Advertisement

Improving Initial Model Construction in Single Particle Cryo-EM by Filtering Out Low Quality Projection Images

  • Zhijuan Wang
  • Yonggang Lu
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10955)

Abstract

An important problem in the single-particle 3D reconstruction by cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) is to construct the initial model of a macromolecule from its 2D noisy projection images at unknown random orientations. The methods for initial model construction are often based on ‘‘Angular Reconstruction’’ that computes the directions of the projection images by establishing a coordinate system. However, it is difficult to obtain the projection angles of the projection images which have low signal-to-noise ratio. In this paper we propose a method to improve the initial model construction by filtering out low quality projection images. The projection angles are usually represented by Euler angles \( \upalpha \), \( \upbeta \) and \( {\upgamma } \). It is found that the quality of a projection image can be evaluated in the process of estimating its Euler angle \( {\upgamma} \). After the low quality projection images are removed, the rest of the projection images are used to construct the initial model in our method. Based on the synchronization method for initial model construction proposed by Yoel Shkolnisky, it is found that using the proposed filtering method can successfully improve the initial model construction. It is also found that filtering using Euler angle \( {\upgamma} \) estimation is better than filtering using good common line estimation in the initial model construction.

Keywords

Initial model construction 3D reconstruction Cryo-Electron Microscopy Common lines 

References

  1. 1.
    Nogales, E., Scheres, S.H.: Cryo-EM: a unique tool for the visualization of macromolecular complexity. Mol. Cell 58(4), 677–689 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nogales, E.: The development of cryo-EM into a mainstream structural biology technique. Nat. Methods 13(1), 24–27 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carroni, M., Saibil, H.R.: Cryo electron microscopy to determine the structure of macromolecularcomplexes. Methods 95, 78–85 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vinothkumar, K.R., Richard, H.: Single particle electron cryomicroscopy: trends, issues and future perspective. Q. Rev. Biophys. 49, e13 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cheng, Y.: Single-particle cryo-EM at crystallographic resolution. Cell 161(3), 450–457 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bai, X., McMullan, G., et al.: How cryo-EM is revolutionizing structural biology. Trends Biochem. Sci. 40(1), 49 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liu, Z., Gutierrez-Vargas, C., Wei, J., et al.: Determination of the ribosome structure to a resolution of 2.5 Å by single-particle cryo-EM. Protein Sci. 26(1), 82–92 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Penczek, P.A., Grassucci, R.A., Frank, J.: The ribosome at improved resolution: new techniques for merging and orientation refinement in 3D cryo-electron microscopy of biological particles. Ultramicroscopy 53, 251–270 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Elmlund, H., Elmlund, D., Bengio, S.: PRIME: probabilistic initial 3D model generation for single-particle cryo-electron microscopy. Structure 21(8), 1299–1306 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rosenthal, P.B., Rubinstein, J.L.: Validating maps from single particle electron cryomicroscopy. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 34, 135–144 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Henderson, R.: Avoiding the pitfalls of single particle cryo-electron microscopy: Einstein from noise. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 110(45), 18037 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lyumkis, D., Vinterbo, S., Potter, C.S., et al.: Optimod–an automated approach for constructing and optimizing initial models for single-particle electron microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 184(3), 417–426 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Van, H.M.: Angular reconstitution: a posteriori assignment of projection directions for 3D reconstruction. Ultramicroscopy 24(1), 111–123 (1987)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bracewell, R.N.: Strip integration in radio astronomy. Austr. J. Phys. 9, 198–217 (1956)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Penczek, P.A., Asturias, F.J.: Ab initio cryo-EM structure determination as a validation problem. In: IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, pp. 2090–2094. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shkolnisky, Y., Singer, A.: Viewing direction estimation in cryo-EM using synchronization. SIAM J. Imaging Sci. 5(3), 1088–1110 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Singer, A., Coifman, R.R., Sigworth, F.J., et al.: Detecting consistent common lines in cryo-EM by voting. J. Struct. Biol. 169(3), 312–322 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Van, M.H., Schatz, M.: Fourier shell correlation threshold criteria. J. Struct. Biol. 151(3), 250 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Information Science and EngineeringLanzhou UniversityLanzhouChina

Personalised recommendations