Network Patterns: Combining Features

  • Rajee Kanagavel


This chapter describes the media patterns observed among international students. Each network exhibits a different pattern of relationships and media used for maintaining contact. Four different network patterns are formed by combining profiles of media use along with the structural and compositional network characteristics. These four patterns are: Like or Follow me (transnational networks with extensive use of social media), Let’s meet asap :) (local networks where face-to-face contact is the most prevalent), FaceTime or Skype? (small, dense networks of strong ties, where email and Skype are often used), and Where’s the party tonight? (large, sparse networks of weaker ties, with low media use). The chapter examines numerous aspects of the international students’ networks and also demonstrates how these networks influence the exchange of social support.


  1. Boase, J. (2008). Personal networks and the personal communication system: Using multiple media to connect. Information, Communication & Society, 11(4), 490–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Campbell, K. E., Marsden, P. V., & Hurlbert, J. S. (1986). Social resources and socioeconomic status. Social Networks, 8(1), 97–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Freeman, L. (2004). The development of social network analysis: A study in the sociology of science. Vancouver, CA: Empirical Press.Google Scholar
  4. Herz, A. (2015). Relational constitution of social support in migrants’ transnational personal communities. Social Networks, 40, 64–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hogan, B. J. (2009). Networking in everyday life. Toronto, ON, Canada: University of Toronto.Google Scholar
  6. Lubbers, M. J., Molina, J. L., & McCarty, C. (2007). Personal networks and ethnic identifications the case of migrants in Spain. International Sociology, 22(6), 721–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. McCabe, J. M. (2016). Connecting in college: How friendship networks matter for academic and social success. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Walther, J. B., & Boyd, S. (2002). Attraction to computer-mediated social support. In C. A. Lin & D. Atkin (Eds.), Communication technology and society: Audience adoption and uses (pp. 153–188). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.Google Scholar
  9. Wellman, B. (1979). The community question: The intimate networks of East Yorkers. American Journal of Sociology, 84(5), 1201–1231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Wellman, B. (1988). The community question re-evaluated. In M. P. Smith (Ed.), Power, community and the city (pp. 81–107). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
  11. Wellman, B., & Potter, S. (1999). The elements of personal communities. In B. Wellman (Ed.), Networks in the global village (pp. 49–82). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rajee Kanagavel
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Social SciencesSingapore Management UniversitySingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations