• Rajee Kanagavel


The introductory chapter discusses the importance of social relationships for various supportive functions over varying distances, and whether co-presence is necessary for students to support one another. The proliferation of new communication technologies has radically transformed the functioning of social relationships. There is a lack of core knowledge on how digital media affect personal relationships and processes of social support. The chapter reviews research that uses the social network approach to study transnational social support. It also introduces the novel research study, including the personal and socio-economic characteristics of the sample of international students.


  1. Altbach, P. G., Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L. (2009). Trends in global higher education: Tracking an academic revolution: A report prepared for the UNESCO 2009 world conference on higher education. UNESCO.Google Scholar
  2. Bilecen, B. (2014). International student mobility and transnational friendships. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  3. Bilecen, B., Gamper, M., & Lubbers, M. J. (2018). The missing link: Social network analysis in migration and transnationalism. Social Networks, 53, 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boase, J., & Wellman, B. (2006). Personal relationships: On and off the Internet. In A. L. Vangelisti & D. Perlman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (Vol. 8, pp. 709–723). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bojarczuk, S., & Mühlau, P. (2018). Mobilising social network support for childcare: The case of Polish migrant mothers in Dublin. Social Networks, 53, 101–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cachia, R., & Jariego, I. M. (2018). Mobility types, transnational ties and personal networks in four highly skilled immigrant communities in Seville (Spain). Social Networks, 53, 111–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chambon, A., Schröer, W., & Schweppe, C. (Eds.). (2013). Transnational social support (Vol. 7). Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Choi, J. H., & Danowski, J. A. (2002). Making a global community on the net – Global village or global metropolis?: A Network analysis of usenet newsgroups. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 7(3), JCMC735.Google Scholar
  9. Hampton, K., & Wellman, B. (2002). The not so global village of Netville. In B. Wellman & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Internet in everyday life (pp. 345–371). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Haythornthwaite, C. (2000). Online personal networks: Size, composition and media use among distance learners. New Media & Society, 2(2), 195–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Herz, A. (2015). Relational constitution of social support in migrants’ transnational personal communities. Social Networks, 40, 64–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hlebec, V., Manfreda, K. L., & Vehovar, V. (2006). The social support networks of internet users. New Media & Society, 8(1), 9–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. King, R., Findlay, A., & Ahrens, J. (2010). International student mobility literature review.Google Scholar
  14. Madianou, M., & Miller, D. (2013). Migration and new media: Transnational families and polymedia. Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Miyata, K. (2002). Social support for Japanese mothers online and offline. In B. Wellman & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The internet in everyday life (pp. 520–548). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mok, D., Wellman, B., & Carrasco, J. (2010). Does distance matter in the age of the internet? Urban Studies, 47(13), 2747–2783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mouw, T., Chavez, S., Edelblute, H., & Verdery, A. (2014). Binational social networks and assimilation: A test of the importance of transnationalism. Social Problems, 61(3), 329–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Poyrazli, S. (2003). Ethnic identity and psychosocial adjustment among international students. Psychological Reports, 92(2), 512–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pries, L. (2007). Transnationalism: Trendy catch-all or specific research programme? A proposal for transnational organisation studies as a micro-macro-link.Google Scholar
  20. Programme for International Student Assessment. (2011). PISA 2009 at a Glance. OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  21. Rizvi, F. (2005). International education and the production of cosmopolitan identities. In Transnational Seminar Series.Google Scholar
  22. Schiller, N. G., Basch, L., & Blanc, C. S. (1995). From immigrant to transmigrant: Theorizing transnational migration. Anthropological Quarterly, 68, 48–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shumow, M. (2010). A foot in both worlds: Transnationalism and media use among Venezuelan immigrants in South Florida. International Journal of Communication, 4, 21.Google Scholar
  24. Vaux, A. (1988). Social support: Theory, research, and intervention. Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
  25. Verdery, A. M., Mouw, T., Edelblute, H., & Chavez, S. (2018). Communication flows and the durability of a transnational social field. Social Networks, 53, 57–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications (Vol. 8). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Wellman, B., & Berkowitz, S. D. (Eds.). (1988). Social structures: A network approach (Vol. 2). CUP Archive.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rajee Kanagavel
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Social SciencesSingapore Management UniversitySingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations