Advertisement

Does Exposure from the Use of Mobile Phones Affect Lateralised Performance and Mood in a Visual Task?

  • Joanna E. N. Fowler
  • Janet M. Noyes
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 818)

Abstract

There has been increasing use of mobile phones and concerns about exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF EMF). The aim of this study was to investigate lateralised effects of exposure on cognitive performance. Forty-eight healthy young males and females performed a dot detection task in three phone conditions, active right, active left and inactive; the completion of a well-being test followed this. Results show that reaction times (RT) are faster when the phones are switched off. In addition, RT is faster for the active phone in the right visual field when it is positioned over the right hemisphere than when the phone is positioned over the right hemisphere and in the left visual field. Also, when the active phone is over the left hemisphere, participants report greater sadness compared to the active phone over the right hemisphere. Previous studies on assymetrical brain function suggest deactivation of the left hemisphere increases negative affect. The combination of the results in the current study suggest a potential mood effect is operating.

Keywords

Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF EMF) Cognitive performance Well-being 

References

  1. 1.
    Pew Research Centre, Mobile Technology Fact Sheet, February 2018. www.pewinternet.org/factsheet/mobile. Accessed 30 May 2018
  2. 2.
    Hardell L, Carlberg M, Soderqvist F, Hansson Mild K (2008) Meta-analsis of long-term mobile phone use and the association with brain tumours. Int J Oncol 32:1097–1103Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sadetaki S, Chetrit A, Jarus-Hakak A et al (2009) Cellular phone use and risk of benign and malignant parotid gland tumors – a nationwide case control study. Am J Epidemiol 164(7):637–643Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Utton T (2017) Radiation from mobiles may lead to brain damage. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-124179/Radiation-mobiles-lead-brain-damage.html. Accessed 16 Nov 2017
  5. 5.
    Zhang J, Sumich A, Wang G (2017) Acute effects of radio frequency electromagnetic fields emitted by mobile phone on brain function. Bioelectromagnetics 38(5):329–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lv B, Chen Z, Wu T, Shao Q, Yan D, Ma L, Lu K, Xie Y (2014) The alteration of spontaneous low frequency oscillations caused by electromagnetic fields exposure. Clin Neurophysiol 125:277–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Goshn R, Yahia-Cherif L, Hugueville L, Ducorps A, Lemarechal J-D, Thuroczy G, de Seze R, Selmaoui B (2015) Radio-frequency signal affects alpha band in resting electroencephalogram. J Neurophysiol 113:2753–2759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Freude G, Ullsperge S, Eggert S, Ruppe I (2000) Microwaves emitted by cellular telephones affect human slow brain potentials. Eur J Appl Physiol 81:18–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jech R, Sonka K, Ruzicka E, Nebuzelsky Bohm J, Juklickova M, Nevsimalova S (2001) Electromagnetic field of mobile phone affects visual event related potential in patients with narcolepsy. Bioelectromagnetics 22(7):519–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rodina A, Lass J, Ripulk J, Bachmann T, Hinrikus H (2005) Study of low level microwave field by method of face masking. Bioelectromagnetics 26:571–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mortazavi SMJ, Rouintan MS, Taeb S, Dehghan N, Ghaffarpanah AA, Sadeghi Z, Ghafouri F (2012) Human short-term exposure to electromagnetic fields emitted by mobile phones decreases computer-assisted visual reaction time. Acta Neurol Belg 112:171–175.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-012-0044-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vecchio F, Buffo P, Sergio S, Iacoviello D, Rossini PM, Bablioni C (2012) Mobile phone emission modulates event related desynchronization of alpha rhythms and cognitive-motor performance in healthy humans. Clin Neurophysiol 12:121–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Croft RJ, Chandler AP, Burgess AP, Barry RJ, Williams JD, Clarke AR (2002) Acute mobile phone operation affects neural function in humans. Clin Neurophysiol 113:1623–1632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ferreri F, Curcio G, Pasqualetti P, Gennaro L, Fini R, Fossini PM (2006) Mobile phone emissions and human excitability. Acta Neurol 60:188–196Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hamblin DL, Wood AW, Croft RJ, Stough C (2004) Examining the effects of electromagnetic fields emitted by GSM mobile phones on human event-related potentials and performance during an auditory task. Clin Neurophysiol 115:171–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Eliyahu I, Luria R, Hareven R, Margaliot M, Nachshon M, Gad S (2006) Effects of radiofrequency radiation emitted by cellular telephones on the cognitive functions of humans. Bioelectromagnetics 27:119–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Luria R, Eliyahu I, Margaliot MH, Meiran N (2009) Cognitive effects of radiation emitted by cellular phones: the influence of exposure side and time. Bioelectromagnetics 30:198–204Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gainotti G (1972) Emotional behaviour and hemispheric side of lesion. Cortex 8:41–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sakeim HA, Greenberg MS, Weiman AL, Gur R, Hungerbuhler JP, Geschwind N (1982) Hemispheric asymmetry in the expression of positive and negative emotions. Arch Neurol 39:210–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Robinson RG, Kubos KL, Starr LB, Rao K, Price TR (1984) Mood disorders in stroke patients: importance of location of lesion. Brain 107:81–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Harmon-Jones E, Gable PA, Peterson CK (2010) The role of asymmetric frontal cortical activity in emotion-related phenomena: a review and update. Biol Psychol 84:451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kolb B, Taylor L (1991) Affective behaviour in patients with localised cortical excisions: role of lesion site and side. Science 214:89–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bennett K, Magee K, Pleydell-Pearce C (2017) Bristol well being group, state well being scale, work in progressGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Davidoff JB (1982) Studies with non-verbal stimuli. In: Beaumont JG (ed) Divided visual field studies of cerebral organisation. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Young AW, Ratcliffe G (1982) Visuospatial abilities of the right hemisphere. In: Young AW (ed) Functions of the right cerebral hemisphere. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rhodes G (1985) Lateralised processes in face recognition. Br J Psychol 76:249–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hyland GJ (2000) Physics and biology of mobile telephony. Lancet 356:1833–1836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    George MS, Ketter TA, Parekh PI, Howitz B, Herscovitch P, Post RM (1995) Brain activity during transient sadness and happiness in healthy women. Am J Psychiatry 152:341–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Canli T, Desmond JE, Zhao Z, Glover G, Gabrieli JDE (1998) Hemispheric asymmetry for emotional stimuli detected with fMRI. Neuroreport 9(14):3233–3239Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Experimental PsychologyUniversity of BristolBristolUK

Personalised recommendations