Advertisement

Playful Learning for Kids with Special Educational Needs

  • Elisabetta Cianfanelli
  • Pierluigi Crescenzi
  • Gabriele Goretti
  • Benedetta Terenzi
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 826)

Abstract

It has been verified that today in the Italian schools there are about 15–20% of students presenting different kinds of “Special Educational Needs”. In order to respond to BES, the schools follow the Customized Learning Plan (PDP), a useful tool for designing operational models, strategies, systems and learning criteria for each student. For the various operators involved in the treatment of the disorders and also for the parents, it is of great importance to have adequate, efficient and flexible support tools that respect the desires and the enthusiasm of children of different age, without creating additional psychological and social discomfort. This research presents a particular relevance focus on the issue of management of entertainment and playful learning through digital systems offering a ‘playful interaction’. New concepts of ‘game’ and ‘device for interactive activities’ offer screen-based compounds to scenarios on the relation between user and device, including physical activities or integrated physical gestures, which relate the observation of screen to the physical reality.

Keywords

Interaction design Product design Playful experience 

References

  1. 1.
    Hammill DD (1990) On defining learning disabilities: an emerging consensus. J Learn Disabil 23:74–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cornoldi C (2007) (a cura di) Difficoltà e Disturbi dell’Apprendimento. Il Mulino, BolognaGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lin HC et al (2017) Continued use of an interactive computer game-based visual perception learning system in children with developmental delay. Int J Med Inform 107:76–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kim B, Park H, Baek Y (2009) Not just fun, but serious strategies: using meta-cognitive strategies in game-based learning. Comput Educ 52:800–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hwang GJ, Wu PH (2012) Advancements and trends in digital game-based learning research: a review of publications in selected journals from 2001 to 2010. Br J Educ Technol 43:E6–E10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Papastergiou M (2009) Digital game-based learning in high school computer science education: impact on educational effectiveness and student motivation. Comput Educ 52:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Prensky M (2003) Digital game-based learning. ACM Comput. Entertain 1:1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wynn K (1995) The origins of numerical knowledge. Math Cogn 1:35–60Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lucangeli D (2017) La discalculia e le difficoltà in aritmetica: Guida con workbook. Giunti EDU, FirenzeGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Molin A, Poli S, Lucangeli D (2007) BIN 4-6 Batteria per la valutazione dell’intelligenza numerica. Trento, EricksonGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gelman R, Gallistel CR (1978) The child’s understanding of number. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Puica N (2018) App and specific Leaning Disorders. Design, Develop and Experimentation of an App for the Discalculia, Degree thesis, University of FlorenceGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Denti M (2018) 1, 2, 3, Stella! App di ausilio al trattamento logopedico di bambini con difficoltà nei prerequisiti dell’area logico-matematica, Degree thesis, University of FlorenceGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
  17. 17.
  18. 18.
    Mossberg W (2007) Testing Out the iPhone. Wall Street JGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
  20. 20.
    REI lab- Academic laboratory at Design Campus University of Florence. https://www.dida.unifi.it/vp-234-laboratorio-reverse-engineering-and-interaction-design.html
  21. 21.
    Mace RL (1998) Designing for the 21st century: an international conference on universal design. Hofstra University, Hempstead, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bettye Rose Connell BR et al (1997) The principles of universal design, NC State University, The Center for Universal DesignGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Carroll JM (1999) Five reasons for scenario-based design. In: 32nd Hawaii international conference on system sciencesGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jordan PW (1997) Designing pleasurable products: an introduction to the new human factors. Taylor & Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Britton TA, LaSalle D, Cheng W (2003) Priceless: turning ordinary, the products of the extraordinary experiences. Zhongxin Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    ShiGuo L (2008) Experience and the challenge: product interaction design. Jiangsu Arts Press, NanjingGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Preece J, Rogers Y, Sharp H (2002) Human computer interaction would be beyond interactive. John Wiley & Sons, IncGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
  29. 29.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.DIDA DepartmentUniversity of FlorenceFlorenceItaly
  2. 2.Department of Mathematics and InformaticsUniversity of FlorenceFlorenceItaly
  3. 3.School of ArtsNanjing UniversityNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations