Advertisement

The Effect of Nutrients and N:P Ratio on Microbial Communities: Testing the Growth Rate Hypothesis and Its Extensions in Lagunita Pond (Churince)

  • James Elser
  • Jordan Okie
  • Zarraz Lee
  • Valeria Souza
Chapter
Part of the Cuatro Ciénegas Basin: An Endangered Hyperdiverse Oasis book series (CUCIBA)

Abstract

The absolute and relative supplies of nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus can affect ecosystem properties and microbial biodiversity. More recently, the theory of biological stoichiometry has advanced connections between ecosystem ecology and cellular/molecular biology by proposing a link between biochemical features of microbial cells and their nutrient ratios. Specifically, the growth rate hypothesis (GRH) postulates that cellular stoichiometry varies according to growth rate due to increased allocation to P-rich ribosomal RNA to support rapid growth. Expanding on the GRH, it is predicted that microbes have a suite of genomic features that determine the ability to achieve rapid growth and, hence, influence biomass N:P. These genomic features include codon usage bias, number of rRNA and tRNA genes, and genome size, all of which have been individually linked to growth rate and fitness. This chapter discusses two experiments conducted at the Churince system in Lagunita pond to test the GRH. Churince is an ideal location for this because surface waters in this region have highly imbalanced N:P stoichiometry (TN:TP atomic ratio >100), where P is likely to be strongly limiting. The first experiment was a replicated in situ mesocosm experiment comparing three different nutrient treatments with varying N:P to a control treatment. The second experiment was a whole-pond perturbation, fertilizing with nutrients of N:P = 16 and using metagenomics to compare responses to replicated, internal control mesocosms. We discuss changes in microbial biomass N:P, species composition, and genomic features of the microbes in response to these perturbations of nutrient supplies and N:P.

Keywords

Churince system Growth rate hypothesis Phosphorus Nutrient stoichiometric ratios Ribosomal RNA 

References

  1. Condon C, Liveris D, Squires C et al (1995) Ribosomal RNA operon multiplicity in Escherichia coli and the physiological implications of rrn inactivation. J Bacteriol 177:4152–4156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Downing JA, McCauley E (1992) The nitrogen: phosphorus relationship in lakes. Limnol Oceanogr 37:936–945.  https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1992.37.5.0936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Elliott TA, Gregory TR (2015) What’s in a genome? The C-value enigma and the evolution of eukaryotic genome content. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 370(1678):20140331.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0331CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Elser JJ, Dobberfuhl DR, MacKay NA et al (1996) Organism size, life history, and N:P stoichiometry. Bioscience 46:674–684.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1312897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Elser JJ, O’Brien J, Dobberfuhl DR (2000a) The evolution of ecosystem processes: growth rate and elemental stoichiometry of a key herbivore in temperate and arctic habitats. J Evol Biol 13:845–853.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1420-9101.2000.00215.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Elser JJ, Sterner RW, Gorokhova E et al (2000b) Biological stoichiometry from genes to ecosystems. Ecol Lett 3:540–550.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2000.00185.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Elser JJ, Schampel JH, Garcia-Pichel F et al (2005a) Effects of phosphorus enrichment and grazing snails on modern stromatolitic microbial communities. Freshw Biol 50:1808–1825.  https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1365-2427.2005.01451.XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Elser JJ, Schampel JH, Kyle M et al (2005b) Response of grazing snails to phosphorus enrichment of modern stromatolitic microbial communities. Freshw Biol 50:1826–1835.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2005.01453.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Elser JJ, Bracken MES, Cleland EE et al (2007) Global analysis of nitrogen and phosphorus limitation of primary producers in freshwater, marine and terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol Lett 10:1135–1142.  https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1461-0248.2007.01113.XCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Elser JJ, Acquisti C, Kumar S (2011) Stoichiogenomics: the evolutionary ecology of macromolecular elemental composition. Trends Ecol Evol 26:38–44  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2010.10.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fagan WF, Siemann E, Mitter C et al (2002) Nitrogen in insects: implications for trophic complexity and species diversification. Am Nat 160:784–802.  https://doi.org/10.1086/343879CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Fu R, Gong J (2017) Single cell analysis linking ribosomal (r)DNA and rRNA copy numbers to cell size and growth rate provides insights into molecular protistan ecology. J Eukaryot Microbiol 64:885–896.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jeu.12425CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Gyorfy Z, Draskovits G, Vernyik V et al (2015) Engineered ribosomal RNA operon copy-number variants of E. coli reveal the evolutionary trade-offs shaping rRNA operon number. Nucleic Acids Res 43:1783–1794.  https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv040CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Hartman WH, Ye R, Horwath WR et al (2017) A genomic perspective on stoichiometric regulation of soil carbon cycling. ISME J 11:2652–2665.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2017.115CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Hessen DO, Elser JJ, Sterner RW et al (2013) Ecological stoichiometry: an elementary approach using basic principles. Limnol Oceanogr 58:2219–2236.  https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2013.58.6.2219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Klappenbach JA, Dunbar JM, Schmidt TM (2000) rRNA operon copy number reflects ecological strategies of bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:1328–1333.  https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.66.4.1328-1333.2000CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Lauro FM, McDougald D, Thomas T et al (2009) The genomic basis of trophic strategy in marine bacteria. PNAS 106:15527–15533.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0903507106CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Lee ZM-P, Bussema C, Schmidt TM (2009) rrnDB: documenting the number of rRNA and tRNA genes in bacteria and archaea. Nucleic Acids Res 37(Suppl 1):D489–D493.  https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn689CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee ZM, Steger L, Corman JR et al (2015) Response of a stoichiometrically imbalanced ecosystem to manipulation of nutrient supplies and ratios. PLoS One 10(4):e0123949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lee ZM-P, Poret-Peterson AT, Siefert JL et al (2017) Nutrient stoichiometry shapes microbial community structure in an evaporitic shallow pond. Front Microbiol 8:949.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00949CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Maeda M, Shimada T, Ishihama A (2016) Strength and regulation of seven rRNA promoters in Escherichia coli. PLoS One 10(12):e0144697.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nemergut DR, Knelman JE, Ferrenberg S et al (2016) Decreases in average bacterial community rRNA operon copy number during succession. ISME J 10:1147–1156.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2015.191CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Paul BJ, Ross W, Gaal T, Gourse RL (2004) rRNA transcription in Escherichia coli. Annu Rev Genet 38:749–770.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genet.38.072902.091347CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Pianka ER (1972) r and K selection or b and d selection? Am Nat 106:581–588.  https://doi.org/10.1086/282798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Prokopowich CD, Gregory TR, Crease TJ (2003) The correlation between rDNA copy number and genome size in eukaryotes. Genome 46:48–50.  https://doi.org/10.1139/g02-103CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Rocha EPC (2004) Codon usage bias from tRNA’s point of view: redundancy, specialization, and efficient decoding for translation optimization. Genome Res 14:2279–2286.  https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.2896904CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Roller BRK, Stoddard SF, Schmidt TM (2016) Exploiting rRNA operon copy number to investigate bacterial reproductive strategies. Nat Microbiol 1:16160.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.160CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Vieira-Silva S, Rocha EPC (2010) The systemic imprint of growth and its uses in ecological (meta)genomics. PLoS Genet 6(1):e1000808.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000808CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Wagner R (1994) The regulation of ribosomal RNA synthesis and bacterial cell growth. Arch Microbiol 161:100–109.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00276469CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Woods HA, Fagan WF, Elser JJ et al (2004) Allometric and phylogenetic variation in insect phosphorus content. Funct Ecol 18:103–109.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2004.00823.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yano K, Wada T, Suzuki S et al (2013) Multiple rRNA operons are essential for efficient cell growth and sporulation as well as outgrowth in Bacillus subtilis. Microbiology 159:2225–2236.  https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.067025-0CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • James Elser
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jordan Okie
    • 1
  • Zarraz Lee
    • 1
  • Valeria Souza
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Life SciencesArizona State UniversityTempeUSA
  2. 2.Flathead Lake Biological StationUniversity of MontanaPolsonUSA
  3. 3.Departamento de Ecología EvolutivaInstituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoCoyoacanMexico

Personalised recommendations