Advertisement

Quality of Care in Perioperative Medicine

  • Matthew R. Eng
  • Tayyab Khan
  • Ramla Farooq
Chapter

Abstract

Quality of care in anesthesiology is the result of progressive thinking by industrial quality management and pioneers of quality management in medicine. Prevention of catastrophic perioperative complications involves meticulous tracking of perioperative events. This includes continuous monitoring of perioperative events, collecting data, implementing changes, and noticing trends in the data that can help to prevent these events from occurring. This can occur through a targeted quality improvement program implementation. A robust quality improvement system identifies underperformance either by systems, individuals, or equipment and allows for interventions before complications occur.

Keywords

Perioperative safety Quality of care Quality management Quality improvement Adverse outcomes 

References

  1. 1.
    Cooper JB, Gaba D. No myth: anesthesia is a model for addressing patient safety. Anesthesiology. 2002;97(6):1335–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Deming WE. Out of the crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1986.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bindman AB, Grumbach K, Keane D, Rauch L, Luce JM. Consequences of queuing for care at a public hospital emergency department. JAMA. 1991;266(8):1091–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1966;44(3):166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stoelting RK, Khuri SF. Past accomplishments and future directions: risk prevention in anesthesia and surgery. Anesthesiol Clin. 2006;24(2):235–53. v.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hallinan JT. Heal thyself: once seen as risky, one group of doctors changes its ways. Wall St J. 2005;21:1.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Standards for basic anesthetic monitoring [Internet]. American Society of Anesthesiologists. Available from: www.asahq.org
  8. 8.
    Leape LL. Reporting of adverse events. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(20):1633–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Milch CE, Salem DN, Pauker SG, Lundquist TG, Kumar S, Chen J. Voluntary electronic reporting of medical errors and adverse events. An analysis of 92,547 reports from 26 acute care hospitals. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(2):165–70.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Conceptual Framework for the international classification for patient safety [Internet]. WHO/IER/PSP. 2009. Available from: http://www.who.int/patientsafety/taxonomy/icps_full_report.pdf
  11. 11.
    Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. From the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Med J Aust. 2014;200(5):246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jehring J, Heinrich HW. Industrial accident prevention: a scientific approach. Ind Labor Relat Rev. 1951;4(4):609.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Guffey PJ, Culwick M, Merry AF. Incident reporting at the local and national level. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2014;52(1):69–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Percarpio KB, Vince Watts B, Weeks WB. The effectiveness of root cause analysis: what does the literature tell us? Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2008;34(7):391–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Reason J. Human error: models and management. BMJ. 2000;320(7237):768–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pitblado R, Weijand P. Barrier diagram (bow tie) quality issues for operating managers. Process Saf Prog. 2014;33(4):355–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    ISMP. Medication errors reporting program. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2010;50(2):e70–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dutton RP. Why have a quality management program? Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2013;51(4):1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dutton RP, Dukatz A. Quality improvement using automated data sources: the anesthesia quality institute. Anesthesiol Clin. 2011;29(3):439–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rodrigues R, Trigg L, Schmidt AE, Leichsenring K. The public gets what the public wants: experiences of public reporting in long-term care in Europe. Health Policy. 2014;116(1):84–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Iezzoni LI. The risks of risk adjustment. JAMA. 1997;278(19):1600–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthew R. Eng
    • 1
  • Tayyab Khan
    • 2
  • Ramla Farooq
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of AnesthesiologyLSU Health Science Center, University Medical Center New OrleansNew OrleansUSA
  2. 2.Town Square Anesthesia, Community First Medical CenterChicagoUSA
  3. 3.Department of Family MedicineJackson Park HospitalChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations