Advertisement

Expert Commentary: Laparoscopic Versus Endoscopic Myotomy for Achalasia

  • Ezra N. Teitelbaum
  • Lee L. Swanstrom
Chapter

Abstract

Achalasia is the most common primary esophageal motility disorder, resulting from an immune-mediated loss of neurons of the myenteric plexus of the esophagus. This neuronal death causes a failure of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) relaxation and esophageal body peristalsis with swallowing, leading to symptoms of dysphagia, regurgitation, chest pain, and weight loss. Unfortunately, there is no therapy that can restore normal EGJ and esophageal body function in patients with achalasia. Current treatment modalities seek to palliate symptoms by decreasing the resting tone of the EGJ, which allows for passive transit of food boluses into the stomach. Medications are generally ineffective in producing more than a transient and minimal improvement in symptoms, and therefore procedural interventions that mechanically disrupt the muscle fibers of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) form the mainstay of modern treatment.

Keywords

Endoscopic myotomy Achalasia Endoscopic pneumatic dilation Laparoscopic Heller myotomy Peroral endoscopic myotomy POEM 

References

  1. 1.
    Boeckxstaens GE, Zaninotto G, Richter JE. Achalasia. Lancet. 2014;383:83–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boeckxstaens GE, Annese V, des Varannes SB, et al. Pneumatic dilation versus laparoscopic Heller’s myotomy for idiopathic achalasia. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1807–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Moonen A, Annese V, Belmans A, et al. Long-term results of the European achalasia trial: a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing pneumatic dilation versus laparoscopic Heller myotomy. Gut. 2016;65:732–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yaghoobi M, Mayrand S, Martel M, Roshan-Afshar I, Bijarchi R, Barkun A. Laparoscopic Heller’s myotomy versus pneumatic dilation in the treatment of idiopathic achalasia: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;78:468–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schoenberg MB, Marx S, Kersten JF, et al. Laparoscopic Heller myotomy versus endoscopic balloon dilatation for the treatment of achalasia: a network meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2013;258:943–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sawas T, Ravi K, Geno DM, et al. The course of achalasia one to four decades after initial treatment. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017;45:553–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hungness ES, Sternbach JM, Teitelbaum EN, Kahrilas PJ, Pandolfino JE, Soper NJ. Per-oral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) after the learning curve: durable long-term results with a low complication rate. Ann Surg. 2016;264:508–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Inoue H, Sato H, Ikeda H, et al. Per-oral endoscopic myotomy: a series of 500 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;221:256–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sharata AM, Dunst CM, Pescarus R, et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal primary motility disorders: analysis of 100 consecutive patients. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;19:161–70. discussion 70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Awaiz A, Yunus RM, Khan S, Memon B, Memon MA. Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) and Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy (LHM) for achalasia. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017;27:123–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schlottmann F, Luckett DJ, Fine J, Shaheen NJ, Patti MG. Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy versus Peroral endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) for achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2017;267(3):451–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Patel K, Abbassi-Ghadi N, Markar S, Kumar S, Jethwa P, Zaninotto G. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of esophageal achalasia: systematic review and pooled analysis. Dis Esophagus. 2016;29:807–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ward MA, Gitelis M, Patel L, Vigneswaran Y, Carbray J, Ujiki MB. Outcomes in patients with over 1-year follow-up after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). Surg Endosc. 2017;31:1550–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bhayani NH, Kurian AA, Dunst CM, Sharata AM, Rieder E, Swanstrom LL. A comparative study on comprehensive, objective outcomes of laparoscopic Heller myotomy with per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia. Ann Surg. 2014;259:1098–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nabi Z, Ramchandani M, Chavan R, et al. Per-oral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia cardia: outcomes in over 400 consecutive patients. Endosc Int Open. 2017;5:E331–E9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Werner YB, Costamagna G, Swanstrom LL, et al. Clinical response to peroral endoscopic myotomy in patients with idiopathic achalasia at a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Gut. 2016;65:899–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Teitelbaum EN, Dunst CM, Reavis KM, et al. Clinical outcomes five years after POEM for treatment of primary esophageal motility disorders. Surg Endosc. 2017;32(1):421–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rohof WO, Hirsch DP, Kessing BF, Boeckxstaens GE. Efficacy of treatment for patients with achalasia depends on the distensibility of the esophagogastric junction. Gastroenterology. 2012;143:328–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Teitelbaum EN, Soper NJ, Pandolfino JE, et al. Esophagogastric junction distensibility measurements during Heller myotomy and POEM for achalasia predict postoperative symptomatic outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:522–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Teitelbaum EN, Soper NJ, Santos BF, et al. Symptomatic and physiologic outcomes one year after peroral esophageal myotomy (POEM) for treatment of achalasia. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:3359–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rawlings A, Soper NJ, Oelschlager B, et al. Laparoscopic dor versus Toupet fundoplication following Heller myotomy for achalasia: results of a multicenter, prospective, randomized-controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:18–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Richards WO, Torquati A, Holzman MD, et al. Heller myotomy versus Heller myotomy with Dor fundoplication for achalasia: a prospective randomized double-blind clinical trial. Ann Surg. 2004;240:405–12. discussion 12-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kumbhari V, Tieu AH, Onimaru M, et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) vs laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) for the treatment of Type III achalasia in 75 patients: a multicenter comparative study. Endosc Int Open. 2015;3:E195–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SAGES 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ezra N. Teitelbaum
    • 1
  • Lee L. Swanstrom
    • 2
  1. 1.Northwestern UniversityChicagoUSA
  2. 2.The Oregon ClinicPortlandUSA

Personalised recommendations