Advertisement

An Ergonomic Grip Design Process for Vaginal Ultra Sound Probe Based on Analyses of Benchmarking, Hand Data, and Grip Posture

  • Hayoung Jung
  • Nahyun Lee
  • Soojin Moon
  • Xiaopeng Yang
  • Seungju Lee
  • Junpil Moon
  • Kilsu Ha
  • Jinho Lim
  • Heecheon You
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 818)

Abstract

The present study presents a systematic design process for the ergonomic design of a vaginal probe based on benchmarking, hand data, and grip posture analyses. Five existing vaginal grip designs were compared with each other using subjective measures to identify preferred design features for a new probe grip design. An in-depth analysis of the relationships between grip design variables and hand dimensions was conducted along with the consideration of preferred grip postures of vaginal probe and hand measurements. Two novel vaginal probe grip designs were proposed based on the analysis results of benchmarking, hand data, and grip posture. A validation experiment showed a significant improvement of the hand-data based vaginal grip design compared with the existing designs in terms of subjective satisfaction and wrist flexion.

Keywords

Ergonomic grip design Grip design process Ultra sound probe 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The present research was jointly supported by Samsung Medison Corporation, Mid-Career Research Programs through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (NRF-2018R1A2A2A05023299), and the Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy (No. 10063384; R0004840, 2017).

References

  1. 1.
    Bernard BP, Putz-Anderson V, Burt SE, Cole LL, Fairfield-Estill C, Fine LJ, Grant KA, Gjessing C, Jenkins L, Hurrell JJ, Nelson N, Pfirman D, Roberts R, Stetson D, Haring Sweeney M, Tanaka S (1997) Musculoskeletal disorders and workplace factor: a critical review of epidemiologic evidence for work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the neck, upper extremity, and low back. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), U.S. Department of Health and Human Service, CincinnatiGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bohlemann J, Kluth K, Kotzbauer K, Strasser H (1994) Ergonomic assessment of handle design by means of electromyography and subjective rating. Appl Ergon 25(6):346–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Burnett DR, Campbell-Kyureghyan NH (2010) Quantification of scan-specific ergonomic risk-factors in medical sonography. Int J Ind Ergon 40:306–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Evans K, Roll S, Baker J (2009) Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WRMSD) among registered diagnostic medical sonographers and vascular technologists. J Diagn Med Sonogr 25(6):287–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gordon C, Churchill T, Clauser CE, Bradtmiller B, McConville JT, Tebetts I, Walker RA (1988) Anthropometric Survey of U.S. Army Personnel: method and summary statistics. U.S. Army NATICK Research, Development and Engineering Center, NatickGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Harih G, Dolsak B (2014) Comparison of subjective comfort ratings between anatomically shaped and cylindrical handles. Appl Ergon 45:943–954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jeon E, Lee B, Kim H, Park S, You H (2011) An ergonomic design of flight suit pattern according to wearing characteristics. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society 55th annual meeting, Las Vegas, NV, USAGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Korean Agency for Technology and Standard (KATS) (2004) Report on the 6th Size-Korea (Korean Body Measurement and Investigation). Ministry of Knowledge Economy, Republic of KoreaGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lee W, Jung K, You H (2008) Development and application of a grip design method using hand anthropometric data. In: Proceedings of the 2008 spring joint conference of the Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers & the Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society, Gumi, South KoreaGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lee W, Jeong J, Park J, Jeon E, Kim H, Jung D, Park S, You H (2015) Analysis of the facial measurements of Korean Air Force pilots for oxygen mask design. Ergonomics 56(9):1451–1464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mazzola M, Forzoni L, D’Onofrio S, Andreoni G (2016) Use of digital human model for ultrasound system design: a case study to minimize the risk of musculoskeletal disorders. Int J Ind Ergon 60:35–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Paschoarelli LC, Oliveira AB, Coury HJCG (2008) Assessment of the ergonomic design of diagnostic ultrasound transducers through wrist movements and subjective evaluation. Int J Ind Ergon 38:999–1006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vannetti F, Atzori T, Matteoli S, Hartmann K, Altobelli G, Molino-Lova R, Forzoni L (2015) Usability characteristics assessment protocol applied to eTouch ultrasound user-defined workflow optimization tool. Proc Manuf 3:104–111Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Village J, Trask C (2007) Ergonomic analysis of postural and muscular loads to diagnostic sonographers. Int J Ind Ergon 37:781–789CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Industrial and Management EngineeringPohang University of Science and TechnologyPohangSouth Korea
  2. 2.Design GroupSamsung Medison Co.SeoulSouth Korea
  3. 3.Design Group, Health & Medical Equipment Business DivisionSamsung Electronics Co.SeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations