Advertisement

Surgical Management: Vagotomy and Pyloroplasty

  • Nathan G. LaFayette
  • Jennifer S. SchwartzEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Most indications for vagotomy and pyloroplasty (VP) are of historical importance, with proton pump inhibitors and eradicating H. pylori all but making the aforementioned obsolete. A bleeding duodenal ulcer, a perforated duodenal/gastric ulcer, an obstructing pyloric channel/duodenal ulcer, and intractable pain from peptic ulcer disease remain indications for such a procedure. The Heineke-Mikulicz approach is best for routine cases, whereas the Finney pyloroplasty is best suited for a J-shaped stomach laying in the longitudinal axis. In the most severe cases of inflammation and scarring of the pylorus, a Jaboulay gastroduodenostomy may be employed which bypasses the pylorus entirely. All described pyloroplasties may be accomplished laparoscopically, and each technique mirrors the open approach and should be attempted by those skilled at laparoscopy. Complications related to the pyloroplasty include dumping syndrome, bile reflux gastritis, inadequate drainage vs. delayed GI function, and leaks. A number of prospective, randomized trials comparing the various surgical options have a reported mortality rate of 0.5–0.8%.

Keywords

Pyloroplasty Vagotomy Heineke-Mikulicz Finney Jaboulay 

References

  1. 1.
    Lagoo J, Pappas TN, Perez A. A relic or still relevant: the narrowing role for vagotomy in the treatment of peptic ulcer disease. Am J Surg. 2014;207(1):120–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    de la Fuente SG, Khuri SF, Schifftner T, et al. Comparative analysis of vagotomy and drainage versus vagotomy and resection procedures for bleeding peptic ulcer disease: results of 907 patients from the Department of Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;202:78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jordan PH Jr, Thornby J. Perforated pyloroduodenal ulcers. Long-term results with omental patch closure and parietal cell vagotomy. Ann Surg. 1995;221:479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Csendes A, Maluenda F, Braghetto I, et al. Prospective randomized study comparing three surgical techniques for the treatment of gastric outlet obstruction secondary to duodenal ulcer. Am J Surg. 1993;166:45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zollinger RM, Zollinger RM. Atlas of surgical operations. New York: McGraw-Hill, Health Professions Division; 1993.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Evans SR, Chahine AA. Surgical pitfalls: prevention and management. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders/Elsevier; 2009.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Johnston D. Operative mortality and postoperative morbidity of highly selective vagotomy. Br Med J. 1975;4:545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hejazi RA, Patil H, McCallum RW. Dumping syndrome: establishing criteria for diagnosis and identifying new etiologies. Dig Dis Sci. 2010;55:117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Frederiksen HJ, Johansen TS, Christiansen PM. Postvagotomy diarrhoea and dumping treated with reconstruction of the pylorus. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1980;15:245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Greenfield LJ, Mulholland MW. Surgery: scientific principles and practice. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Weinberg JA, Stempien SJ, Movius HJ, Dagradi AE. Vagotomy and pyloroplasty in the treatment of duodenal ulcer. Am J Surg. 1956;92(2):202–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SAGES 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SurgeryThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical CenterColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations