Advertisement

Iteration in Usabilty Testing: Instructive Interfaces of a Dietary Plan in Diabetics

  • Carlos D. de Leon Zuloaga
  • Lilia Roselia Prado Leon
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 824)

Abstract

The goal of usability testing is to make design decisions based on objective data and user-centered criteria. Iteration in usability testing is key to identify the design decisions that hinder the interaction between users and interfaces, additionally validates the design elements that enhance it. When the usability testing is applied to systems or interfaces related to users’ health issues, such as diabetes, benefits in both in the interaction as well in user welfare are obtained. Diabetes complications can be diminished through the metabolic control of the patient, which is achieved through the implementation of a dietary plan. Two usability assessments were carried out during the interface development, this study presents the second iteration of the assessment of the interface redesign based on the results of the first evaluation, the feedback from the participants and the application of the ergonomic guidelines. Three dimensions of usability were evaluated: satisfaction, efficiency and effectiveness. Both interfaces showed similar results in usability. The use of color was identified as a design element to be assessed in an isolated manner. The iterative assessment allowed to improve the proposed guidelines for the design of instructional interfaces and when applied in the interface design process, results in a positive effect on its usability. In addition, the recommendations made by the users of the first test were validated through the iterative testing, making this a user centered process.

Keywords

Usability testing Instructional interface Diabetics 

References

  1. 1.
    Nielsen J (1994) Usability engineering. Elsevier, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    International Organization for Standardization (2018) Ergonomics of human-system interaction — Part 11: usability: definitions and concepts (ISO Standard No. 9241-11)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nielsen J, Loranger H (2006) Prioritizing web usability. Pearson Education, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Krug S (2005) Don’t make me think: a common sense approach to web usability. Pearson Education India, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brooke RE, Isherwood S, Herbert NC, Raynor DK, Knapp P (2012) Hearing aid instruction booklets: employing usability testing to determine effectiveness. Am J Audiol 21(2):206–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Leventhal L, Barnes J (2007) Usability Engineering: process, products and examples. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cañas JJ, Waerns Y (2001) Ergonomía cognitiva: aspectos psicológicos de la interacción de las personas con la tecnología de la información. Ed. Medica PanamericanaGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Adams A (2003) Usability testing in information design. In: Zwaga H, Boersema T, Hoonhout H (eds) Visual information for everyday use: design and research perspectives. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 3–20Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Atlas MA (1981) The user edit: making manuals easier to use. IEEE Trans Prof Commun 1:28–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    ISO 9126-1:2001 (2001) Software engineering – product quality – Part 1: quality modelGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wright P (2003) Printed instructions: can research make the difference? In: Zwaga H, Boersema T, Hoonhout H (eds) Visual information for everyday use: design and research perspectives. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 45–66Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bolaños R et al (2010) Costos directos de atención médica en pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo 2 en México: análisis de microcosteo. Rev Panam Salud Publica 28(6):412–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gutiérrez JP, Rivera-Dommarco J, Shamah-Levy T, Villalpando-Hernández S, Franco A, Cuevas-Nasu L, Romero-Martínez M, Hernández-Avila M (2012) Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutricion 2012. Resultados Nacionales. Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, CuernavacaGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lim MY, Girolami D, Infantino CG, Onzari M (2010) Lo escencial en metabolismo y nutrición. Elsevier EspañaGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kumar V, Fausto N, Abbas AK, Cotran RS, Robbins SL (2005) Robbins and Cotran pathologic basis of disease, 7.° edición. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 1194–1195Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nahan LK, Escott-Stump S, González Hernández JL (2001) Nutrición y dietoterapia de, KrauseGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sámano Orozco LF (2011) Abandono del tratamiento dietético en pacientes diagnosticados con obesidad en un consultorio privado de nutrición. Nutrición Clínica y Dietética Hospitalaria 31(1):15–19Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Robinson PA (2009) Writing and designing manuals and warnings 4e. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    de León Zuloaga CD, León LRP (2017) Comparison between color and greyscale interfaces: recipe usability for a dietary plan in diabetics. In: International conference on applied human factors and ergonomics, July 2017. Springer, Cham, pp 111–121Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ganier F (2004) Factors affecting the processing of procedural instructions: implications for document design. IEEE Trans Prof Commun 47(1):15–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    El Ahmad AS, Yan J, Ng WY (2012) CAPTCHA design: color, usability, and security. IEEE Internet Comput 16(2):44–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Huang H, Lai HH (2008) Factors influencing the usability of icons in the LCD touchscreen. Displays 29(4):339–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lewis JR (1995) IBM computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: psychometric evaluation and instructions for use. Int J Hum Comput Interact 7(1):57–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bonnardel N, Piolat A, Le Bigot L (2011) The impact of colour on Website appeal and users’ cognitive processes. Displays 32(2):69–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Brown LB, Oler CHK (2000) A food display assignment and handling food models improves accuracy of college students’ estimates of food portions. J Am Dietetic Assoc 100(9):1063–1065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Riley WT, Beasley J, Sowell A, Behar A (2007) Effects of a Web-based food portion training program on food portion estimation. J Nutr Educ Behav 39(2):70–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Turconi G, Guarcello M, Berzolari FG, Carolei A, Bazzano R, Roggi C (2005) An evaluation of a colour food photography atlas as a tool for quantifying food portion size in epidemiological dietary surveys. Eur J Clin Nutr 59(8):923–931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Evans AW et al (2002) Is a picture worth a thousand words? Investigating structural knowledge with textual and pictorial stimuli. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, vol 46, no 3. SAGE PublicationsGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Young SL, Wogalter MS (1990) Comprehension and memory of instruction manual warnings: Conspicuous print and pictorial icons. Hum Fact J Hum Fact Ergon Soc 32(6):637–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Olson JM, Brewer CA (1997) An evaluation of color selections to accommodate map users with color-vision impairments. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 87(1):103–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carlos D. de Leon Zuloaga
    • 1
  • Lilia Roselia Prado Leon
    • 1
  1. 1.Centro Universitario de Arte, Arquitectura y DiseñoUniversidad de GuadalajaraJaliscoMexico

Personalised recommendations