Skip to main content

The Influence of Information Acquisition Strategies on Foot Proprioception and Obstacle Avoidance Pattern in People with Low Vision

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018) (IEA 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 819))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to understand the influence of various information acquisition strategies on foot proprioception and obstacle avoidance in people with low vision. Ten adult males (41.0 ± 7.1 years) with pigmentary retinal degeneration were recruited for this study. Participants acquired obstacle information (obstacle height: 4 cm and 15 cm) through three different strategies, namely, front (A), downward (B), and tactile (C). Subsequently, the participants performed two different tasks; Task 1: After identification of the obstacles, the participants reproduced the obstacle height by lifting their foot while standing still (10 times). Task 2: Following the acquisition of the obstacle information through conditions B and C, participants performed obstacle step-over from a standing position. In task 1, condition B showed significantly higher toe-rise and coefficient of variance in toe-rise (p < 0.05) than in conditions A and C, which both displayed similar toe-rise. Likewise, in task 2, the highest points of the leading and trailing feet while stepping over the obstacle were significantly higher (p < 0.05) in condition B than in condition C. Additionally, the coefficient of effort in condition B was significantly larger (p < 0.05) than that of condition C. These results suggest that differences in information acquisition strategies have an impact on the foot trajectory during obstacle step-over. Out of the three methods used in this study, information acquisition through the tactile sense may be the best obstacle avoidance feedback method for people with low vision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Masaki T, Motohiro O (1995) A present situation and problems of independent travel of blind and visual impaired. Soc Instrum Control Eng 34(2):140–146. https://doi.org/10.11499/sicejl1962.34.140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cardin S, Thalmann D, Vexo F (2007) A wearable system for mobility improvement of visually impaired people. Vis Comput 23(2):109–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization. http://www.nedo.go.jp/activities/ZZ_00446.html. Accessed 23 Apr 2018

  4. Zijlstra GR, Ballemans J, Kempen GI (2013) Orientation and mobility training for adults with low vision: a new standardized approach. Clin Rehabil 27(1):3–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215512445395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cappagli G, Finocchietti S, Baud-Bovy G, Cocchi E, Gori M (2017) Multisensory rehabilitation training improves spatial perception in totally but not partially visually deprived children. Front Integr Neurosci 11:1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2017.00029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ishmael D (2015) The use of auditory, tactual, olfactory and kinaesthetic senses in developing orientation and mobility (O & M) skills to learners with congenital blindness (CB). IOSR J Humanit Soc Sci 20(2):34–44. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-20213444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Newell FN (2004) Cross-modal object recognition. In: Galvert G, Spence C, Stein BE (eds) The hand-book of multisensory processes. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 123–139

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wada Y (2007) Vision influences on tactile discrimination of grating orientation. Jpn J Psychol 78(3):297–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ernst MO, Bülthoff HH (2004) Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends Cogn Sci 8(4):162–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work is supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers 15K16413.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tadashi Uno .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Uno, T., Loh, P.Y., Muraki, S. (2019). The Influence of Information Acquisition Strategies on Foot Proprioception and Obstacle Avoidance Pattern in People with Low Vision. In: Bagnara, S., Tartaglia, R., Albolino, S., Alexander, T., Fujita, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018). IEA 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 819. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96089-0_86

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics