Advertisement

Impact of the Dismantling of the Multi-Fiber Agreement in the Export Processing Zones of Mauritius

  • Jaysen Ramasamy
Chapter
Part of the Contemporary African Political Economy book series (CONTAPE)

Abstract

Mauritius is one of the countries that benefited from the Multi-Fibre Agreement (MFA) during the 1980s and 1990s. With the creation of the World Trade Organization in 1995 and the gradual dismantling of MFA until 2005, it was expected that net welfare losses would accrue for Mauritius. Difference-in-difference estimates are used to compare changes in the textiles and apparel sectors. The results show that although the removal of preferences had a negative impact, it was less than what might have been expected. The treatment (T) coefficient was not significant, meaning that exports in the treatment group did not change by a significant percentage after the preferences had been removed. The role played by the African Growth and Opportunity Act in redefining the export potential of Mauritius towards the US and the diversification of exports to non-EU markets played a pivotal role for coping with difficulties experienced with exports to the EU after 2005.

References

  1. Boyenge, J. P. (2007). ILO database on export processing zones (Revised). Sectoral Activities Department, International Labour Office. Geneva: International Labour Organization.Google Scholar
  2. Currie, J., & Harrison, A. E. (1997). Sharing the costs: The impact of trade reform on capital and labor in Morocco. Journal of Labor Economics, 15(3), 44–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Davies, R. B., & Vadlamannati, K. C. (2013). A race to the bottom in labour standards? An empirical investigation. Journal of Development Economics, 10(3), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Evans, C., & Harrigan, J. (2004). Tight clothing: How the MFA affects Asian apparel exports. NBER Working Paper No. 10250. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  5. Francois, J., & Spinanger, D. (2004). Liberalizing quotas on textiles and clothing: Has the ATC actually worked? 7th annual conference on global economic analysis, 17–19 June 2004, Washington, DC [Online]. Retrieved from https://www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu/resources/download/1902.pdf.
  6. Goliath, D. (2009). Mauritius facing up to China. African Economic Conference, 11–13 November, United Nations Conference Centre, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
  7. Gray, S. (1995). Findings, Africa Region No.37. Industry and Energy Division, Central Africa and Indian Ocean Department, World Bank Group. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  8. Iman, P., & Minoiu, C. (2011). The equilibrium exchange rate of Mauritius: Evidence from two structural models. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 47(6), 134–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Moreira, M., & Najberg, S. (2000). Trade liberalisation in Brazil: Creating or exporting jobs? Journal of Development Studies, 36(3), 78–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Naumann, E. (2006). The multifibre agreement, WTO agreement on textiles and clothing. Tralac Working Paper No 4/2006. Geneva: WTO.Google Scholar
  11. Pages-Serra, C., & Gustavo Marquez, G. (1998). Trade and employment: Evidence from Latin America and the Caribbean. RES Working Paper No. 4108. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
  12. Rama, M. (1994). The labor market and trade reform in manufacturing. In M. Connolly & J. de Melo (Eds.), The effects of protectionism on a small country: The case of Uruguay (pp. 108–123). Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  13. Revenga, A. (1997). Employment and wage effects of trade liberalization: The case of Mexican manufacturing. Journal of Labor Economics, 15(3), 20–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rivera, S. A., Laurie-Ann, A., & Judith, D. (2004). Africa beyond 2005: Understanding the impact of eliminating NTBs and tariffs on textiles and clothing. Paper read at Sixth Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis, The Hague, The Netherlands, June 2003.Google Scholar
  15. UNCTAD. (2005a). TNCs and the removal of textiles and clothing quotas. UNCTAD/ITE/IIA/2005/1. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. New York and Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar
  16. UNCTAD. (2005b). Training module on trade in textiles and clothing. The post-ATC context. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. New York and Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar
  17. Wacziarg, R., & Wallack, J. S. (2004). Trade liberalization and intersectoral labor movements. Journal of International Economics, 64(2), 411–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. World Bank. (2009). International bank for reconstruction and development: Globalisation, wages and the quality of jobs – five country studies. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  19. World Trade Organisation. [Online]. Available: https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/agrm5_e.htm.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jaysen Ramasamy
    • 1
  1. 1.Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International TradePort LouisMauritius

Personalised recommendations