Advertisement

Proposal of an Intuitive Interface Structure for Ergonomics Evaluation Software

  • Aitor Iriondo Pascual
  • Dan Högberg
  • Ari Kolbeinsson
  • Pamela Ruiz Castro
  • Nafise Mahdavian
  • Lars Hanson
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 825)

Abstract

Nowadays, different technologies and software for ergonomics evaluations are gaining greater relevance in the field of ergonomics and production development. The tools allow users such as ergonomists and engineers to perform assessments of ergonomic conditions of work, both related to work simulated in digital human modelling (DHM) tools or based on recordings of work performed by real operators. Regardless of approach, there are many dimensions of data that needs to be processed and presented to the users.

The users may have a range of different expectations and purposes from reading the data. Examples of situations are to: judge and compare different design solutions; analyse data in relation to anthropometric differences among subjects; investigate different body regions; assess data based on different time perspectives; and to perform assessments according to different types of ergonomics evaluation methods. The range of different expectations and purposes from reading the data increases the complexity of creating an interface that considers all the necessary tools and functions that the users require, while at the same time offer high usability.

This paper focuses on the structural design of a flexible and intuitive interface for an ergonomics evaluation software that possesses the required tools and functions to analyse work situations from different perspectives, where the data input can be either from DHM tools or from real operators while performing work.

Keywords

Ergonomics Interface Data management 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work has been made possible with the support from Vinnova/UDI in Sweden, in the project Smart Textiles for a Sustainable Work Life, and by the participating organizations. This support is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. 1.
    Sultan-Taïeb H, Parent-Lamarche A, Gaillard A, Nicolakakis N, Hong QN, Vezina M, Coulibaly Y, Vézina N, Berthelette D (2017) Economic evaluations of ergonomic interventions preventing work-related musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review of organizational-level interventions. BMC Public Health 17(1):935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    McAtamney L, Nigel Corlett E (1993) RULA: a survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders. Appl Ergon 24(2):91–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eliasson K, Palm P, Nyman T, Forsman M (2017) Inter- and intra- observer reliability of risk assessment of repetitive work without an explicit method. Appl Ergon 62:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tang A, Lu K, Wang Y, Huang J, Li H (2015) A real-time hand posture recognition system using deep neural networks. ACM Trans Intell Syst Technol 9(4): 23Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lin JH, Kirlik A, Xu X (2018) New technologies in human factors and ergonomics research and practice. Appl Ergon 66:179–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jayaram U, Jayaram S, Shaikh I, Kim Y, Palmer C (2006) Introducing quantitative analysis methods into virtual environments for real-time and continuous ergonomic evaluations. Comput Ind 57(3):283–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Drury CG (2015) Human factors/ergonomics implications of big data analytics: chartered institute of ergonomics and human factors annual lecture. Ergonomics 58(5):659–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Demirel HO, Duffy VG (2017) Applications of digital human modeling in industry. In: Digital human modeling, pp 824–832Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lind C, Forsman M, Rose L (2017) Development and evaluation of RAMP I : a practitioner’s tool for screening of musculoskeletal disorder risk factors in manual handling. Int J Occup Safety Ergon: 1–16Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hignett S, McAtamney L (2000) Rapid entire body assessment (REBA). Appl Ergon 31(2):201–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schaub KG, Mühlstedt J, Illman B, Bauer S, Fritzsche L, Wagner T, Bullinger-Hoffman A (2012) Ergonomic assessment of automotive assembly tasks with digital human modelling and the “ergonomics assessment worksheet” (EAWS). Int J Hum Factors Modell Simul 3(3–4):398–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Engineering ScienceUniversity of SkövdeSkövdeSweden
  2. 2.Scania CVSödertäljeSweden

Personalised recommendations