Advertisement

Discrimination and Prediction of Protein-Protein Binding Affinity Using Deep Learning Approach

  • Rahul Nikam
  • K. Yugandhar
  • M. Michael Gromiha
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10955)

Abstract

Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) mediate myriad biological functions. Estimating the binding affinity for PPIs help us to understand the underlying molecular recognition mechanism. In this work, we utilized deep learning approach to discriminate protein-protein complexes based on their binding affinity. We setup a database of 464 protein-protein complexes along with their experimental binding affinities and developed a deep learning based binary classification model, which showed an accuracy of 81.75% using 5-fold cross-validation. Furthermore, we refined the method for predicting the binding affinity of protein-protein complexes using a large set of complexes (PPA-Pred2). It could predict the binding affinity of the training set and blind test set with a mean absolute error of 1.24 kcal/mol and 1.31 kcal/mol, respectively. We suggest that our methods could serve as efficient tools to study PPIs and provide crucial insights about the underlying mechanism for the molecular recognition process.

Keywords

Protein-protein interaction Binding affinity Deep learning Machine learning 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Indian Institute of Technology Madras and the High-Performance Computing Environment (HPCE) for computational facilities. The work was partially supported by the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India (DST/INT/SWD/P-05/2016) and of the Swedish Research Council.

References

  1. 1.
    Bahadur, R.P., Chakrabarti, P., Rodier, F., Janin, J.: A dissection of specific and non-specific protein-protein interfaces. J. Mol. Biol. 336, 943–955 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yugandhar, K., Gromiha, M.M.: Analysis of protein-protein interaction networks based on binding affinity. Curr. Prot. Pept. Sci. 17, 72–81 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Moal, I.H., Agius, R., Bates, P.A.: Protein-protein binding affinity prediction on a diverse set of structures. Bioinformatics 27, 3002–3009 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yugandhar, K., Michael Gromiha, M.: Feature selection and classification of protein-protein complexes based on their binding affinities using machine learning approaches. Proteins 82(9), 2088–2096 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liu, Z., Li, Y., Han, L., Li, J., Liu, J., Zhao, Z., Nie, W., Liu, Y., Wang, R.: PDB-wide collection of binding data: current status of the PDBbind database. Bioinformatics 31, 405–412 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kastritis, P.L., Bonvin, A.M.J.J.: On the binding affinity of macromolecular interactions: daring to ask why proteins interact. J. R. Soc. Interface 10, 20120835 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen, J., Sawyer, N., Regan, L.: Protein-protein interactions: general trends in the relationship between binding affinity and interfacial buried surface area. Protein Sci. 22, 510–515 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lomax, J.E., Christopher, M.B., Chang, A., George, N.P.J.: Functional evolution of ribonuclease inhibitor: insights from birds and reptiles. J. Mol. Biol. 426, 3041–3056 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Spencer, A.L., Bagai, I., Becker, D.F., Zuiderweg, E.R., Ragsdale, S.W.: Protein-protein interactions in the mammalian heme degradation pathway heme oxygenase-2, cytochrome p450 reductase, and biliverdin reductase. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 29836–29858 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vreven, T., Iain, H.M., Anna, V., Brian, G.P.: Updates to the integrated protein-protein interaction benchmarks: docking benchmark version 5 and affinity benchmark version 2. J. Mol. Biol. 427, 3031–3041 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wang, G., Dunbrack, R.L.J.: PISCES: a protein sequence culling server. Bioinformatics 19, 1589–1591 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chollet, F.: “Keras” (2015)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Saraboji, K., Gromiha, M.M., Ponnuswamy, M.N.: Average assignment method for predicting the stability of protein mutants. Biopolymers 82, 80–92 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yugandhar, K., Michael Gromiha, M.: Protein-protein binding affinity prediction from the amino acid sequence. Bioinformatics 30, 3583–3589 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kawashima, S., Pokarowski, P., Pokarowska, M., Kolinski, A., Katayama, T., Kanehisa, M.: AAindex: amino acid index database, progress report 2008. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, D202–D205 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ofran, Y., Rost, B.: Interaction sites identified from sequence. Bioinformatics 23, e13–e16 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gromiha, M.M.: A statistical model for predicting protein folding rates from amino acid sequence with structural class information. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 45, 494–501 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gromiha, M.M., Saranya, N., Selvaraj, S., Jayaram, B., Fukui, K.: Sequence and structural features of binding site residues in protein-protein complexes: comparison with protein-nucleic acid complexes. Proteome Sci. 9, S13 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Li, W., Hamill, S.J., Hemmings, A.M., Moore, G.R., James, R., Kleanthous, C.: Dual recognition and the role of specificity-determining residues in colicin E9 DNase-immunity protein interactions. Biochemistry 37, 11771–11779 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Eathiraj, S., Pan, X., Ritacco, C., Lambright, D.G.: Structural basis of family-wide Rab GTPase recognition by rabenosyn-5. Nature 436, 415–419 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Maenaka, K., van der Merwe, P.A., Stuart, D.I., Jones, E.Y., Sondermann, P.: The human low affinity Fc receptors IIa, IIb, and IIIbind IgG with fast kinetics and distinct thermodynamic properties. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 44898–44904 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Blanco, M.A., Tatiana, P., Vincenzo, M., Mauro, M., Christopher, J.R.: Protein-protein interactions in dilute to concentrated solutions: α-Chymotrypsinogen in acidic conditions. J. Phys. Chem. B 118, 5817–5831 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biotechnology, Bhupat and Jyoti Metha School of BiosciencesIndian Institute of Technology MadrasChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations