Advertisement

The Ecosystem Service Concept: Linking Ecosystems and Human Wellbeing

  • Matthias SchröterEmail author
  • Irene Ring
  • Christoph Schröter-Schlaack
  • Aletta Bonn
Chapter

Abstract

Which ecosystem services are addressed? General introduction to the ecosystem service concept.

Keywords

Concept Components Cascade Boundary object Conservation 

References

  1. 1.
    Reid WV. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis: a report of the millenium ecosystems assessment. Washington DC: Island Press; 2005.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ehrlich PR, Ehrlich A. Extinction: the causes and consequences of the disappearance of species. New York: Random House; 1981.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    von Haaren C, Albert C. Integrating ecosystem services and environmental planning: limitations and synergies. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manage. 2011;7(3):150–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    de Groot RS. Functions of nature: evaluation of nature in environmental planning, management and decision making. Dordrecht: Wolters-Noordhoff; 1992.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Daily GC. Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Washington DC: Island Press; 1997.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Costanza R, d'Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature. 1997;387(6630):253–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    TEEB. The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: mainstreaming the economics of nature: asynthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB 2010. http://doc.teebweb.org/wp-content/uploads/Study%20and%20Reports/Reports/Synthesis%20report/TEEB%20Synthesis%20Report%202010.pdf
  8. 8.
    Convention on Biological Diversity. COP 10 Decision X/2. Strategic plan for biodiversity 2011–2020. https://www.cbd.int/decision/cop/?id=12268. Accessed 1 Oct 2017.
  9. 9.
    European Commission. Our life insurance, our natural capital: an EU biodiversity strategy to 2020. COM(2011) 244. Brussels, Belgium: 2011. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A52011DC0244. Accessed 1 Oct 2017.
  10. 10.
    Schröter M, Albert C, Marques A, Tobon W, Lavorel S, Maes J, et al. National ecosystem assessments in Europe: a review. BioScience. 2016;66(10):813–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Spangenberg JH, Görg C, Truong DT, Tekken V, Bustamante JV, Settele J. Provision of ecosystem services is determined by human agency, not ecosystem functions. Four case studies. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manage. 2014;10(1):40–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Goldman RL, Tallis H, Kareiva P, Daily GC. Field evidence that ecosystem service projects support biodiversity and diversify options. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(27):9445–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Abson DJ, von Wehrden H, Baumgärtner S, Fischer J, Hanspach J, Härdtle W, et al. Ecosystem services as a boundary object for sustainability. Ecol Econ. 2014;103(0):29–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Norgaard RB. Ecosystem services: from eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder. Ecol Econ. 2010;69(6):1219–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Raymond CM, Singh GG, Benessaiah K, Bernhardt JR, Levine J, Nelson H, et al. Ecosystem services and beyond: using multiple metaphors to understand human-environment relationships. BioScience. 2013;63(7):536–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Díaz S, Demissew S, Carabias J, Joly C, Lonsdale M, Ash N, et al. The IPBES conceptual framework—connecting nature and people. Curr Opin Environ Sustainability. 2015;14(0):1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Maes J, Hauck J, Paracchini ML, Ratamäki O, Hutchins M, Termansen M, et al. Mainstreaming ecosystem services into EU policy. Curr Opin Environ Sustainability. 2013;5(1):128–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jacobs S, Dendoncker N, Martín-López B, Barton DN, Gomez-Baggethun E, Boeraeve F, et al. A new valuation school: integrating diverse values of nature in resource and land use decisions. Ecosyst Serv. 2016;22(Part B):213–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ricketts TH, Watson KB, Koh I, Ellis AM, Nicholson CC, Posner S, et al. Disaggregating the evidence linking biodiversity and ecosystem services. Nat Commun. 2016;7:13106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Maron M, Mitchell MGE, Runting RK, Rhodes JR, Mace GM, Keith DA, et al. Towards a threat assessment framework for ecosystem services. Trends Ecol Evol. 2017;32(4):240–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ring I, Wüstemann H, Bonn A, Grunewald K, Hampicke U, Hartje V, et al. Methodische Grundlagen zu Ökosystemleistungen und ökonomischer Bewertung. In: Hartje V, Wüstemann H, Bonn A, editors. Naturkapital Deutschland—TEEB DE: Naturkapital und Klimapolitik—Synergien und Konflikte. Berlin, Leipzig: TU Berlin, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung; 2015. p. 20–64.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Barton DN, Ring I, Rusch G. Policyscapes: nature-based policy mixes for biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services provision. Policy Brief. 2014;2 http://policymix.nina.no/News/News-article/ArticleId/3464/Policyscapes-Nature-based-policy-mixes-for-biodiversity-conservation

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthias Schröter
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Irene Ring
    • 3
  • Christoph Schröter-Schlaack
    • 4
  • Aletta Bonn
    • 1
    • 2
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Ecosystem ServicesHelmholtz Centre for Environmental Research–UFZLeipzigGermany
  2. 2.German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-LeipzigLeipzigGermany
  3. 3.International Institute (IHI) ZittauTechnische Universität DresdenZittauGermany
  4. 4.Department of EconomicsHelmholtz Centre for Environmental Research–UFZLeipzigGermany
  5. 5.Institute of BiodiversityFriedrich Schiller University JenaJenaGermany

Personalised recommendations