Advertisement

Characteristics of Excavation-Induced Deformation Associated with Different Propped Retaining Walls in Soft Soil

  • Nian-wu Liu
  • Feng Yu
  • Xiao-nan Gong
Conference paper
Part of the Sustainable Civil Infrastructures book series (SUCI)

Abstract

This paper reports the field performance of deep excavation of two subway-station cases, including the lateral wall deflection and the settlements of surrounding soil. The involved retaining structures were contiguous pile wall (CPW), soil-mixing wall (SMW) and diaphragm wall (DW), all embedded in soft clay. The profile of the measured wall deflections showed a typical bulging type at the end of the excavation. The ratios of the measured maximum wall deflection to the excavation depth were found to be similar among the three types of retaining walls. The relationship between the normalized maximum wall deflection and the factor of safety was described. The observed maximum deflections of the retaining walls were generally around the lower bound proposed by existing findings. This may be attributed to the use of prestressed struts and the short horizontal span of the excavation. The measured settlement of ground surface increased linearly with the increasing maximum lateral wall deflection; meanwhile, the magnitude of settlement became extraordinarily large due to the presence of sludgy soil. A concave pattern was proposed for the surface settlement profiles for the three types of retaining walls. The concave-pattern profiles were proposed for the subsurface settlement at the depths of 0, 5 and 10 m while the spandrel-pattern profiles were proposed at the depths of 15, 20 and 25 m. The critical depth derived from the concave-type to the spandrel-type was 63% of the excavation depth. As to the contiguous pile walls and the soil-mixing walls, the scopes of the involved area influenced by excavation were different.

Keywords

Field test Excavation Site investigation Soft soil 

Notations

He

Excavation depth

L

Distance from the excavation corner

x

Distance from the retaining wall

δhm

Maximum wall deflection

δvm

Maximum ground surface settlement

δv

Ground surface settlement

δh

Wall deflection

Hw

Depth of wall

hn

The spacing of the struts

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the funding supports from the research fund for commonwealth-orientated technology of Zhejiang Province (No. 2016C33020), the national natural science foundation of China (No. 51608485) and Zhejiang provincial natural science foundation (No. LZ17E080002), China. Great appreciation goes to the editorial board and the reviewers of this paper.

References

  1. Bjerrum, L., Eide, O.: Stability of strutted excavations in clay. Géotechnique 6(1), 32–47 (1956)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bono, N.A., Liu, T.K., Soydemir, C.: Performance of an internally braced slurry-diaphragm wall for excavation support. In: Paul, D.B., Davidson, R.R., Cavalli, N.J. (eds.) Slurry Wall: Design, Construction and Quality Control, pp. 347–360. ASTM, Philadelphia (1992)Google Scholar
  3. Clough, G.W., O’Rourke, T.D.: Construction induced movements of in situ walls. In: Lambe, P., Hansen, L.A. (eds.) Design and Performance of Earth Retaining Walls, pp. 439–470. ASCE, New York (1990)Google Scholar
  4. Finno, R.J., Bryson, L.S.: Response of a building adjacent to stiff excavation support system in soft clay. J. Perform. Constructed Facil. 16(1), 10–20 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Finno, R.J., Calvello, M.: Supported excavations: the observational method and inverse modeling. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 131(7), 826–836 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Finno, R.J., Bryson, L.S., Calvello, M.: Performance of a stiff support system in soft clay. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 128(8), 660–671 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Finno, R.J., Blackburn, J.T., Roboski, J.F.: Three-dimensional effects for supported excavations in clay. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 133(1), 30–36 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hashash, Y.M.A., Whittle, A.J.: Ground movement prediction for deep excavations in soft clay. J. Geotech. Eng. 122(6), 474–486 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hsieh, P.G., Ou, C.Y.: Shape of ground surface settlement profiles caused by excavation. Can. Geotech. J. 35(6), 1004–1017 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lee, F.H., Yong, K.Y., Quan, K.C.N., Chee, K.T.: Effect of corners in strutted excavations: field monitoring and case histories. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 124(4), 339–349 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Leung, E.H.Y., Ng, C.W.W.: Wall and ground movements associated with deep excavations supported by cast in situ wall in mixed ground conditions. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 133(2), 129–143 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Liu, G.B., Ng, C.W.W., Wan, Z.W.: Observed performance of a deep multistrutted excavation in Shanghai soft clays. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 131(8), 1004–1013 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Long, M.: Database for retaining wall and ground movements due to deep excavations. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 127(3), 203–224 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mana, A.I., Clough, G.W.: Prediction of movements for braced cut in clay. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 107(6), 759–777 (1981)Google Scholar
  15. Moormann, C.: Analysis of wall and ground movements due to deep excavation in soft soils based on a new worldwide database. Soils Found. 44(1), 87–98 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ou, C.Y., Hsieh, P.G., Chiou, D.C.: Characteristics of ground surface settlement during excavation. Can. Geotech. J. 30(5), 758–767 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ou, C.Y., Liao, J.T., Lin, H.D.: Performance of diaphragm wall constructed using top-down method. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 124(9), 798–808 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ou, C.Y., Liao, J.T., Cheng, W.L.: Building response and ground movements induced by a deep excavation. Géotechnique 50(3), 209–220 (2000a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ou, C.Y., Shiau, B.Y., Wang, I.W.: Three-dimensional deformation behavior of the Taipei National Enterprise Center (TNEC) excavation case history. Can. Geotech. J. 37(2), 438–448 (2000b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Peck, R.B.: Deep excavation & tunneling in soft ground. State-of-the-art-report. In: Proceeding of 7th International Conference of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, ISSMGE, Mexico City, pp. 225–281 (1969)Google Scholar
  21. Schuster, M., Kung, G.T.C., Juang, C.H., Hashash, Y.M.A.: Simplified model for evaluating damage potential of buildings adjacent to a braced excavation. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 135(12), 1823–1835 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tan, Y., Wei, B.: Performance of an overexcavated metro station and facilities nearby. J. Perform. Constructed Facil. 26(3), 241–254 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wang, Z.W., Ng, C.W.W., Liu, G.B.: Characteristics of wall deflections and ground surface settlements in Shanghai. Can. Geotech. J. 42(5), 1243–1254 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wang, J.H., Xu, Z.H., Wang, W.D.: Wall and ground movements due to deep excavations in Shanghai soft soils. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 136(7), 985–994 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Whittle, A.J., DeGroot, D.J., Ladd, C.C., Seah, T.H.: Model prediction of anisotropic behavior of Boston blue clay. J. Geotech. Eng. 120(1), 199–224 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wong, L.W., Patron, B.C.: Settlements induced by deep excavations in Taipei. In: Proceedings of 11th Southeast Asian Geotechnical Conference, Singapore, pp. 787–791. The Institution of Engineers, Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur (1993)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Civil Engineering and ArchitectureZhejiang Sci-Tech UniversityHangzhouChina
  2. 2.Research Center of Coastal Urban Geotechnical EngineeringZhejiang UniversityHangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations