Advertisement

Mini-User Testing Practice During Agile Development: The Results of a Survey Conducted with User Centric Specialists

  • Mathilde Cosquer
  • Dominique Deuff
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 824)

Abstract

In ergonomic practices, user testing is a central method to get feed-back from users regarding usability. In the last decade, new design methods have emerged like agile method, design thinking, lean startup. Most of these methods are looking for direct user’s feedback. In this context, in 2013 we published a book “user-centered agile method” which goal was to propose a method which enables to have continuous user’s feedback during the entire life circle of a project integrating agile development. Our approach was to take advantage of agile method to apply user testing also during development that is, during each agile iteration. We call this kind of user testing, applying around five participants, “mini-user testing”. Four years later, we wanted to evaluate the usage of “mini user testing” during agile development, into our ergonomists community and what it could imply regarding the evolution of these community’s practices. To answer these questions, we built a questionnaire which was filled by two survey populations. This article reports the results of this study.

Keywords

User-testing evaluation Agile method Survey 

References

  1. 1.
    Agile manifesto homepage. http://agilemanifesto.org/
  2. 2.
    Ambler SW (2008) Tailoring usability into agile software development projects. In: Law EL-C, Hvannberg ET, Cockton G (eds) Maturing usability. HIS. Springer, London, pp 75–95.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-941-5_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brown T (2009) Change by design: how design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. HarperBusiness, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Deuff D, Cosquer M (2013) User-centered agile method. ISTE Ltd., LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Faulkner L (2003) Beyond the five-user assumption: benefits of increased sample sizes in usability testing. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 35(3):379–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    ISO 9241-210 (2010) Ergonomics of human-system interaction – part 210: human-centred design for interactive systemsGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Memmel T, Gundelsweiler F, Reiterer H (2007) CRUISER: a cross-discipline user interface and software engineering lifecycle. In: Human-computer interaction. Interaction design and usability, pp 174–183Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nielsen J, Landauer TK (1993) A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems. In: Proceedings of the INTERACT 1993 and CHI 1993. ACM, pp 206–213Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nielsen J (2012) How many test users in a usability study? https://www.nngroup.com/articles/how-many-test-users/
  10. 10.
    Ries E (2011) The lean startup - how today’s entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses. Crown Business, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sy D (2007) Adapting usability investigations for agile user-centered design. J Usability Stud 2(3):112–132MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Woolrych A, Cockton G (2001) Why and when five test users aren’t enough? In: Proceedings of the conference, IHM-HCI 2001, pp 105–108Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Orange TechnocentreLannionFrance

Personalised recommendations