Advertisement

Borges and Nietzschean Ethics: Another Branch of Fantastic Literature?

  • Cesar RiveraEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Literatures of the Americas book series (LOA)

Abstract

This study maintains that Borges’s treatment of philosophy is not ironical or literarily reductionist with respect to one of its sub-disciplines: Ethics. In order to substantiate this thesis, Borges’s relation to Nietzsche from the 1930s to the 1950s is explored. The most important aspect of this relation, as will be seen in this study, is Borges’s serious reading of Nietzsche’s ethics, which can be contrasted to his playful, ironic and at times derisive attitude toward Nietzsche’s metaphysics and writing style. The significance of such a reading for this study is that it runs parallel to and overlaps with Borges’s repeated skirmishes with anti-Semites, fascists and other nationalists in both his fictions and non-fictions. It is in this context that his engagement with ethics can be appreciated.

Keywords

Nietzschean ethics Fantastic literature Metaphysics Fascism Anti-Semitism 

Works Cited

  1. Alazraki, Jaime. Borges and the Kabbalah: And Other Essays on his Fiction and Poetry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
  2. Barrenechea, Ana María. Borges: The Labyrinth Maker. New York: New York University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
  3. Bell, Michael. “Nietzsche, Borges, García Márquez on the Art of Memory and Forgetting.” The Romanic Review 98, no. 2/3 (March-May 2007): 122–134.Google Scholar
  4. Bloom, Harold. “Harold Bloom on the Irony Present in the Story.” In Bloom’s Major Short Story Writers, edited by Harold Bloom, 73–74. New York: Chelsea House, 2002.Google Scholar
  5. Borges, Jorge Luis. Collected Fictions: Jorge Luis Borges. Translated by Andrew Hurley. New York: Penguin, 1998.Google Scholar
  6. ———. Ficcionario: Una antología de sus textos. Edited by Emir Rodríguez Monegal. Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1998.Google Scholar
  7. ———. Labyrinths: Selected Stories and Other Writings. Edited by Donald A. Yates and James E. Irby. New York: New Directions, 1964.Google Scholar
  8. ———. “Nietzsche. El propósito de ‘Zarathustra.’” Nietzsche en castellano. www.nietzscheana.com.ar/borges_zaratustra.htm.
  9. ———. Obras Completas. Vol. 1. Buenos Aires: Emecé Editores, 2007.Google Scholar
  10. ———. Obras Completas. Vol. 4. Buenos Aires: Emecé Editores, 2007.Google Scholar
  11. ———. Selected Non-Fictions: Jorge Luis Borges. New York: Penguin Books, 1999.Google Scholar
  12. Borges, Jorge Luis, and Osvaldo Ferrari. En Diálogo. Vol. 2. Mexico: Siglo Veintiuno, 2005.Google Scholar
  13. Braunstein, Nestor. “Nietzsche, autor de Funes.” Istor 4, no. 14 (2003): 112–116.Google Scholar
  14. De Taro, Alfonso. “Borges and Postmodernity.” In Latin American Philosophy: Currents, Issues, Debates, edited by Eduardo Mendieta, 89–123. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
  15. Dennett, Daniel C. Darwin’s Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1996.Google Scholar
  16. González-Echevarría, Roberto, “Borges and Derrida.” In Modern Critical Views: Jorge Luis Borges, edited by Harold Bloom, 227–234. New York: Chelsea House, 1986.Google Scholar
  17. Gutiérrez-Mouat, Ricardo, “The Center of the Labyrinth.” In Modern Critical Views: Jorge Luis Borges, edited by Harold Bloom, 193–197. New York: Chelsea House, 1986.Google Scholar
  18. Harss, Luis, and Bárbara Dohmann. Into the Mainstream. Conversations with Latin-American Writers. New York: Harper & Row, Publishers, 1967.Google Scholar
  19. Kaufmann, Walter. Nietzsche: Philosopher, Psychologist, Antichrist. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  20. Knight, Deborah. “Intersections: Philosophy and Literature, or Why Ethical Criticism Prefers Realism.” In Literary Philosophers: Borges, Calvino, Eco, edited y Gracia, Jorge J.E., Carolyn Korsmeyer and Rodolphe Gasche, 15–26. London: Routledge, 2002.Google Scholar
  21. Kreimer, Roxanna. “Nietzsche, autor de ‘Funes el merorioso.’ Crítica al saber residual de la modernidad.” In Jorge Luis Borges. lntervenciones sobre pensamiento y literatura, edited by William Rowe, Claudio Canaparo and Annick Louis, 189–197. Buenos Aires: Paidos, 2000.Google Scholar
  22. Kristal, Efraín. Invisible Work: Borges and Translation. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
  23. Lange-Churión, Pedro. “Neobaroque: Latin America’s Postmodernity?” In Latin America and Postmodernity: A Contemporary Reader, edited by Pedro Lange-Churión and Eduardo Mendieta. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books, 2001.Google Scholar
  24. Mills, R.S. “The Theme of Skepticism in Borges’s ‘Tlön, Uqbar, Orbis Tertius.’” In Studies in Modern Spanish Literature and Art, edited by Nigel Glendinning, 127–138. London: Tamesis, 1972.Google Scholar
  25. Missana, Sergio. La máquina de pensar de Borges. Santiago: LOM, 2003.Google Scholar
  26. Nietzsche, Friedrich. Basic Writings of Nietzsche. New York: Modern Library, 2000a.Google Scholar
  27. Nietzsche, Friedrich. “Beyond Good and Evil.” In Basic Writings of Nietzsche, by Friedrich Nietzsche, 179–435. New York: The Modern Library, 2000b.Google Scholar
  28. ———. Ecce homo. Madrid: Alianza Editorial, 2001.Google Scholar
  29. ———. On Truth and Lies in a Nonmoral Sense. http://fInietzsche.holtof.com/Nietzsche_various/on_truth_and_lies.htm.
  30. ———. The Gay Science. Translated by Walter Kaufmann. New York: Random House, 1974.Google Scholar
  31. ———. The Portable Nietzsche. New York: Penguin Books, 1976.Google Scholar
  32. ———. Thus Spoke Zarathustra: A Book for None and All. Translated by Walter Kaufmann. New York: Viking Penguin, 1978.Google Scholar
  33. Núñez-Faraco, Humberto. Borges and Dante. Echoes of a Literary Friendship. N.p.: Peter Lang, 2006.Google Scholar
  34. Nuño, Juan. La filosofía de Borges. Mexico, D.F.: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1986.Google Scholar
  35. Oviedo, José Manuel. “El estatuto borgiano.” La Jornada Semanal. Junio 16, 1996. https://www.jornada.unam.mx.1996/06/16/sem-oviedo.html.Google Scholar
  36. Piglia, Ricardo. Crítica y ficción. Barcelona: Anagrama, 2001.Google Scholar
  37. ———. Respiración artificial. Barcelona: Anagrama, 2001.Google Scholar
  38. Read, Malcolm K. Jorge Luis Borges and his Predecessors. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press, 1993.Google Scholar
  39. Rest, Jaime. “Borges, Mauthner y la filosofía.” In Historia y crítica de la literatura hispanoamericana, edited by Cedomil Goic, 3:336–340. Barcelona: Editorial Crítica, 1988.Google Scholar
  40. ———. El laberinto del universo. Borges y el pensamiento nominalista. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Librerías Fausto, 1976.Google Scholar
  41. Rincón, Carlos. “La pregunta por la filosofía en Borges.” In Borges, lo sugerido y lo no dicho, by Carlos Rincón and Julián Serna Arango, 57–75. Bogotá: Siglo del Hombre Editores, 2004.Google Scholar
  42. Rodríguez Monegal, Emir, Enrico Mario Santi, and Carlos J. Alonso. “Borges and Politics.” Diacritics 8, no. 4 (Winter 1978): 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sabato, Ernesto. Tres aproximaciones a la literatura de nuestro tiempo. Buenos Aires: Editorial Alfa, 1974.Google Scholar
  44. Sarlo, Beatriz. Borges, un escritor en las orillas. Buenos Aires: Ariel, 1998.Google Scholar
  45. Seines, Giles. “Borges, Nietzsche, Cantor: Narratives of Influence.” http://www.lehman.cuny.edu/ciberletras/v06/selnes.html.
  46. Stavans, Ilan. “A Comment on Borges’s response to Hitler.” Modern Judaism, no. 23 (2003): 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Williamson, Edwin. Borges, a Life. New York: Viking, 2004.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyEl Paso Community CollegeEl PasoUSA

Personalised recommendations