Advertisement

Innovative Scenarios and Products for Sport Outdoor: The Challenge of Design for Citizens’ Wellness and Health

  • Francesca Tosi
  • Giuseppe Fedele
  • Alessia Brischetto
  • Mattia Pistolesi
  • Daniele Busciantella Ricci
  • Alessandra Rinaldi
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 824)

Abstract

Increasing physical activity and physical education are very important issues to overcome ageing population, but require the development of a conscious attitude of citizens towards their own health. Ergonomics for Design and methods of the Human-centred design and User Experience may allow outlining possible solutions for increasing human expectations towards active life, wellness and prevention. This paper presents the results of the Wellness Outdoor workshop, promoted by the Laboratory of Ergonomics and Design (LED) of the University of Florence in collaboration with Technogym, a leading-edge company that develops fitness equipment for any physical activity. Main aims of the workshop were to define and design novel scenarios and systems concepts for outdoor fitness. To this aim, we followed a first research step based on focus groups, personas methods, user observations and Task Analysis, which led to the definition of user needs and context-of-use. Then, brainstorming activities driven by scenarios-based design and parallel design sessions proved to be effective for outlining inputs and ideas generation. Finally, in the present work four system concepts, named S.O.Fiber, Hexagon Space, Outdoor Training and Develop, are presented.

Keywords

Fitness outdoor Urban innovation Human-centred design User Experience 

Notes

Acknowledgments

A special thanks to the Technogym company, in particular to the engineers Giuseppe Fedele and Francesco Calcaterra, for contributing to the realization of the Wellness Outdoor workshop. We also thank the designers who participated in the workshop: The Turkish Rosary, Angelo Iannotta, Wang Haoyu, Gabbatore Stefano, Cristina De Alfieri, Wu Fang Yuan, Niccolò Mazzoni, Alessio Tanzini, Matilda Muscatello, Le Diem Huong, Vu Tuong Quyen, Gianluigi Cantanamessa, Mariana Motta, Ester Nerini, Carolina Oliveira, Pu Ling Xing, Valentina Zamorano, Eleonora Didio, Rachele Nencioni, Wang Xiang, Ji Lu, Liu Xu, Martino Nicola, Monica Moggia, Soheil Ehsani, Maria Borrego, Armando Moreno.

References

  1. 1.
    World Health Organization (2010) Global recommendations on physical activity for health. WHO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    World Health Organization (2003) Health and development through physical activity and sport. WHO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tosi F, Rinaldi A, Busciantella Ricci D, Pistolesi M, Brischetto A (2016) Ergonomics evaluation and redesign of workstation to prototyping of luxury garments. In: XI Congresso nazionale SIE 2016, NapoliGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sport and physical activity report (2014) Special Eurobarometer 412. European Commission, Directorate-General for Education and Culture, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lee IM, Shiroma EJ, Lobelo F, Puska P, Blair SN, Katzmarzyk PT (2012) Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet 380:219–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Corbin CB, Lindsey R, Welk GJ, Corbin WR (2002) Concepts of fitness and wellness: a comprehensive lifestyle approach, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, BostonGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Maguire M (2001) Methods to support human-centred design. Int J Hum Comput Stud 55(4):587–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tosi F (2006) Ergonomia e progetto. Franco Angeli, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    ISO 9241-210:2010, Ergonomics of human-system interaction, part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Verganti R (2009) Design-driven innovation: changing the rules of competition by radically innovating what things mean. BostonGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Von Hippel E (2007) An emerging hotbed of user-centered innovation. Harvard Bus Rev 85(2):27–28Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Giacomin J (2014) What is human centred design? Des J 17(4):606–623MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hollnagel E, Woods DD (2005) Joint cognitive systems: foundations of cognitive system engineering. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Triberti S, Brivio E (2016) User Experience, Psicologia degli oggetti, degli utenti e dei con-testi d’uso, Apogeo Education, Maggioli Editore, Santarcangelo di RomagnaGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Clarkson PJ, Coleman R, Hosking I, Waller S (2007) Inclusive design toolkit. Engineering Design Centre, University of Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pruitt J, Grudin J (2003) Personas: practice and theory. In: Proceedings of the 2003 conference on designing for user experiences, June 2003. ACM, pp 1–15Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ericsson KA, Simon HA (1985) Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hollnagel E (2012) Task analysis, why, what and how. In: Handbook of human factors and ergonomics, vol 4, pp 385–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rosson MB, Carroll JM (2002) Usability engineering: scenario-based development of human-computer interaction. Morgan Kaufmann, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francesca Tosi
    • 1
  • Giuseppe Fedele
    • 2
  • Alessia Brischetto
    • 1
  • Mattia Pistolesi
    • 1
  • Daniele Busciantella Ricci
    • 1
  • Alessandra Rinaldi
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Ergonomics and Design, Department of ArchitectureUniversity of FlorenceCalenzanoItaly
  2. 2.Technogym Research CenterCesenaItaly

Personalised recommendations