A Conceptual Framework of Collective Activity in Constructive Ergonomics

  • Sandrine CarolyEmail author
  • Flore Barcellini
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 822)


The aim of this presentation is to present a constructive view of the development of collective activity. The concept of collective activity is a proposal of Caroly [1] aiming to connect cooperative work of operators with work collective – collectif de travail in French - that they belong to. These tow concepts are described to understand the organizational conditions to support the development of collective activity: recognition of skills, arenas for debate of criteria for quality of work, reelaboration of rules, intermediaries objects, technical systems, projects design, reorganization with managers.


Collective activity Collective work Constructive ergonomics 


  1. 1.
    Caroly S (2010) Activité collective et réélaboration des règles: des enjeux pour la santé au travail. Document d’habilitation à diriger des recherches en ergonomie, Université de Bordeaux 2.
  2. 2.
    Engeström Y, Miettinen R, Punamäki RL (1999) Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Daniellou F, Rabardel P (2006) Activity-oriented approaches to ergonomics: some traditions and communauties. Theor Issues Ergon Sci 6(5):355–357Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clot Y (2008) Travail et pouvoir d’agir. PUF, ParisGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    de la Garza C, Weill-Fassina A (2000) Régulations horizontales et verticales du risque. In: Weill-Fassina A, Hakim Benchekroun T (eds) Le travail collectif: perspectives actuelles en ergonomie. Octarès Editions, Toulouse, pp 217–234Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Caroly S, Weill-Fassina A (2007) How do different approaches to collective activity in service relations call into question the plurality of ergonomic activity models? Activités 4(1):99–111.
  7. 7.
    Darses F, Détienne F, Falzon P, Visser W (2001) COMET: a method for analysing collective design process. INRIA Publications, Rocquencourt.
  8. 8.
    Salembier P, Zouinar M (2004) Mutual intelligibility and shared context. Conceptual inspirations and technological reductions. Activités 1(2):64–85Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schmidt K (2002) The problem with ‘awareness’: introductory remarks on ‘awareness in CSCW’. J Comput Support Coop Work 11(3–4):285–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Heath C, Svensson MS, Hindmarsh J, Luff P, Von Lehn D (2002) Configuring awareness. JCSCW 11(1–2):317–347Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Leplat J (1991) Organization of activity in collective tasks. In: Rasmussen J, Brehmer B, Leplat J (eds) Distributed decision making. Wiley, Chischester, pp 61–74Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hoc JM, Carlier X (2002) Role of common frame of reference in cognitive cooperation: sharing tasks between agents in Air Traffic Control. Cogn Technol Work 4(1):37–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Carroll JM, Rosson MB, Convertino G, Ganoe CH (2006) Awareness and teamwork in computer-supported collaborations. Interact Comput 18:21–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Caroly S (2011) Collective activity and reelaboration of rules as resources for mental health: the case of police officers. Le Travail Humain 74(4):365–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lemonie Y, Chassaing K (2015) From the adaptation of movement to the development of gesture. In: Falzon P (ed) Constructive ergonomics. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 49–64Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Caroly S (2009) Designing collective activity: a way to workers’ health. In: Proceedings of the IEA 2009. Congress IEA, Beijing, 10–14 August 2009Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Caroly S, Flore F (2015) The development of collective activity. In: Falzon P (ed) Constructive ergonomics. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 19–32Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Barcellini F, Van Belleghem L, Daniellou F (2015) Design projects as opportunities for the development of activities. In: Falzon P (ed) Constructive ergonomics. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 171–204Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Barcellini F, Détienne F, Burkhardt JM (2010) Distributed design and distributed social awareness: exploring inter-subjective dimensions of roles. In: Lewkowicz M, Hassanaly P, Rodhe M, Wulf V (eds) Proceedings of the COOP 2010 conference. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Petit J, Coutarel F (2015) Intervention as dynamic processes for the joint development of agents and organization. In: Falzon P (ed) Constructive ergonomics. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 171–204Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Falzon P (2005) Ergonomics, knowledge development and the design of enabling environments. In: Presented at humanizing work and work environment conference (HWWE 2005), Guwahati, IndeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.PACTE Laboratory, Grenoble Alps University, IEPGrenoble Cedex 09France
  2. 2.Le Cnam CRTDParisFrance

Personalised recommendations