Advertisement

The Collective Work in the Subsea Integrated Operations Centre: The Ad Hoc Teams in the Solution of Unexpected Situations

  • N. C. Maia
  • F. Duarte
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 824)

Abstract

In order to increase of production in fields ever more distant from the coast, to reduce cost and increase the operational reliability, the oil industry has developed onshore-offshore integration projects. The construction of new spaces to sustain more collaborative ways of working have become challenges for the management and project teams of the petroleum producing companies.

From observations of the operators’ work and of the participation in a project of an integrated operations centre, the main characteristics of the operator’s activity are presented, based on the interactions between the teams. are presented.

This research highlights the specificity of the collective dimension of the activity. Ad hoc teams are formed to address unforeseen occurrences. The dynamicity of the activities contrasts with the structuring of processes through procedures, used by the company, as a basis for the conception of future work in these new environments. The constant unexpected situations contribute to the instability of the work activities.

Keywords

Integrated operations Collective work Ad hoc teams 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the staff of subsea services unit and in particular, the operators and engineers who enabled this study.

References

  1. Arnoud J (2013) Conception organisationnelle: pour des interventions capacitantes. Thèse de Doctorat, Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers (CNAM), ParisGoogle Scholar
  2. Bødker K, Kensing F, Simonsen J (2004) Participatory IT design: designing for business and workplace realities. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Caroly S (2010) L’ activité collective et la réélaboration des règles: des enjeux pour la santé au travail. Habilitation a diriger des recherches, Université Bordeaux 2, FranceGoogle Scholar
  4. Caroly S, Barcellini F (2013) Le développement de l´activité collective. In: Ergonomie Constructive, Presses Universitaires de France, pp 33–45Google Scholar
  5. Cuvelier L, Falzon P (2015) The collective construction of safety: a trade-off between “understanding” and “doing” in managing dynamic situations. Appl Ergon 47:117–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Darses F, Falzon P (1996) La conception collective: une approche de l’ergonomie cognitive. In: de Terssac G, Friedberg E (eds) Coopération et Conception, 1ère édition, Octares Édition, pp 123–135Google Scholar
  7. Edwards T, Mydland Ø, Henriquez A (2010) The Art of Intelligent Energy (iE) – Insights and Lessons Learned from the Application of iE. SPE Intelligent Energy Conference and Exhibition, SPE 128669, Netherlands, MarchGoogle Scholar
  8. Engeström Y (2008) Quand le centre se dérobe: la notion de knotworking et ses promesses. Sociologie du Travail 50:303–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hepsø V (2006) When are we going to address organizational robustness and collaboration as something else than a residual factor? SPE Intelligent Energy Conference and Exhibition, SPE 100712, Amsterdam, AprilGoogle Scholar
  10. Huguet MJ, de Terssac G, Erschler J, Lompré N (2002) De la realité orgnisationnelle à la modélisation de la cooperation. In: Daniellou F, de Terssac G, Schwartz Y (eds) Le Travail: une aventure collective, Toulouse, Octares Éditions, 1ére ed, chapitre 9, pp 129–148Google Scholar
  11. Lauche K, Sawaryn SJ, Thorogood JL (2009) Human-factors implications of remote drilling operations: a case study from the north sea. In: SPE intelligent energy conference and exhibition, SPE 99774, Amsterdam, AprilGoogle Scholar
  12. Lorino P (2005) Théories des organisations, sens et action: le cheminement historique, du rationalisme à la genèse instrumentale des organisations. In: Teulier R, Lorino P (eds) Entre connaissance et organisation: l’activité collective – L’entrepise face au défi de la connaissance. Éditions La Découverte, Paris, pp 54–71Google Scholar
  13. Maggi B (2006) Do agir organizacional – Um ponto de vista sobre o trabalho, o bem-estar, a aprendizagem, São Paulo, ed Edgard Blücher LtdaGoogle Scholar
  14. Terssac G (2002) Travail et régulations sociales”. In: Daniellou F, de Terssac G, Schwartz Y (eds) Le Travail: une aventure collective, Toulouse, Octares Éditions, 1ére ed, chapitre 6, pp 79–90Google Scholar
  15. Terssac G, Lompré N (1994) Coordination et Coopération dans les Organisations. In: Pavard B (ed) Systémes Coopératifs: de la modélisation à la conception, Toulouse, Octares Éditions, 1ére ed, chapitre 1, pp 175–201Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidade Federal do Rio de JaneiroRio de JaneiroBrazil

Personalised recommendations