Advertisement

The Domestication Syndrome in Phaseolus Crop Plants: A Review of Two Key Domestication Traits

  • María Isabel Chacón-Sánchez
Chapter

Abstract

Plant domestication can be seen as a long-term experiment that involves a complex interplay among demographic processes and evolutionary forces. Long-standing questions about plant domestication are the number of times a species was domesticated, the extent of the domestication bottleneck, and the genetic basis of adaptive processes. Crops such as Phaseolus beans offer an excellent opportunity to answer these questions, especially the ones related to the genetic basis of the adaptive domestication syndrome. In the genus Phaseolus, five species have been domesticated: the common bean (P. vulgaris), the runner bean (P. coccineus), the tepary bean (P. acutifolius), the year bean (P. dumosus) and the Lima bean (P. Lunatus). These five species were domesticated in seven independent events that resulted in phenotypic convergence for several traits of the domestication syndrome. Two of these traits, namely reduced pod shattering and increased seed weight, are of special interest due to their role in the initial adaptation of these species during domestication. The objective of the present study was to review current evidence about (1) the effects of domestication on phenotypic variation of these two domestication traits in Phaseolus beans to understand whether adaptation led to clear-cut differences among wild and domestic forms or to a phenotypic continuum, and (2) the genetic basis of these two traits in Phaseolus beans to understand whether phenotypic convergence has been driven by parallel or convergent evolution. Research on these subjects in Phaseolus beans has been very scarce, and areas in need of urgent development are highlighted in this review.

Keywords

Pod shattering Seed weight Phenotypic convergence 

Notes

Funding

The present study was partially funded by Colciencias, Colombia, under contract number 009-2015 and project code 1101-658-42502.

Acknowledgements Thanks are due to the Genetic Resources Unit of CIAT, especially to Dr. Daniel Debouck and Dr. Peter Wenzl, for providing the Lima bean seed material used in this study and for all their support in the phenotypic characterization of pod shattering in Lima bean. Thanks are also due to Paola Hurtado for sharing unpublished pod shattering data in Lima bean.

References

  1. Abbo S, Pinhasi van-Oss R, Gopher A, Saranga Y, Ofner I, Peleg Z (2014) Plant domestication versus crop evolution: a conceptual framework for cereals and grain legumes. Trends Plant Sci 19:351–360Google Scholar
  2. Acosta-Gallegos JA, Kelly J, Gepts P (2007) Prebreeding in common bean and use of genetic diversity from wild germplasm. Crop Sci 47:S44–S59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andueza-Noh RH, Martínez-Castillo J, Chacón-Sánchez MI (2015) Domestication of small-seeded Lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus L.) landraces in Mesoamerica: evidence from microsatellite markers. Genetica 143:657–669CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Andueza-Noh RH, Serrano-Serrano ML, Sánchez MIC, del Pino IS, Camacho-Pérez L, Coello-Coello J, Cortes JM, Debouck DG, Martínez-Castillo J (2013) Multiple domestications of the Mesoamerican gene pool of Lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus L.): evidence from chloroplast DNA sequences. Genet Resour Crop Evol 60:1069–1086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beebe S, Rengifo J, Gaitan E, Duque MC, Tohme J (2001) Diversity and origin of Andean landraces of common bean. Crop Sci 41:854–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beebe S, Skroch PW, Tohme J, Duque MC, Pedraza F, Nienhuis J (2000) Structure of genetic diversity among common bean landraces of Middle American origin based on correspondence analysis of RAPD. Crop Sci 40:264–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bitocchi E, Bellucci E, Giardini A, Rau D, Rodriguez M, Biagetti E, Santilocchi R, Spagnoletti Zeuli P, Gioia T, Logozzo G, Attene G, Nanni L, Papa R (2012) Molecular analysis of the parallel domestication of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) in Mesoamerica and the Andes. New Phytol 197:300–313CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Blair MW, Iriarte G, Beebe S (2006) QTL analysis of yield traits in an advanced backcross population derived from a cultivated Andean × wild common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cross. Theor Appl Genet 112:1149–1163CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Blair MW, Pantoja W, Carmenza Muñoz L (2012) First use of microsatellite markers in a large collection of cultivated and wild accessions of tepary bean (Phaseolus acutifolius A. Gray). Theor Appl Genet 125:1137–1147CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Chacón S. MI, Pickersgill B, Debouck DG (2005) Domestication patterns in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and the origin of the Mesoamerican and Andean cultivated races. Theor Appl Genet 110:432–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chacón-Sánchez MI, Martínez-Castillo J (2017) Testing domestication scenarios of Lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus L.) in Mesoamerica: insights from genome-wide genetic markers. Front Plant Sci 8:1551CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Debouck DG, Toro O, Paredes OM, Johnson WC, Gepts P (1993) Genetic diversity and ecological distribution of Phaseolus vulgaris (Fabaceae) in northwestern South America. Econ Bot 47:408–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dong Y, Wang Y-Z (2015) Seed shattering: from models to crops. Front Plant Sci 6:476PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Dong Y, Yang X, Liu J, Wang B-H, Liu B-L, Wang Y-Z (2014) Pod shattering resistance associated with domestication is mediated by a NAC gene in soybean. Nat Commun 5:3352CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Estornell LH, Agustí J, Merelo P, Talón M, Tadeo FR (2013) Elucidating mechanisms underlying organ abscission. Plant Sci 199–200:48–60CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ferrándiz C, Liljegren SJ, Yanofsky MF (2000) Negative regulation of the SHATTERPROOF genes by FRUITFULL during arabidopsis fruit development. Science 289:436–438CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Freytag GF, Debouck DG (2002) Taxonomy, distribution, and ecology of the genus Phaseolus (Leguminosae–Papilionoideae) in North America, Mexico, and Central America. Botanical Research Institute, Fort Worth, TXGoogle Scholar
  18. Funatsuki H, Suzuki M, Hirose A, Inaba H, Yamada T, Hajika M, Komatsu K, Katayama T, Sayama T, Ishimoto M, Fujino K (2014) Molecular basis of a shattering resistance boosting global dissemination of soybean. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111:17797CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Gepts P, Bliss FA (1986) Phaseolin variability among wild and cultivated common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) from Colombia. Econ Bot 40:469–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gepts P, Debouck D (1991) Origin, domestication, and evolution of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris, L.). In: van Schoonhoven A, Voysest O (eds) Common beans: research for crop improvement. United Kingdom, Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux International, Wallingford, pp 7–53Google Scholar
  21. Gioia T, Logozzo G, Kami J, Spagnoletti Zeuli P, Gepts P (2013) Identification and characterization of a homologue to the Arabidopsis INDEHISCENT gene in common bean. J Hered 104:273–286CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Guerra-García A, Suárez-Atilano M, Mastretta-Yanes A, Delgado-Salinas A, Piñero D (2017) Domestication genomics of the open-pollinated scarlet runner bean (Phaseolus coccineus L.). Front Plant Sci 8:1891CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Gujaria-Verma N, Ramsay L, Sharpe AG, Sanderson L-A, Debouck DG, Tar’an B, Bett KE (2016) Gene-based SNP discovery in tepary bean (Phaseolus acutifolius) and common bean (P. vulgaris) for diversity analysis and comparative mapping. BMC Genomics 17:239Google Scholar
  24. Guzmán-Maldonado SH, Martínez O, Acosta-Gallegos JA, Guevara-Lara F, Paredes-López O (2003) Putative quantitative trait loci for physical and chemical components of common bean. Crop Sci 43:1029–1035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Harlan JR (1992) Crops & man, 2nd edn. American Society of Agronomy, Inc., Crop Science Society of America Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USAGoogle Scholar
  26. Koinange EMK, Singh SP, Gepts P (1996) Genetic control of the domestication syndrome in common bean. Crop Sci 36:1037–1045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kwak M, Gepts P (2009) Structure of genetic diversity in the two major gene pools of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L., Fabaceae). Theor Appl Genet 118:979–992CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Kwak M, Kami JA, Gepts P (2009) The putative Mesoamerican domestication center of Phaseolus vulgaris is located in the Lerma-Santiago Basin of Mexico. Crop Sci 49:554–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liljegren SJ, Ditta GS, Eshed Y, Savidge B, Bowman JL, Yanofsky MF (2000) SHATTERPROOF MADS-box genes control seed dispersal in Arabidopsis. Nature 404:766–770CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Liljegren SJ, Roeder AHK, Kempin SA, Gremski K, Østergaard L, Guimil S, Reyes DK, Yanofsky MF (2004) Control of fruit patterning in Arabidopsis by INDEHISCENT. Cell 116:843–853CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Meyer RS, Purugganan MD (2013) Evolution of crop species: genetics of domestication and diversification. Nat Rev Genet 14:840–852CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Mitsuda N, Ohme-Takagi M (2008) NAC transcription factors NST1 and NST3 regulate pod shattering in a partially redundant manner by promoting secondary wall formation after the establishment of tissue identity. Plant J 56:768–778CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Motta-Aldana JR, Serrano-Serrano ML, Hernández-Torres J, Castillo-Villamizar G, Debouck DG (2010) Multiple origins of Lima bean landraces in the Americas: evidence from chloroplast and nuclear DNA polymorphisms. Crop Sci 50:1773–1787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Murgia ML, Attene G, Rodriguez M, Bitocchi E, Bellucci E, Fois D, Nanni L, Gioia T, Albani DM, Papa R, Rau D (2017) A comprehensive phenotypic investigation of the “pod-shattering syndrome” in common bean. Front Plant Scie 8:251Google Scholar
  35. Nanni L, Bitocchi E, Bellucci E, Rossi M, Rau D, Attene G, Gepts P, Papa R (2011) Nucleotide diversity of a genomic sequence similar to SHATTERPROOF (PvSHP1) in domesticated and wild common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Theor Appl Genet 123:1341–1357CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Ogawa M, Kay P, Wilson S, Swain SM (2009) ARABIDOPSIS DEHISCENCE ZONE POLYGALACTURONASE1 (ADPG1), ADPG2, and QUARTET2 Are Polygalacturonases required for cell separation during reproductive development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 21:216CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Park SO, Coyne DP, Jung G, Skroch PW, Arnaud-Santana E, Steadman JR, Ariyarathne HM, Nienhuis J (2000) Mapping of QTL for seed size and shape traits in common bean. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 125:466–475Google Scholar
  38. Pickersgill B (2007) Domestication of plants in the Americas: insights from Mendelian and molecular genetics. Ann Bot 100:925–940CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Rajani S, Sundaresan V (2001) The Arabidopsis myc/bHLH gene ALCATRAZ enables cell separation in fruit dehiscence. Curr Biol 11:1914–1922CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Rodriguez M, Rau D, Angioi SA, Bellucci E, Bitocchi E, Nanni L, Knüpffer H, Negri V, Papa R, Attene G (2013) European Phaseolus coccineus L. landraces: population structure and adaptation, as revealed by cpSSRs and phenotypic analyses. PLoS ONE 8:e57337CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Schinkel C, Gepts P (1988) Phaseolin Diversity in the Tepary Bean, Phaseolus acutifolius A. Gray. Plant Breeding 101:292–301Google Scholar
  42. Schmit V, Debouck DG (1991) Observations on the origin of Phaseolus polyanthus Greenman. Econ Bot 45:345–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schmutz J, McClean PE, Mamidi S, Wu GA, Cannon SB, Grimwood J, Jenkins J, Shu S, Song Q, Chavarro C, Torres-Torres M, Geffroy V, Moghaddam SM, Gao D, Abernathy B, Barry K, Blair M, Brick MA, Chovatia M, Gepts P, Goodstein DM, Gonzales M, Hellsten U, Hyten DL, Jia G, Kelly JD, Kudrna D, Lee R, Richard MMS, Miklas PN, Osorno JM, Rodrigues J, Thareau V, Urrea CA, Wang M, Yu Y, Zhang M, Wing RA, Cregan PB, Rokhsar DS, Jackson SA (2014) A reference genome for common bean and genome-wide analysis of dual domestications. Nat Genet 46:707–713CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Serrano-Serrano ML, Hernández-Torres J, Castillo-Villamizar G, Debouck DG, Chacón Sánchez MI (2010) Gene pools in wild Lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus L.) from the Americas: evidences for an Andean origin and past migrations. Mol Phylogenet Evol 54:76–87CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Serrano-Serrano ML, Andueza-Noh RH, Martínez-Castillo J, Debouck DG, Chacón SMI (2012) Evolution and domestication of Lima bean in Mexico: evidence from ribosomal DNA. Crop Sci 52:1698–1712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Singh J, Gustin J, Baier J, Settles AM, Vallejos E (2014) Mapping QTLs for seed weight, starch and protein content in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). In: International plant and animal genome conference XXII San Diego, USAGoogle Scholar
  47. Singh SP, Gepts P, Debouck DG (1991) Races of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris, Fabaceae). Econ Bot 45:379–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Spataro G, Tiranti B, Arcaleni P, Bellucci E, Attene G, Papa R, Spagnoletti Zeuli P, Negri V (2011) Genetic diversity and structure of a worldwide collection of Phaseolus coccineus L. Theor Appl Genet 122:1281–1291CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Zohary D, Hopf M (2000) Domestication of plants in the Old World, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, New York, 316 ppGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Departamento de AgronomíaUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - BogotáBogotá, D.C.Colombia

Personalised recommendations