Advertisement

Creativity in Uncovering Customer Expertise for Affective Design

  • Jouh Ching Goh
  • Martin G. Helander
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 824)

Abstract

We analyzed customer expertise in purchasing a car that satisfies customer needs for affective design. The approach was based on a hierarchical patterns analysis. There is a hierarchy of requirements starting with simple marketing requirements and ending with final design details. We assume that there is a rationale for customer’s evaluation of cars, and that evaluations are connected to design details. The purpose of using a hierarchical pattern was to model how car buyers evaluate car appearance. In addition, a hierarchical pattern is helpful to establish a dialog between car buyers and designers and create a frame work, where customer requirements can be satisfied. The study examined five main roles of product appearance, namely: Aesthetics, Symbolic Meaning, Functionality, Ergonomics and Categorization. The functional and ergonomics role are described as semantic roles as they address user’s evaluation of the apparent utility and perceived quality of a design. Twenty-six sets of evaluations were obtained from interviews with 13 subjects. To arrive at hierarchical patterns, the data was analyzed in three steps: Step 1 involved classifying responses into three groups: “I like”, “I dislike” and “I want to modify”. Step 2 transformed the results into hierarchical patterns using questions such as “Why do you like this car?” Step 3 analyzed and generalized the hierarchical patterns into a few simple patterns. The analyses yielded seven different hierarchical patterns, which generally fit all the evaluations of cars. The results are discussed in the context of the product appearance roles.

Keywords

Customer expertise Hierarchical patterns Affective design 

References

  1. 1.
    Helander M, Khalid H (2012) Chapter 21. Affective engineering and design. In: Salvendy G (ed) Handbook on human factors and ergonomics, 4th edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Khalid H, Opperud A, Radha J, Xu Q, Helander M (2012) Elicitation and analysis of affective needs in vehicle design. Theor Issues Ergon Sci 13:318–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Black CD, Baker MJ (1987) Success through design. Des Stud 8(4):207–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gemser G, Leenders M (2001) How integrating industrial design in the product development process impacts on company performance. J Prod Innov Manag 18(1):28–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berkowitz M (1987) Product shape as a design innovation strategy. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1540–5885.440274
  6. 6.
    Dawar N, Parker P (1994) Marketing universals: consumers’ use of brand name, price, physical appearance, and retailer reputation as signals of product quality. J Mark 58:81–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bloch PH (1995) Seeking the ideal form: product design and consumer response. J Mark 59(3):16–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bitner MJ (1992) Servicescapes: the impact of physical surroundings on customers and employees. J Mark 56:57–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Solomon MR (1983) The role of products as social stimuli: a symbolic interactionism perspective. J Consum Res 10(December):319–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ellis WD (1950) A source book of gestalt psychology. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Berlyn DE (1980) Psychological aesthetics. In: Triandis HC (ed) Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, vol 3. Allyn & Bacon, BostonGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jones P (1991) Taste today. Pergamon Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Meyers-Levy J, Tybout AM (1989) Schema congruity as a basis for product evaluation. J Consum Res 16:39–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    O’Shaughnessy E (1992) Enclaves and excursions. Int J Psycho-Anal 73:603–611Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Krippendorff K (1989) On the essential contexts of artifacts or on the proposition that design is making sense (of things). Des Issues 5(2):9–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Holbrook MB (1980) Some preliminary notes on research in consumer esthetics. In: Olson JC (ed) Advances in consumer research, vol 7. Association for Consumer Research, Ann Arbor, pp 104–108Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Creusen MEH, Schoormans JPL (2005) The different roles of product appearance in consumer choice. J Prod Innov Manag 22(1):63–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dittmar H (1992) The social psychology of material possessions: to have is to be. St Martin’s Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schmitt B, Simonson A (1997) Marketing aesthetics: the strategic management of brands, identity, and image. The Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Muller W (2001) Order and meaning in design. Lemma Publishers, UtrechtGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ashby M, Johnson K (2002) Materials and design. Butterworth, Heinemann, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Veryzer RW Jr (1995) The place of product design and aesthetics in consumer research. In: Kardes FR, Mita Sujan M (eds) NA - advances in consumer research, vol 22. Provo, Association for Consumer Research, pp 641–645Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Srinivasan SS, Anderson R, Ponnavolu K (2002) Customer loyalty in e-commerce: an exploration of its antecedents and consequences. J Retail 27:279–295Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hoyer WD (1984) An examination of consumer decision making for a common repeat purchase product. J Consum Res 11(3):822–829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Olshavsky RW, Spreng RA (1996) An exploratory study of the innovation evaluation process. J Prod Innov Manag 13(6):512–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.Damai SciencesKuala LumpurMalaysia

Personalised recommendations