Advertisement

Surgical Management: Truncal, Selective, and Highly Selective Vagotomy

  • Leena KhaitanEmail author
  • Adil Haleem Khan
Chapter

Abstract

Peptic ulcer disease is a common cause of epigastric pain. In the past surgery used to be common in the management of the disease. However, with advancement in medical management of peptic ulcer disease, surgical management has been limited to emergent management of the disease in cases of bleeding and perforation. However surgeon should still be familiar with the relevant physiology and anatomy to manage the disease in adequate fashion. In this chapter we discuss clinically relevant physiology of gastric acid secretion and basic anatomical concepts. We describe minimally invasive approach to perform vagotomies. We then discuss our approach to post-op surgical management and finally briefly discuss the post-op complications associated with surgery.

Keywords

Gastric acid Vagus nerve Peptic ulcer disease Truncal vagotomy Selective vagotomy Highly selective vagotomy 

References

  1. 1.
    Martin RF. Surgical management of ulcer disease. Surg Clin North Am. 2005;85(5):907–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Steger AC. Remaining indications for vagotomy with drainage or antrectomy in duodenal ulcer. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1987;69(1):24–6.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Soybel DI. Anatomy and physiology of the stomach. Surg Clin North Am. 2005;85(5):875–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baccaro LM, et al. Anatomy of the anterior vagus nerve: an anatomic description and its application in surgery. Anat Physiol. 2013;3:2161-0940.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jackson RG. Anatomy of the vagus nerves in the region of the lower esophagus and the stomach. Anat Rec. 1949;103(1):1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Casas AT, Gadacz TR. Laparoscopic management of peptic ulcer disease. Surg Clin North Am. 1996;76(3):515–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Laws HL, JB MK. Endoscopic management of peptic ulcer disease. Ann Surg. 1993;217(5):548–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Thompson JC, Fender HR, Watson LC, Villar HV, et al. Ann Surg. 1976;183(5):599–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hoffmann J, Jensen HE, Christiansen J, Olesen A, Loud FB, Hauch O. Prospective controlled vagotomy trial for duodenal ulcer. Results after 11-15 years. Ann Surg. 1989;209(1):40–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Koo J, Lam SK, Chan P, Lee NW, Lam P, Wong J, Ong GB. Proximal gastric vagotomy, truncal vagotomy with drainage and truncal vagotomy with antrectomy for chronic duodenal ulcer. A prospective, randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 1983;197(3):265–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Herrington JL Jr, Sawyers JL. Results of elective duodenal ulcer surgery in women: comparison of truncal vagotomy and antrectomy, gastric selective vagotomy and pyloroplasty, proximal gastric vagotomy. Ann Surg. 1978;187(5):576–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Taylor TV. Postvagotomy and cholecystectomy syndrome. Ann Surg. 1981;194(5):625–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Goligher JC, Hill GL, Kenny TE, Nutter E. Proximal gastric vagotomy without drainage for duodenal ulcer: results after 5-8 years. Br J Surg. 1978;65(3):145–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SAGES 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Metabolic and Bariatric Program, Department of SurgeryUniversity HospitalsClevelandUSA
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryUniversity Hospitals, Cleveland Medical CenterClevelandUSA

Personalised recommendations