Validity of Using Lab Based Set-Ups for Evaluation of Static Factors in Seating Comfort of Motorcycles

  • Sai Praveen VelagapudiEmail author
  • Gaur Gopal Ray
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 824)


Seating comfort in automobiles has two important factors, static factors and dynamic factors. Research on static factors of seating comfort often uses static lab based test set-ups to evaluate comfort. Studies, especially in passenger cars, have shown that there is no significant difference in the ratings of seating comfort between lab based set-ups and actual driving. The riding posture, mass distribution and dynamics of a motorcycle are unlike a passenger car and warrant further examination to use static lab based set-ups. The aim of the current study is to examine the validity of using static lab based set-up to evaluate static factors of seating comfort in motorcycles. A group of 18 male volunteers from TVS Motor Company participated in the study. The study involves subjective rating of seating comfort and measurement of seat interface pressure in a static lab based set up as well as actual driving in a flat test track for two motorcycles. The results show that there is no significant difference in the subjective rating of comfort as well as the seat interface pressure between static lab based set-up and actual riding(paired t-test, p > 0.7). There is also a statistically significant correlation between the subjective ratings of seating comfort in static lab based set-up and actual riding (r = 0.77, p < 0.01, n = 36).



We thank all the volunteers for participating in this study. We thank Dr. Venkatamanga Raju, R. Babu and the management of TVS Motor Company for providing the necessary support for carrying out and publishing this study.


  1. 1.
    Zhang L, Helander MG, Drury CG (1996) Identifying factors of comfort and discomfort in sitting. Hum Fact: Int J Industr Ergon 38(3):377–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kyung G, Nussbaum MA, Reeves KB (2008) Driver sitting comfort and discomfort (part I): use of subjective rating scales in discriminating car seats and correspondence among ratings. Int J Industr Ergon 38:516–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Richards LC (1980) On psychology of passenger comfort. In: Oborne DJ, Levins JA (eds) Human factors in transport research. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kolich M (2000) Ergonomic modeling and evaluation of automobile seat comfort. PhD thesis, University of Windsor, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ebe K, Griffin MJ (2000) Qualitative models of seat discomfort including static and dynamic factors. Ergonomics 43(6):771–790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mansfield NJ, Mackrill J, Rimell AN, MacMull SJ (2014) Combined effects of long-term sitting and whole-body vibration on discomfort onset for vehicle occupants. ISRN Autom Eng 2014:8 Article ID 852607Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zenk R, Mergl C, Hartung J, Sabbah O, Bubb H (2006) Objectifying the comfort of car seats. In: SAE Conference 2006, SAE Paper 2006-01-1299Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sai Praveen V, Ray GG (2017) Development of a motorcycle seating comfort questionnaire. Hum Factors. Scholar
  9. 9.
    Velagapudi SP, Ray GG (2015) A study on motorcycle usage and comfort in urban India. In: Proceedings of the 19th triennial congress of the IEA, 9–14 August 2015, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kulkarni D, Ranjan S, Chitodkar V, Gurjar V, Ghaisas CV, Mannikar AV (2011) SIZE INDIA- Anthropometric Size Measurement of Indian Driving Population. In: Symposium on International Automotive Technology, SAE Paper, 2011-26-0108Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    de Looze MP, Kuijt-Evers LFM, van Dieen J (2003) Sitting comfort and discomfort and the relationships with objective measures. Ergonomics 46(10):985–997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Velagapudi SP, Ray GG (2015) Reliability and validity of seat interface pressure to quantify seating comfort in motorcycles. In: Proceedings of the 19th triennial congress of the IEA, 9–14 August 2015, MelbourneGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IDCIndian Institute of TechnologyBombayIndia
  2. 2.Lead Engineer – Ergonomics, Research and DevelopmentTVS Motor CompanyChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations