Advertisement

Developing a Framework for a Participatory Ergonomics Design Processes: The MPEC Method

  • Daniel Braatz
  • Esdras Paravizo
  • Monica Vieira Garcia Campos
  • Claudia Ferreira Mazzoni
  • Carla Aparecida Gonçalves Sirqueira
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 824)

Abstract

Ergonomics is considered a design-driven discipline although several challenges hinder its incorporation into the design process such as the articulation of the several actors involved. In this paper we present and discuss a framework for participatory ergonomics design processes focusing on its validation in three real-life design projects. The development of the framework started from a literature review, focusing on existing methods for participatory ergonomics. Seven tools and techniques were selected and structured as a framework which was then validated in three pilot studies (redesign of an industrial kitchen, public hospital sector and large steel industry sector). From the cases, we saw that the framework enabled participants to interact and contribute in different contexts (by themselves, in small groups, collectively) in different stages of the design process while also allowing for the development of several alternative solutions which can be further explored through simulations. It also directs the organization towards concrete changes through detailing and prioritizing of possible solutions and the establishment of a shared view of the planned implementations. Results show that the tools and techniques when employed in an articulated and integrated way supported the development of conceptual designs from a collaborative perspective. The Brazilian context in which this framework was developed, presents several other challenges that must be better understood. Furthermore, as the Ergonomic Workplace Analysis provides a structured intervention method, this framework can assist practitioners and researchers to better structure their participatory ergonomics design approach using integrated and efficient methods and techniques.

Keywords

Simulation Participatory design Collaborative design 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the Center for Innovation in Ergonomics from SESI-FIEMG. Without their incommensurable support it would not have been possible to develop the framework, nor this paper reporting its development and applications. For further information regarding the MPEC application please contact Monica Vieira Garcia Campos (m.garcia@fiemg.com.br).

References

  1. Akao Y, Mazur GH (2003) The leading edge in QFD: past, present and future. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 20:20–35.  https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710310453791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersen SN, Broberg O (2015) Participatory ergonomics simulation of hospital work systems: The influence of simulation media on simulation outcome. Appl Ergon 51:331–342.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2015.06.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barcellini F, Van Belleghem L (2014) Organizational simulation: issues for ergonomics and for teaching of ergonomics’ action. In: 11th International symposium on human factors in organizational design and management 46th annual nordic ergonomics society conference pp 885–890Google Scholar
  4. Béguin P (2007) Taking activity into account during the design process. Activités 4:115–121.  https://doi.org/10.4000/activites.1727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Braatz D (2015) Suportes De Simulação Como Objetos Intermediários Para Incorporação Da Perspectiva Da Atividade Na Concepção De Situações Produtivas. Tese de Doutorado. Universidade Federal de São CarlosGoogle Scholar
  6. Broberg O, Andersen V, Seim R (2011) Participatory ergonomics in design processes: the role of boundary objects. Appl Ergon 42:464–472.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2010.09.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Daniellou F (2005) The French-speaking ergonomists’ approach to work activity: Cross-influences of field intervention and conceptual models. Theor Issues Ergon Sci 6:409–427.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14639220500078252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Daniellou F, Rabardel P (2005) Activity-oriented approaches to ergonomics: some traditions and communities. Theor Issues Ergon Sci 6:353–357.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14639220500078351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Tague NR (2005) The Quality Toolbox, 2nd edn. Milwaukee, WisconsinGoogle Scholar
  10. Wisner A (1995) Understanding problem building: ergonomic work analysis. Ergonomics 38:595–605.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139508925133CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Braatz
    • 1
  • Esdras Paravizo
    • 1
  • Monica Vieira Garcia Campos
    • 2
  • Claudia Ferreira Mazzoni
    • 2
  • Carla Aparecida Gonçalves Sirqueira
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Production EngineeringFederal University of Sao CarlosSao CarlosBrazil
  2. 2.Center for Innovation in Ergonomics, SESI-FIEMGBelo HorizonteBrazil

Personalised recommendations