enlarged EU: Guaranteed Minimum Income Schemes. Setting Minimum Social Standards Across Europe, Working Paper II. EAPN.Google Scholar
  19. Prato, G.B. 2018. On the Legitimacy of Democratic Representation: Two Case Studies from Europe. In Legitimacy: Ethnographic and Theoretical Insights, ed. I. Pardo and G.B. Prato, Chapter 2. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  20. Schmitt, C. 2004. Legality and Legitimacy. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shore, C., and S. Wright. 1997. Introduction. Policy: A New Field of Anthropology. In Anthropology of Policy. Critical Perspectives on Governance and Power, ed. C. Shore and S. Wright, 3–34. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Spyridakis, M. 2011. Between Structure and Action: Contested Legitimacies and Labour Processes in the Piraeus. In Citizenship and the Legitimacy of Governance: Anthropology in the Mediterranean Region, ed. I. Pardo and G.B. Prato, 153–171. Farnham: Ashgate (Now Published by Routledge).Google Scholar
  23. ———. 2013. The Liminal Worker. An Ethnography of Work, Unemployment and Precariousness in Contemporary Greece. Farnham: Ashgate (Now Published by Routledge).Google Scholar
  24. Storper, M. 2000. Lived Effects of the Contemporary Economy: Globalization, Inequality, and Consumer Society. Public Culture 12 (2): 275–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Vilaplana, C.L. 2013. Population and Social Conditions. Luxemburg: Eurostat, Statistics in Focus 4.Google Scholar
  26. Wedel, J.R., C. Shore, G. Feldman, and S. Lathrop. 2005. Toward an Anthropology of Public Policy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 600: 30–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manos Spyridakis
    • 1
  1. 1.University of the PeloponneseCorinthGreece

Personalised recommendations