eSports: Opportunities for Future Ergonomic Studies

  • Viktoriya LipovayaEmail author
  • Patricia Costa
  • Pedro Grillo
  • Aleksandr Volosiuk
  • Aleksandra Sopina
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 824)


Professional electronic sports (eSports) is an emerging professional and academic field. It presents a unique combination of an electronic/online world and traditional sports. Its activity is computer-mediated, but has all characteristics of traditional sports: training routine, tournaments agenda, high pressure from eSports fans base, relations with sponsors, and others. This unique position has raised concerns of the professionals regarding the quality of standards, professionalization and formalization of this activity field. The aim of this article is to fill the gap in ergonomics studies on eSports, in particular, to generalize the knowledge about this new professional area, and also to reflect on the prospects of future ergonomic studies in this field. How is this professional world and professional area developing? What problems and new demands arise from this? We used an exploratory and qualitative methodology in three main phases: (1) Exploratory interviews with eSports professionals in order to understand and define existing problems in this new area; (2) Academic literature review on the topic; (3) An ergonomic intervention at one of the first Brazilian eSports enterprises, located in Rio de Janeiro. Ergonomic Work Analysis was employed to help an eSports team’s owner to investigate the problems of his eSports team formation. As a result, we reveal the main problems of the Brazilian eSports market, present preliminary ergonomic intervention results and highlight paths for future research.


eSports Ergonomic Work Analysis Problem building Ergonomics studies 


  1. 1.
    Jenny SE, Manning RD, Keiper MC, Olrich TW (2017) Virtual(ly) athletes: where eSports fit within the definition of “sport”. Quest 69(1):1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Martončik M (2015) e-Sports: playing just for fun or playing to satisfy life goals? Comput Hum Behav 48:208–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shirobakina EA (2016) Cyber sport: from just a hobby to a professional sport. Sci Methodical J: Phys Educ Sports Training 3(17):60–63Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Freeman G, Wohn DY (2017) Understanding eSports team formation and coordination. In: Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW), pp 1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Freeman G, Wohn DY (2017) eSports as an emerging research context at CHI: diverse perspectives on definitions. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, CHI EA 2017. ACM, Denver, pp 1.601–1.608Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wagner MG (2006) On the scientific relevance of eSport. In: Proceedings of the 2006 international conference on internet computing and conference on computer games development. CSREA Press, Las Vegas, pp 437–440Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hamari J, Sjöblom M (2017) What is eSports and why do people watch it? Internet Res 27(2):211–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Weiss T (2011) Fulfilling the needs of eSports consumers: a uses and gratifications perspective. In: Bled 2011 eConference proceedings, Bled, Slovenia, pp 572–580Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Weiss T (2008) Cultural influences on hedonic adoption behavior: propositions regarding the adoption of competitive video and computer online gaming. In: DIGIT 2008 proceedings. DIGIT, Paris, pp 1–20Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hamilton W, Kerne A, Robbins T (2012) High-performance pen + touch modality interactions: a real-time strategy game eSports context. In: Proceedings of the 25th annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology, UIST 2012. ACM, Cambridge, pp 309–318Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hamilton W, Kerne A, Moeller J (2012) Pen-in-hand command: NUI for real-time strategy eSports. In: Extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, CHI EA 2012. ACM, Austin, pp. 1.455–1.456Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kaytoue M, Silva A, Cerf L, Meira W Jr, Raïssi C (2012) Watch me playing, I am a professional: a first study on video game live streaming. In: Companion proceedings of the 21st international conference on world wide web, WWW 2012. ACM, Lyon, pp 1.181–1.188Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kow YM, Young T (2013) Media technologies and learning in the starcraft eSport community. In: Proceedings of the 2013 conference on computer supported cooperative work, CSCW 2013. ACM, San Antonio, pp 387–398Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Leavitt A, Keegan BC, Clark J (2016) Ping to win? Non-verbal communication and team performance in competitive online multiplayer games. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI 2016. ACM, San Jose, pp 4.337–4.350Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    McClelland P, Whitmell S, Scott S (2011) Investigating communication and social practices in real-time strategy games: are in-game tools sufficient to support the overall gaming experience? In: Proceedings of graphics interface 2011, (GI 2011), St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada, pp 215–222Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lee D, Schoenstedt LJ (2011) Comparison of eSports and traditional sports consumption motives. ICHPER-SD J Res 6(2):39–44Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Seo Y (2016) Professionalized consumption and identity transformations in the field of eSports. J Bus Res 69(1):264–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Taylor TL (2012) Raising the stakes: E-sports and the professionalization of computer gaming, 1st edn. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Béguin P (2010) Conduite de projet et fabrication collective du travail: une approche développementale. Research direction habilitation (mention: ergonomics). École Doctorale: Sciences Sociales: Société, Santé, Décision. Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2 University, Bordeaux, FranceGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Olympic Council of Asia. Accessed 25 May 2018
  21. 21.
    Hallmann K, Giel T (2018) eSports – Competitive sports or recreational activity? Sport Manag Rev 21(1):14–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
  23. 23.
    British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC). Accessed 13 Dec 2017
  24. 24.
  25. 25.
  26. 26.
    Moore JF (1996) The death of competition: leadership and strategy in the age of business ecosystems, 1st edn. Harper Business, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lipovaya V, Ikenami RK, Miranda G, Duarte F (2017) Ecossistemas Inovadores eSports: o caso da empresa SUPERNOVA. In: X Congresso de Administração, Sociedade e Inovação – CASI 2017. CASI, Petrópolis, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, pp 1–13Google Scholar
  28. 28.
  29. 29.
    Rodgers B (1977) Rationalising sports policies: sport in its social context: international comparisons, 1st edn. Council of Europe Committee on Sport, StrasbourgGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rudolf K, Grieben C, Achtzehn S, Froböse I (2016) Stress im eSport – Training und Wettkampf. eSport Konferenz “Professionalisierung einer Subkultur?”, Bayreuth, Deutschland, 1Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wisner A (1995) Understanding problem building: ergonomic work analysis. Ergonomics 38(3):595–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Béguin P (2003) Design as a mutual learning process between users and designers. Interact Comput 15(5):709–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Guérin F, Laville T, Daniellou F, Duraffourg J, Kerguelen A (1997) Comprendre le travail pour le transformer: la pratique de l’Ergonomie, 2nd edn. ANACT, LyonGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Daniellou F (2007) A ergonomia na condução de projetos de concepção de sistemas de trabalho. In: Falzon P (ed) Ergonomia, 1st edn. Edgard Blücher, São PauloGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Garrigou A, Daniellou F, Carballeda G, Ruaud S (1995) Activity analysis in participatory design and analysis of participatory design activity. Int J Ind Ergon 15(5):311–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lipovaya V, Lima Y, Grillo P, Barbosa C, Moreira J, Duarte F (2018) Coordination, communication, and competition in eSports: a comparative analysis of teams in two action games. In: Proceedings of the 16th European conference on computer supported cooperative work - exploratory papers, ECSCW 2018. European Society for Socially Embedded Technologies (EUSSET), Nancy, pp 1–26Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Theureau J (2010) Les entretiens d’autoconfrontation et de remise en situation par les traces matérielles et le programme de recherche « cours d’action». Revue d’anthropologie des connaissances 4(2):287–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Heere B (2018) Embracing the sportification of society: defining e-sports through a polymorphic view on sport. Sport Manag Rev 21(1):21–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Skubida D (2016) Can some computer games be a sport?: Issues with legitimization of eSport as a sporting activity. Int J Gaming Comput-Mediated Simul (IJGCMS) 8(4):38–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Funk DC, Pizzo AD, Baker BJ (2018) eSport management: embracing eSport education and research opportunities. Sport Manag Rev 21(1):7–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Scholz TM, Stein V (2017) Going beyond ambidexterity in the media industry: eSports as pioneer of ultradexterity. Int J Gaming Comput-Mediated Simul (IJGCMS) 9(2):47–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Carrillo Vera JA (2016) De jugadores a espectadores - La construcción del espectáculo mediático en el contexto de los e-sports. Anàlisi - Quaderns de Comunicació i Cultura 55:1–16Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Taylor NT (2016) Now you’re playing with audience power: the work of watching games. Crit Stud Media Commun 33(4):293–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Salo M (2017) Career transitions of eSports Athletes: a proposal for a research framework. Int J Gaming Comput-Mediated Simul (IJGCMS) 9(2):22–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Brickell A (2017) Addressing integrity and regulatory risks in eSports: the responsibility of the whole eSports. Gaming Law Rev 21(8):603–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Sylvester R, Rennie P (2017) The world’s fastest-growing sport: maximizing the economic success of eSports whilst balancing regulatory concerns and ensuring the protection of those involved. Gaming Law Rev 21(8):625–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Brock T (2017) Roger Caillois and e-sports: on the problems of treating play as work. Games Cult 12(4):321–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Karhulahti V-M (2015) Reconsidering eSport: economics and executive ownership. Phys Cult Sport Stud Res 74(1):43–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Heaven D (2014) Rise and rise of eSports. NewScientist 223(2.982):17Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Davidovici-Nora M (2017) E-Sport as leverage for growth strategy: the example of league of legends. Int J Gaming Comput-Mediated Simul (IJGCMS) 9(2):33–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Daniellou F (2004) Questões epistemológicas levantadas pela ergonomia de projeto. In: Daniellou F et al (eds) A ergonomia em busca de seus princípios: debates epistemológicos, 1st edn. Edgard Blücher, São PauloGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Rosier A, Gotteland C, Béguin P, Puyeo V (2015) Analysing professional transitions underway in an experimental project on energy efficiency. In: The proceedings of the 19th triennial congress of the international ergonomics association – IEA 2015. IEA, Melbourne, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Lipovaya V (2015) Construção de uma interface dialógica a partir da análise da atividade: o caso do projeto de um restaurante universitário. Doctoral Thesis in Production Engineering. Coppe—Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Bittencourt JMV (2014) Expressão da experiência de trabalho em projeto: argumentos para uma engenharia de objetos intermediários. Doctoral Thesis in Production Engineering. Coppe—Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Viktoriya Lipovaya
    • 1
    Email author
  • Patricia Costa
    • 1
    • 2
  • Pedro Grillo
    • 1
  • Aleksandr Volosiuk
    • 3
  • Aleksandra Sopina
    • 4
  1. 1.Production Engineering Program, Coppe, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (PEP | Coppe | UFRJ)Rio de JaneiroBrazil
  2. 2.EVS (UMR 5600), Lumière Lyon 2 UniversityLyonFrance
  3. 3.Inter-Regional Ergonomics Association (IREA)Obninsk, Kaluzhskaya obl.Russia
  4. 4.Department of Foreign LanguagesSaint Petersburg State Electrotechnical UniversitySaint PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations