Advertisement

SAGES University MASTERS PROGRAM: Foregut Pathway

  • Daniel B. JonesEmail author
  • Linda Schultz
  • Brian Jacob
Chapter

Abstract

The Masters Program organizes educational materials along clinical pathways into discrete blocks of content which could be accessed by a surgeon attending the SAGES annual meeting or by logging into the online SAGES University (Fig. 1.1) [1]. The SAGES Masters Program currently has eight pathways including Acute Care, Biliary, Bariatrics, Colon, Foregut, Hernia, Flex Endoscopy, and Robotic Surgery (Fig. 1.2). Each pathway is divided into three levels of targeted performance: competency, proficiency, and mastery (Fig. 1.3). The levels originate from the Dreyfus model of skill acquisition [2], which has five stages: novice, advanced beginner, competency, proficiency, and expertise. The SAGES MASTERS Program is based on the three more advanced stages of skill acquisition: competency, proficiency, and expertise. Competency is defined as what a graduating general surgery chief resident or MIS fellow should be able to achieve; proficiency is what a surgeon approximately 3 years out from training should be able to accomplish; and mastery is what more experienced surgeons should be able to accomplish after several years in practice. Mastery is applicable to SAGES surgeons seeking in-depth knowledge in a pathway, including the following: areas of controversy, outcomes, best practice, and ability to mentor colleagues. Over time, with the utilization of coaching and participation in SAGES courses, this level should be obtainable by the majority of SAGES members. This edition of the SAGES Manual – Foregut Surgery – aligns with the current version of the new SAGES University MASTERS Program Foregut Surgery Pathway (Table 1.1).

References

  1. 1.
    Jones DB, Stefanidis D, Korndorffer JR, Dimick JB, Jacob BP, Schultz L, Scott DJ. SAGES University masters program: a structured curriculum for deliberate, lifelong learning. Surg Endosc. 2017;31:3061–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dreyfus SE. The five-stage model of adult skill acquisition. Bull Sci Technol Soc. 2004;24:177–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Graham R, Mancher M, Miller Woman D, Greenfield S, Steinberg E. Institute of Medicine (US) committee on standards for developing trustworthy clinical practice guidelines. Clinical practice guidelines we can trust. Washington, DC: National Academies Press (US); 2011.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, Schünemann HJ, GRADE Working Group. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336:924–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Greenberg CC, Ghousseini HN, Pavuluri Quamme SR, Beasley HL, Wiegmann DA. Surgical coaching for individual performance improvement. Ann Surg. 2015;261:32–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Greenberg CC, Dombrowski J, Dimick JB. Video-based surgical coaching: an emerging approach to performance improvement. JAMA Surg. 2016;151:282–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sachdeva AK. Acquiring skills in new procedures and technology: the challenge and the opportunity. Arch Surg. 2005;140:387–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SAGES 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Harvard Medical School, Division of Bariatric and Minimally Invasive SurgeryBeth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterBostonUSA
  2. 2.Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic SurgeonsBostonUSA
  3. 3.Department of SurgeryIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations