Advertisement

Temporal Dispersion in Distributed Work

  • Béatrice Linot
  • Jérôme Dinet
  • François Charoy
  • Valerie L. Shalin
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 824)

Abstract

Effective communication is critical to sociotechnical systems. Such systems may entail distributed authority and responsibility, and physical resources that are not collocated. This is certainly the case in crisis management. To improve communication during crisis management, researchers have tried to enhance the communication technology. However, communication problems persist even in the presence of robust technology. Several studies of communication have examined the consequences of the spatial distribution of operators working on the achievement of a common goal. Yet, few have researchers have investigated the effects of temporal distribution. Drawing on documentation of the Deepwater Horizon Accident in 2010, we select examples to reveal the temporal distribution of events that affect the availability of contextual information across a socio-technical system. We claim that temporal distance, like spatial distance, reduces global awareness and the opportunity to observe the incidental behaviour that renders activities mutually accessible.

Keywords

Communication Information sharing Temporal dispersion Distributed work 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Valerie Shalin’s participation in this project is supported by NSF Grant 1520870, Srinivasan Parthasarathy Principal Investigator.

References

  1. 1.
    Quarantelli EL (1986) Disaster crisis management (Preliminary paper #113). Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware (1986)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lagadec P (1995) Le dirigeant et les crises. Administration, revue de l’administration territoriales de l’Etat, n° 166Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dautun C (2007) Contribution à l’étude des crises de grande ampleur : connaissance et aide à la décision pour la Sécurité Civile (Doctoral dissertation). Thèse pour obtenir le grade de docteur de l’Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Saint-EtienneGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Van Cott HP, Kinkade RG (1972) Human engineering guide to equipment design. Revised edn. U.S. Government Printing Office, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Endsley MR (1988) Design and evaluation for situation awareness enhancement. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, vol. 32, no. 2. SAGE Publications, pp 97–101Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stanton NA, Salmon PM, Walker GH, Jenkins D (2009) Genotype and phenotype schemata and their role in distributed situation awareness in collaborative systems. Theoret Issues Ergon Sci 10(1):43–68.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14639220802045199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Salas E, Cooke NJ, Rosen MA (2008) On teams, teamwork, and team performance: discoveries and developments. Hum Factors J Hum Factors Ergon Soc 50(3):540–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dourish P, Bellotti V (1992) Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces. In: Proceedings of the conference on computer-supported cooperative work, Toronto, pp 107–114Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Monge P, Rothman L, Eisenberg E, Miller K, Kirste K (1985) The dynamics of organizational proximity. Manage Sci. 31(9):1129–1141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Van den Bulte C, Moenaert R (1998) The effects of R&D team co-location on communication patterns among R&D, marketing, and manufacturing. Manage Sci 44(11):S1–S18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Forsyth DR (1998) Methodological advances in the study of group dynamics. Group Dyn. Theory Res Pract 2(4):211–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Luff P, Heath C (2000) The collaborative production of computer commands in command and control. Int J Hum Comput Stud 52(4):669–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Scott SD, Cummings ML, Graeber DA, Nelson WT, Bolia RS (2006) Collaboration technology in military team operations: lessons learned from the corporate domain. In: CCRTS: command and control research and technology symposium, San Diego, CA, June 2006Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Allen TJ (1977) Managing the flow of technology. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cramton C (2001) The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences in dispersed collaboration. Organ Sci 12(3):346–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Herbsleb JD, Mockus A, Finholt TA, Grinter RE (2000) Distance, dependencies, and delay in a global collaboration. In: Proceedings, ACM conference on computer-supported cooperative work, Philadelphia, PA, 2–7 December pp 319–328Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kraut R, Galegher J, Egido C (1988) Tasks and relationships in scientific research collaborations. Hum Comput Interact 3:31–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zahn GL (1991) Face-to-face communication in an office setting: the effects of position, proximity, and exposure. Commun Res 18(6):737–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ernstsen J, Villanger D, Thomas H (2014) Situation awareness in disaster management: a study of a norwegian collaboration exercise. Universitetet i OsloGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Olson GM, Olson JS (2000) Distance matters. Hum Comput Interact 15:139–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Karsenty L (1999) Cooperative work and shared visual context: An empirical study of comprehension problems in side-by-side and remote help dialogues. Hum Comput Interact 14:283–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Franke J, Charoy F, El Khoury P (2010) Collaborative coordination of activities with temporal dependencies. In: 18th International conference on cooperative information systems (COOPIS’2010)/OnTheMove (OTM) conferences, October 2010, CreteGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Liberman N, Sagristano M, Trope Y (2002) The effect of temporal distance on level of mental construal. J Exp Soc Psychol 38:523–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gilovich T, Kerr M, Medvec VH (1993) Effect of temporal perspective on subjective confidence. J Pers Soc Psychol 64:552–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nisan M (1972) Dimension of time in relation to choice behavior and achievement orientation. J Pers Soc Psychol 57:660–671Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Liu S, Palen L (2009) Spatiotemporal mashups: a survey of current tools to inform next generation crisis support. In: Proceedings of the 2009 information systems for crisis response and management conference (ISCRAM 2009), Gothenberg, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling (2011a), Report to the President. https://cybercemetery.unt.edu/archive/oilspill/20121211005728/http://www.oilspillcommission.gov/sites/default/files/documents/DEEPWATER_ReporttothePresident_FINAL.pdf. Accessed 9 Dec 2017)
  28. 28.
    National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling (2011b) Chief counsel’s report. http://www.iadc.org/archived-2014-osc-report/documents/C21462-407_CCR_for_print_0.pdf. Accessed 9 Dec 2017)
  29. 29.
    Timeline of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_Deepwater_Horizon_oil_spill. Last edited 2 Apr 2018
  30. 30.
    Sharit J (2012) Human error and human reliability analysis. In: Salvendy G (ed) Handbood of human factors and ergonomics, 4th edn. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 734–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Perrow C (1984) Normal accidents: living with high risk technologies. Princeton University Press, Princeton. (Revised edition, 1999)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Reason JT (1990) Human error. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zhang J, Norman D (1994) Representations in distributed cognitive tasks. Cogn Sci 18:87–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Béatrice Linot
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jérôme Dinet
    • 1
  • François Charoy
    • 2
  • Valerie L. Shalin
    • 3
  1. 1.Lorraine University, 2LPNNancyFrance
  2. 2.Lorraine University, LORIANancyFrance
  3. 3.Wright State UniversityDaytonUSA

Personalised recommendations