Repetitive manual lifting and lowering tasks exposes workers to a high-risk musculoskeletal disorder. This paper aims at the assessment of postures of workers during the piling up process of a Concrete Block and Bricks (CB&B) at CB&B manufacturing factories in Pakistan and to study the effect of different risk factors such as contact force, stresses, and repetition of jobs that put muscles under redundant physical forces, which causes musculoskeletal disorders. The lifting indices (LI) of concrete blocks are 1.57 at the origin and 2.04 at the destination similarly LI for the bricks were 0.60 at the origin and 0.77 at the destination using the NOISH equation. For this purpose, the anthropometric data of 103 workers, working in 33 different factories, was collected. The postures were simulated and analyzed, using a human modelling solution HumanCAD software, with an objective to minimize the risk of work-related injuries, and stresses on the different parts of body was calculated. The results showed in current work environment, 38.83% of workers have lower back musculoskeletal disorder, followed by 31.06% with upper back, 29.12% with thorax and 24.27% with neck. Therefore, re-design the lifting methods of CB&B factories are essential in order to reduce the work-related injuries. The reports were shared with the CB&B industries.
Musculoskeletal disorders Lifting task Lower back pain Muscle stresses Digital human modelling
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
The authors are grateful to all Brick and Concrete Block industries administrations and workers who participated in this study. The Author(s) also like to thank Board of Studies and Advanced Research (BOSAR), University of Engineering and Technology, Peshawar for the research funding.
Choobineh A et al (2007) Musculoskeletal problems in Iranian hand-woven carpet industry: Guidelines for workstation design. Appl Ergon 38(5):617–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keyserling WM (2000) Workplace risk factors and occupational musculoskeletal disorders, Part 2: a review of biomechanical and psychophysical research on risk factors associated with upper extremity disorders. AIHAJ-Am Ind Hyg Assoc 61(2):231–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takala E-P et al (2010) Systematic evaluation of observational methods assessing biomechanical exposures at work. Scand J Work Environ Health 3–24Google Scholar
Stock SR (1991) Workplace ergonomic factors and the development of musculoskeletal disorders of the neck and upper limbs: a meta-analysis. Am J Ind Med 19(1):87–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavlović-Veselinović S Repetition as a risk factor for the development of musculoskeletal disordersGoogle Scholar
Loisel P et al (2005) Prevention of work disability due to musculoskeletal disorders: the challenge of implementing evidence. J Occup Rehabil 15(4):507–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dall TM et al (2013) Modeling the indirect economic implications of musculoskeletal disorders and treatment. Cost Eff Resource Alloc 11(1):5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dul J, Neumann WP (2009) Ergonomics contributions to company strategies. Appl Ergon 40(4):745–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rost K, Smith JL, Dickinson M (2004) The effect of improving primary care depression management on employee absenteeism and productivity a randomized trial. Med Care 42(12):1202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braakman-Jansen LM et al (2011) Productivity loss due to absenteeism and presenteeism by different instruments in patients with RA and subjects without RA. Rheumatology 51(2):354–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johns G (2011) Attendance dynamics at work: the antecedents and correlates of presenteeism, absenteeism, and productivity loss. J Occup Health Psychol 16(4):483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David G (2005) Ergonomic methods for assessing exposure to risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Occup Med 55(3):190–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaub KG et al (2012) Ergonomic assessment of automotive assembly tasks with digital human modelling and the ‘ergonomics assessment worksheet’(EAWS). Int J Hum Factors Model Simul 3(3–4):398–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ding Z (2013) Manual assembly modelling and simulation for ergonomics analysis. CiteseerGoogle Scholar
Chang SW, Wang MJJ (2007) Digital human modeling and workplace evaluation: using an automobile assembly task as an example. Hum Factors Ergon Manuf Serv Ind 17(5):445–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy VG (2008) Handbook of digital human modeling: research for applied ergonomics and human factors engineering. CRC Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaffin DB (2008) Digital human modeling for workspace design. Rev Hum Factors Ergon 4(1):41–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colombo G, Regazzoni D, Rizzi C (2013) Ergonomic design through virtual Humans. Comput Aided Des Appl 10(5):745–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Álvarez-Casado E et al (2016) Using ergonomic digital human modeling in evaluation of workplace design and prevention of work-related musculoskeletal disorders aboard small fishing vessels. Hum Factors Ergon Manuf Serv Ind 26(4):463–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lämkull D, Hanson L, Örtengren R (2009) A comparative study of digital human modelling simulation results and their outcomes in reality: a case study within manual assembly of automobiles. Int J Ind Ergon 39(2):428–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar