Advertisement

Text Input in Hospital Settings Using IoT Device Ensembles

  • Jasmin Wollgast
  • Andreas Schrader
  • Tilo Mentler
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 822)

Abstract

Care processes in hospitals require intensive communication between stakeholders, interaction with technology and documentation of processes. In any of these cases, text plays a central role. Variable and adaptive text input methods can enhance workflows approaching quality, time, hygiene and resource management. Touchless technologies and speech input offer promising new input methods. Especially, the Internet of Things (IoT) offers plenty of opportunities for the separation of input and output interaction devices, and the adaptive and context-aware provision of wirelessly connected compositions of smart devices (IoT-ensembles) fulfilling the specific needs of all relevant stakeholders of the care process.

This paper analyzes empirically the requirements and possible integrations for text input device ensembles within hospitals using the process of Human-Centered Design (ISO 9241-210). The results were used as the methodical base to design a concept, to build an appropriate prototype, and to evaluate usability according to ISO 9241-11. The participants of the evaluation confirmed an improvement of efficiency or effectiveness for dedicated situations by using the provided devices.

Keywords

Internet of Things (IoT) Text input devices Clinical care 

References

  1. 1.
    Nguyen HP, Ayachi F, Lavigne-Pelletier C, Blamoutier M, Rahimi F, Boissy P, Jog M, Duval C (2015) Auto detection and segmentation of physical activities during a Timed-Up-and-Go (TUG) task in healthy older adults using multiple inertial sensors. J NeuroEng Rehabil 12(1):36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pinske D, Weyers B, Luther W, Stevens T (2013) Personalassistenz im Krankenhaus durch intelligente und ambiente Pflegedokumentation. Kognitive Systeme (1), University of Duisburg-EsseGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Altakouri B, Kortuem G, Grünerbl A, Lukowicz P (2010) The benefit of activity recognition for mobile phone based nursing documentation: wizard-of-oz study. In: 14th annual IEEE international symposium on wearable computers (ISWC), Seoul, pp 1–4Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Altakrouri B, Schrader A (2012) Towards dynamic natural interaction ensembles. In: Ramduny-Ellis D, Dix A, Gill S (eds) Proceedings of the fourth workshop on physicality. Birmingham University, BirminghamGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wollgast J (2017) IoT-Ensembles für Texteingabe im klinischen Kontext. Bachelor Thesis, University of Lübeck (in German)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fabbri D, Ehrenfeld JM (2016) Hands free automatic clinical care documentation: opportunities for motion sensors and cameras. J Med Syst 40(10):213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Burmeister D, Schrader A (2018) Runtime generation and delivery of guidance for smart object ensembles. In: 9th international conference on applied human factors and ergonomics (AHFE), OrlandoGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Max Plank Gesellschaft Homepage. https://www.mpg.de/9664205/beruehrungslos-touchless-bildschirm. Last Accessed 28 May 2018

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jasmin Wollgast
    • 1
  • Andreas Schrader
    • 1
  • Tilo Mentler
    • 1
  1. 1.University of LuebeckLübeckGermany

Personalised recommendations