Advertisement

The Environmental Contribution to Wayfinding in Museums: Enhancement and Usage by Controlling Flows and Paths

  • Federica Romagnoli
  • Teresa Villani
  • Angelo Oddi
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 825)

Abstract

The field of research in which wayfinding is situated refers to the way people move in reaction to environmental stimulation. It therefore fully concerns not just signage but also space designing, its geometric configuration, technical solutions and their material characterization. The focus is consequently on environmental factors that facilitate wayfinding in a museum (accessibility, visibility, etc.) and on other elements such as spatial configuration, architectural features and functional aspects. These factors influence relational phenomena and therefore visitors’ satisfaction. Methods and tools for designing and managing spaces have been studied in the research. The configurational analysis method of space has been used to objectify syntactic features of space. In particular, the outcomes of an experimental project, which have been analyzed in a master’s thesis on the re-functionalization of the museum of Palazzo dei Diamanti in Ferrara, are presented. Permeability, proximity, connections of spaces, namely meaningful features to ensure wayfinding have been examined. Space parameters resulting from the geometry of the layout, from the visual connections and from the changes of direction were then evaluated. The outcomes have been used as inputs for designing a unitary tour route circuit, that also reconnects the museum’s second floor, and for planning three independent alternative routes for a differentiated use of the museum.

Keywords

Wayfinding Museum Configurational analysis Space syntax 

References

  1. 1.
    Thorndyke PW, Hayes-Roth B (1992) Difference in spatial knowledge acquired from maps and navigation. Cogn Psychol 12:560–589Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lynch K (1960) The Image of the City. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Passini R (1984) Wayfinding in Architecture. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Villani T, Silvestri A (2016) Wayfinding and environmental communication in museums for the promotion of cultural heritage and sustainability. In: Gambardella C (ed) World Heritage and Degradation. Smart Design, Planning and Technologies. La scuola di Pitagora Editrice, Napoli, pp 32–40Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Montella M, Dragoni P (2010) Musei e valorizzazione dei beni culturali. Atti della Commissione per la definizione dei livelli minimi di qualità delle attività di valorizzazione. Clueb, BolognaGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Salgamcioglu ME, Cabadak D (2017) Permanent and temporary museum spaces: a study on human behavior and spatial organization relationship in refunciond warehouse spaces of Karakoy, Istanbul. In: 11th International Proceedings on International Space Syntax Symposium. Instituto Superior Tecnico, Departamento de Engenharia Civil, Arquitetura e Georrecursos, Lisboa, pp 22-1–22-18Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hillier B, Raford N (2010) Description and discovery in socio-spatial analysis: the case of space syntax. In: Walford G et al (eds) The Sage Handbook of Measurement. SAGE, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hillier B, Hanson J (1984) The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hillier B (1996) Space is the Machine: A Configurational Theory of Architecture. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hiller B, Tzortzi K (2011) Space syntax: the language of museum space. In: Macdonald S (ed) A Companion to Museum Studies. Wiley-Blackwell, London, pp 282–301Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tzortzi K (2015) Spatial concepts in museum theory and practice. In: 10th International Proceedings of Space Syntax Symposium, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Penn A (2008) Architectural research. In: Knight A, Ruddock L (eds) Advanced Re-search Methods in the Built Environment. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, pp 14–27Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dursun P (2007) Space syntax in architectural design. In: 6th International Proceedings of the Space Syntax Symposium, InstanbulGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kwon SJ, Sailer K (2015) Seeing and being seen inside a museum and a department store - a comparison study in visibility and co-presence patterns. In: 10th International Proceedings of Space Syntax Symposium, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Choi YK (1999) The morphology of exploration and encounter in museum layouts. Environ Plan 26:241–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tzortzi K (2007) Museum building design and layout: patterns of interaction. In: 6th International Proceedings of Space Syntax Symposium. ITU Faculty of Architecture, Istanbul, pp. 072-01–072-15Google Scholar
  17. 17.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Federica Romagnoli
    • 1
  • Teresa Villani
    • 1
  • Angelo Oddi
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Planning, Design and Technology of ArchitectureSapienza University of RomeRomeItaly
  2. 2.CNR, National Research Council of ItalyRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations