Advertisement

Tailored Patient Experiences

A Research Through Design Study
  • Bob Groeneveld
  • Marijke Melles
  • Stephan Vehmeijer
  • Nina Mathijssen
  • Lisanne van Dijk
  • Richard Goossens
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 818)

Abstract

To achieve optimal patient-centered care for people undergoing a Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA), communication should ideally be tailored. In previous studies, three clusters of patients or patient ‘roles’ were identified based on communication preferences and clinical and psychological characteristics as a starting point for tailored communication in orthopedics. The current study aims to formulate initial guidelines for the design of tailored communication and information provision based on these roles. Two design cases were each evaluated as storyboards with twelve patients (three, seven, and two patients of each role, respectively). Generic and functionality-specific preferences were indicated by participants for both design proposals. Similarities in feedback per role provided the basis for generating an initial set of role-specific guidelines, that can be used to design tailored information and communication solutions.

Keywords

Communication design Healthcare Patient experience 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) and Zimmer Biomet Inc [grant number 314-99-118].

References

  1. 1.
    Zwijnenberg NC, Damman OC, Spreeuwenberg P et al (2011) Different patient subgroup, different ranking? Which quality indicators do patients find important when choosing a hospital for hip- or knee arthroplasty? BMC Health Serv Res 11:299.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    De Boer D, Delnoij D, Rademakers J (2010) Do patient experiences on priority aspects of health care predict their global rating of quality of care? A study in five patient groups. Heal Expect 13:285–297.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00591.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Buckle P, Clarkson PJ, Coleman R et al (2006) Patient safety, systems design and ergonomics. Appl Ergon 37:491–500.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2006.04.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goodwin C (2016) Person-centered care: a definition and essential elements. J Am Geriatr Soc 64:15–18.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.13866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Randström KB, Asplund K, Svedlund M (2013) “I have to be patient”-a longitudinal case study of an older man’s rehabilitation experience after hip replacement surgery. J Nurs Educ Pract 3:160–169Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cott CA (2004) Client-centered rehabilitation: client perspectives. Disabil Rehabil 26:1411–1422.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280400000237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dekkers T, Melles M, Mathijssen NMC, de Ridder H (n.d.) Connecting preferences to satisfaction: three profiles of total joint replacement surgery patientsGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Groeneveld BS, Melles M, Mathijssen NMC et al (n.d.) Exploring patient experiences in Total Lower Joint Arthroplasty through generative researchGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Visser FS, Stappers PJ, van der Lugt R, Sanders EB-N (2005) Contextmapping: experiences from practice. CoDesign 1:119–149.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880500135987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wolf JA, Niederhauser V, Marshburn D, Lavela SL (2014) Defining patient experience. Patient Exp J 1:7–19Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stappers P, Giaccardi E (2017) Research through design. In: Soegaard M, Dam R (eds) The encyclopedia of human-computer interaction, 2nd edn. Interaction Design Foundation, AarhusGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Roozenburg NFM, Eekels J (1998) Productontwerpen: Structuur en methoden [Product Design: Fundamentals and methods], 2nd edn. Lemma, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wiklund ME, Kendler J, Strochlic AY (2011) Usability testing of medical devices, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Industrial Design EngineeringDelft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Orthopaedics GroupReinier de Graaf HospitalDelftThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations