Advertisement

Neurologic Examination

  • Jack N. Alpert
Chapter

Abstract

Evaluation of the poorly responsive patient requires an organized approach. One aim of this chapter is to meticulously outline an examination technique, delineate the anatomic basis for the observed abnormal neurologic signs, review pertinent neurophysiology and, lastly, discuss the differential diagnosis. The differential diagnosis is formulated after answering a primary question. Does this patient have a focal lesion, multifocal lesions, or global cerebral dysfunction? This seemingly simple problem is often a formidable one.

Keywords

Neurologic examination Mental status Cranial nerves Motor function Gait Reflexes Sensation 

Supplementary material

Video 4.1

(MP4 1245579 kb)

Video 4.2

(MP4 1548747 kb)

Video 4.3

(MP4 1431644 kb)

Video 4.4

(MP4 1676644 kb)

Video 4.5

(MP4 1766370 kb)

Video 4.6

(MP4 1525598 kb)

Video 4.7

(MP4 1136522 kb)

Video 4.8

(MP4 1010256 kb)

Video 4.9

(MP4 1408205 kb)

Video 4.10

(MP4 1568411 kb)

Bibliography

  1. 1.
    Brain L. Speech Disorders 2nd ed. Washington: Butterworths; 1965.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hillis AE. Aphasia. Progress in the last quarter of a century. Neurology. 2007;69:200–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Weinstein EA, Prigatono GP, Schacter DL (ed.) Awareness of deficit after brain injury: clinical and theoretical issues. Oxford University Press: New York ; pp. 240–257. 1991.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Critchley M. The parietal lobes. New York: Hafner; 1966.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cockrell JR, Folstein MF. Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE). Psychopharm Bull. 1988;24:689–92.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Matthews BR. Rabinovici GD, Stephens ML and Pessih KL in Behavioral Neurology and Neuropsychiatry. Continuum Ed. JS Kass Volume 21 June 2015.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Digre KB, Corbett JJ. Practical viewing of the optic disc. Burlington: Butterworth Heinemann; 2003.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Glaser JS, editor. Neuro-ophthalmology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1999.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Walsh TJ. Visual fields. Examination and interpretation. San Francisco: American Academy of Ophthalmology; 1990.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brazis PW, Masdeu JC, Biller J. Localization in Clinical Neurology. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ross RT. How to examine the nervous system. 4th ed. Totowa: Humana; 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bender MB, editor. The oculomotor system. Hoebers Medical Division. New York: Harper & Row; 1964.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Furman JM, Cass SP. Balance disorders. A case study approach. Philadelphia: FA Davis; 1996.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Campbell WW. De Jong’s neurologic examination. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    DeGroot and Chusid. Correlative neuroanatomy. In: Appleton and Lange. New York, NY. 21st ed; 1991.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jack N. Alpert
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of NeurologyUniversity of Texas Medical, School at HoustonHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations