Advertisement

Interaction Options for Wearables and Smart-Devices While Walking

  • Jessica Conradi
  • Martin Westhoven
  • Thomas Alexander
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 822)

Abstract

Using smartphones and wearables in parallel activities, e.g. while walking, is a widespread phenomenon. In different individuals we furthermore find different interaction styles which involve one or both hands. To study the effects of different interaction styles, we carried out a study involving three different interaction styles for touch-sensitive devices compared to a HMD operated by an additional controller providing passive haptic feedback. The experimental task was carried out while walking on a treadmill. In addition to the primary task of using the interaction device, a secondary task was administered which competed for the participants’ visual attention.

We found an impact of the different interaction styles on the input performance: Time on task proved to be faster with the HMD combined with a haptic input device, but error count increased significantly as well. Using the thumb for input resulted in a longer overall time during which the visual attention was focused on the interaction device.

Keywords

Mobile interaction Walking Interaction styles 

References

  1. 1.
    Gold JE, Driban JB, Thomas N, Chakravarty T, Channell V, Komaroff E (2012) Postures, typing strategies, and gender differences in mobile device usage: an observational study. Appl Ergon.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2011.06.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Trudeau MB, Asakawa DS, Jindrich DL, Dennerlein JT (2016) Two-handed grip on a mobile phone affords greater thumb motor performance, decreased variability, and a more extended thumb posture than a one-handed grip. Appl Ergon.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2015.06.025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Park YS, Han SH, Park J, Cho Y (2008) Touch key design for target selection on a mobile phone. In: ter Hofte H, Mulder I (eds) Proceedings of the 10th conference on human–computer interaction with mobile devices and services, Mobile HCI 2008, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, p 423.  https://doi.org/10.1145/1409240.1409304
  4. 4.
    Parhi P, Karlson AK, Bederson BB (2006) Target size study for one-handed thumb use on small touchscreen devices. In: Nieminen M, Röykkee M (eds) Proceedings of the 8th conference on human–computer interaction with mobile devices and services. MobileHCI ‘06, Helsinki, Finland, 12–15 September 2006, p 203.  https://doi.org/10.1145/1152215.1152260
  5. 5.
    Ng A, Brewster SA, Williamson JH (2014) Investigating the effects of encumbrance on one- and two-handed interactions with mobile devices. In: Jones M, Palanque P, Schmidt A, Grossman T (eds) Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI’14, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, pp 1981–1990.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557312
  6. 6.
    Conradi J, Busch O, Alexander T (2015) Optimal touch buttons size for the use of mobile devices while walking. Procedia Manuf.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lin M, Goldman R, Price KJ, Sears A, Jacko J (2007) How do people tap when walking? An empirical investigation of nomadic data entry. Int J Hum Comput Stud.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2007.04.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hillman EJ, Bloomberg JJ, McDonald PV, Cohen HS (1999) Dynamic visual acuity while walking in normals and labyrinthine-deficient patients. J Vestib Res 9(1):49–57Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pozzo T, Berthoz A, Lefort L (1990) Head stabilization during various locomotor tasks in humans. Exp Brain Res.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00230842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Conradi J, Alexander T (2014) Analysis of visual performance during the use of mobile devices while walking. In: Hutchison D, Kanade T, Kittler J, Kleinberg JM, Kobsa A, Mattern F, Mitchell JC, Naor M, Nierstrasz O, Pandu Rangan C, Steffen B, Terzopoulos D, Tygar D, Weikum G, Harris D (eds) Engineering psychology and cognitive ergonomics, vol 8532. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Cham, pp 133–142Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kuchenbecker J, Stilling J, Broschmann D, Hertel E, Velhagen K, Kuchenbecker J (2014) Plates for color vision testing. Georg Thieme Verlag, StuttgartGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jessica Conradi
    • 1
  • Martin Westhoven
    • 2
  • Thomas Alexander
    • 1
  1. 1.Fraunhofer FKIEWachtbergGermany
  2. 2.German Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and HealthDortmundGermany

Personalised recommendations