Advertisement

What Is Local Autonomy?

  • Andreas Ladner
  • Nicolas Keuffer
  • Harald Baldersheim
  • Nikos Hlepas
  • Pawel Swianiewicz
  • Kristof Steyvers
  • Carmen Navarro
Chapter
Part of the Governance and Public Management book series (GPM)

Abstract

The balance between local autonomy and central control is a perennial issue in the territorial organisation of states. Despite the importance of local autonomy, there is little theoretical convergence regarding the core elements of the concept, and a limited number of studies try to measure local autonomy comparatively. This volume aims at filling this gap. On the grounds of a theoretically rooted concept, we measure the autonomy of local government in 39 European countries over a time period of 25 years. After presenting the main research intentions of this volume and the key issues regarding local autonomy, this chapter discusses the underlying normative values and the origins of the concept. What are the different theoretical perspectives and various aspects apprehended by the various disciplinary approaches? We conclude that local autonomy definitely is a multidimensional concept.

Keywords

Local autonomy Local government Decentralisation reforms Normative rationales Multidimensional concept 

References

  1. Andrews, C. W., & de Vries, M. S. (2007). High Expectations, Varying Outcomes: Decentralization and Participation in Brazil, Japan, Russia and Sweden. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 73(3), 424–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bentham, J. (1970). Of Laws in General. London: The Athlone Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bergvall, D., Merk, O., Kraan, D.-J., & Charbit, C. (2006). Intergovernmental Transfers and Decentralised Public Spending. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 5(4), 111–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blair, P. (1991). Trends in Local Autonomy and Democracy: Reflections from a European Perspective. In R. Batley & G. Stoker (Eds.), Local Government in Europe (pp. 41–57). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blöchliger, H. (2013). Measuring Decentralisation: The OECD Fiscal Decentralisation Database. In J. Kim, J. Lotz, & H. Blöchliger (Eds.), Measuring Fiscal Decentralisation. Concepts and Policies (pp. 15–35). Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, M. P. (1992). The Possibility of Local Autonomy. Urban Geography, 13(3), 257–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buchanan, J. M. (1950). Federalism and Fiscal Equity. The American Economic Review, 40(4), 583–599.Google Scholar
  8. Council of Europe. (2016). Comparative Analysis on the Implementation of the European Charter of Local Self-Government in 47 Member States on the Basis of the Adopted Congress Recommendations on Local and Regional Democracy in Member States, Monitoring Committee, Congress of Local and Regional Authorities.Google Scholar
  9. CEMR (Council of European Municipalities and Regions). (2012). Subnational Public Finance in the European Union. Dexia Crédit Local, Council of European Municipalities and Regions.Google Scholar
  10. Chandler, J. A. (2008). Liberal Justifications for Local Government in Britain. The Triumph of Expediency over Ethics. Political Studies, 56(2), 355–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chandler, J. A. (2010). A Rationale for Local Government. Local Government Studies, 36(1), 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chapman, J. L. (2003). Local Government Autonomy and Fiscal Stress: The Case of California Counties. State and Local Government Review, 35(1), 15–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clark, G. L. (1984). A Theory of Local Autonomy. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 74(2), 195–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Council of Europe. (1985). European Charter of Local Self-Government. (n°122). Retrieved from http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/122.htm. Consulted in 2018.
  15. Council of Europe. (1994). Definition and Limits of the Principle of Subsidiarity. Local and Regional Authorities, 55.Google Scholar
  16. Dahl, R. A., & Tufte, E. R. (1973). Size and Democracy. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. De Tocqueville, A. (1994 [1835]). Democracy in America. London: Fontana Press.Google Scholar
  18. DeFilippis, J. (1999). Alternatives to the ‘New Urban Politics’: Finding Locality and Autonomy in Local Economic Development. Political Geography, 18(8), 973–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Denters, S. A. H., & Rose, L. E. (2005). Comparing Local Governance: Trends and Developments. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Denters, B., Ladner, A., Mouritzen, P. E., & Rose, L. E. (2016). Reforming Local Governments in Times of Crisis: Values and Expectations of Good Local Governance in Comparative Perspective. In S. Kuhlmann & G. Bouckaert (Eds.), Local Public Sector Reforms in Times of Crisis: National Trajectories and International Comparisons (pp. 333–353). London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Deschouwer, K. (2006). Political Parties as Multi-Level Organizations. In R. S. Katz & W. J. Crotty (Eds.), Handbook of Party Politics (pp. 291–300). London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Do Vale, H. F. (2015). Comparing and Measuring Subnational Autonomy Across Three Continents. Lex Localis, 13(3), 741–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Elazar, D. J. (1976). Federalism vs. Decentralization: The Drift from Authenticity. Publius, 6(4), 9–19.Google Scholar
  24. Evans, M. (2014). Democracy, Legitimacy and Local Government Electoral Reform. Local Government Studies, 40(1), 41–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. European Commission. (2014). Investment for Jobs and Growth. Promoting Development and Good Governance in EU Regions and Cities. Sixth Report on Economic, Social and Territorial Cohesion. Brussels: European Commission, Regional and Urban Policy.Google Scholar
  26. Fleurke, F., & Willemse, R. (2004). Approaches to Decentralization and Local Autonomy: A Critical Appraisal. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 26(4), 523–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fleurke, F., & Willemse, R. (2006). Measuring Local Autonomy: A Decision-Making Approach. Local Government Studies, 32(1), 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Goldsmith, M. (1990). Local Autonomy: Theory and Practice. In D. S. King & J. Pierre (Eds.), Challenges to Local Government (pp. 15–36). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  29. Goldsmith, M. (2002). Central Control Over Local Government – A Western European Comparison. Local Government Studies, 28(3), 91–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Goldsmith, M., & Newton, K. (1983). Central-Local Government Relations: The Irresistible Rise of Centralised Power. West European Politics, 6(4), 216–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Goldsmith, M., & Page, E. C. (2010). Changing Government Relations in Europe: From Localism to Intergovernmentalism. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gurr, T. R., & King, D. S. (1987). The State and the City. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hankla, C. (2009). When Is Fiscal Decentralization Good for Governance? Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 39(4), 632–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hansen, T., & Klausen, J. E. (2002). Between the Welfare State and Local Government Autonomy. Local Government Studies, 28(4), 47–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hesse, J. J., & Sharpe, L. J. (1991). Local Government in International Perspective: Some Comparative Observations. In J. J. Hesse (Ed.), Local Government and Urban Affairs in International Perspective (pp. 603–621). Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  36. Hooghe, L., Marks, G., Schakel, A. H., Osterkatz, S. C., Niedzwiecki, S., & Shair-Rosenfield, S. (2016). Measuring Regional Authority: A Postfunctionalist Theory of Governance (Vol. 1). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Hutchcroft, P. D. (2001). Centralization and Decentralization in Administration and Politics: Assessing Territorial Dimensions of Authority and Power. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 14(1), 23–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ivanyna, M., & Shah, A. (2014). How Close Is Your Government to Its People? Worldwide Indicators on Localization and Decentralization. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, 2013(38), 1–62.Google Scholar
  39. Kaiser, K. (2006). Decentralization Reforms. In A. Coudouel & S. Paternostro (Eds.), Analysing the Distributional Impact of Reforms (pp. 313–353). Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  40. Kersting, N., & Vetter, A. (2003). Reforming Local Government in Europe: Closing the Gap Between Democracy and Efficiency. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Keuffer, N. (2016). L’autonomie locale, un concept multidimensionnel: comment le définir, comment le mesurer et comment créer un indice d’autonomie locale comparatif. Revue Internationale De Politique Comparée, 23(4), 443–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Keuffer, N. (2018). Does Local Autonomy Facilitate Local Government Reform Initiatives? Evidence from Switzerland. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 31(4), 426–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. King, D. S., & Pierre, J. (1990). Introduction. In D. S. King & J. Pierre (Eds.), Challenges to Local Government (pp. 1–14). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  44. King, D., & Stoker, G. (1996). Rethinking Local Democracy. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kjellberg, F. (1995). The Changing Values of Local Government. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 540, 40–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kuhlmann, S., & Bogumil, J. (2010). Kommunalisierung, Regionalisierung, Kooperation – die “neue Welle” subnationaler Verwaltungsreform. In J. Bogumil & S. Kuhlmann (Eds.), Kommunale Aufgabenwahrnehmung im Wandel: Kommunalisierung, Regionalisierung und Territorialreform in Deutschland und Europa (pp. 11–22). Wiesbaden: VS Verlg für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  47. Kuhlmann, S., & Bouckaert, G. (2016). Local Public-Sector Reforms in Times of Crisis. National Trajectories and International Comparisons. Governance and Public Management. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kuhlmann, S., & Wollmann, H. (2014). Introduction to Comparative Public Administration: Administrative Systems and Reforms in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  49. Ladner, A. (2017). Autonomy and Austerity: Re-investing in Local Government. In C. Schwab, G. Bouckaert, & S. Kuhlmann (Eds.), The Future of Local Government in Europe. Lessons from Research and Practice in 31 Countries (pp. 23–52). Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co.Google Scholar
  50. Lake, R. W. (1994). Negotiating Local Autonomy. Political Geography, 13(5), 423–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lijphart, A. (1984). Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Democracies. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Loughlin, J. (2009). ‘The Hybrid State’: Reconfiguring Territorial Governance in Western Europe. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 10(1), 51–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Loughlin, J., Hendriks, F., & Lidström, A. (Eds.). (2011). The Oxford Handbook of Local and Regional Democracy in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Mackenzie, W. J. M. (1961). Theories of Local Government. London: London School of Economics.Google Scholar
  55. Marcou, G. (1999). L’autonomie des collectivités locales en Europe : fondements, formes et limites. In Les Entretiens de la Caisse des dépôts sur le développement local (pp. 31–83). Paris: Editions de l’Aube/SECPB.Google Scholar
  56. Mill, J. S. (1975 [1859]). Essay on Liberty. In R. Wollheim (Ed.), John Stuart Mill: Three Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Mueller, S. (2011). The Politics of Local Autonomy: Measuring Cantonal (De)centralisation in Switzerland. Space and Polity, 15(3), 213–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Musgrave, R. A. (1959). The Theory of Public Finance: A Study in Public Economy. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  59. Musgrave, R. A., & Musgrave, P. B. (1976). Public Finance in Theory and Practice. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  60. Oates, W. E. (1972). Fiscal Federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  61. Oates, W. E. (1990). Decentralization of the Public Sector. In R. J. Bennet (Ed.), Decentralization, Local Governments, and Markets: Towards a Post-Welfare Agenda (pp. 43–58). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  62. Oates, W. E. (1999). An Essay on Fiscal Federalism. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(3), 1120–1149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Oates, W. E. (2001). Property Taxation and Local Government Finance. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.Google Scholar
  64. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2004). Development Evaluation: Lessons Learned on Donor Support to Decentralisation and Local Governance, DAC Evaluation Series (pp. 1–83). Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  65. Page, E. (1982). The Value of Local Autonomy. Local Government Studies, 8(4), 21–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Page, E. (1991). Localism and Centralism in Europe: The Political and Legal Bases of Local Self-Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press on Demand.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (1998). Governance Without Government? Rethinking Public Administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(2), 223–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Pierre, J. (1990). Assessing Local Autonomy. In D. S. King & J. Pierre (Eds.), Challenges to Local Government (pp. 37–54). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  69. Pollitt, C. (2005). Decentralization: A Central Concept in Contemporary Public Management. In E. Ferlie, L. E. Lynn Jr., & C. Pollitt (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Management (pp. 371–397). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Pratchett, L. (2004). Local Autonomy, Local Democracy and the ‘New Localism’. Political Studies, 52, 358–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Prud’homme, R. (1994). On the Dangers of Decentralization. Policy Research Working Paper, 1252. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  72. Reddy, P., Nemec, J., & De Vries, M. (2015). The State of Local Government. Public Policy and Administration, 14(3), 160–176.Google Scholar
  73. Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The New Governance: Governing Without Government. Political Studies, XLIV, 652–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Riker, W. (1969). Six Books in Search of a Subject or Does Federalism Exist and Does It Matter. Comparative Politics, 2(1), 135–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Riker, W. (1975). Federalism. In F. I. Greenstein & N. W. Polsby (Eds.), Handbook of Political Science (pp. 93–172). Boston: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  76. Rodden, J. (2002). The Dilemma of Fiscal Federalism: Grants and Fiscal Performance Around the World. American Journal of Political Science, 46(3), 670–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Rodden, J. (2004). Comparative Federalism and Decentralization: On Meaning and Measurement. Comparative Politics, 36(4), 481–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Rodriguez-Pose, A., & Ezcurra, R. (2011). Is Fiscal Decentralization Harmful for Economic Growth? Evidence from the OECD Countries. Journal of Economic Geography, 11, 619–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Scharpf, F. W. (1970). Demokratietheorie zwischen Utopie und Anpassung. Konstanz: Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
  80. Scharpf, F. W. (1978). Die Theorie der Politikverflechtung: ein kurzgefasster Leitfaden. In J. J. Hesse (Ed.), Politikverflechtung im föderativen Staat. Studien zum Planungs- und Finanzierungsverbund zwischen Bund, Ländern und Gemeinden. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  81. Scharpf, F. W. (1999). Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Schneider, A. (2003). Decentralization: Conceptualization and Measurement. Studies in Comparative International Development, 38(3), 32–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Sellers, J. M., & Lidström, A. (2007). Decentralization, Local Government, and the Welfare State. Governance, 20(4), 609–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Sharpe, L. J. (1970). Theories and Values of Local Government. Political Studies, 18(2), 153–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Smith, T. (1951). Local Self-Government and Centralization. London: John Chapman.Google Scholar
  86. Swianiewicz, P. (2004). Local Government Borrowing: Risks and Rewards. Budapest: OSI/LGI.Google Scholar
  87. Swianiewicz, P. (2014). An Empirical Typology of Local Government Systems in Eastern Europe. Local Government Studies, 40(2), 292–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures. The Journal of Political Economy, 64(5), 416–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Treisman, D. (2007). The Architecture of Government: Rethinking Political Decentralization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Tsebelis, G. (1995). Decision Making in Political Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicameralism and Multipartyism. British Journal of Political Science, 25(3), 289–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. UCLG (United Cities and Local Governments). (2008). Decentralization and Local Democracy in the World. First Global Report by United Cities and Local Governments 2008. World Bank Publications.Google Scholar
  92. UN Habitat. (2009). International Guidelines on Decentralisation and Access to Basic Services for All. Nairobi: United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-HABITAT).Google Scholar
  93. van Kersbergen, K., & van Waarden, F. (2004). Governance’as a Bridge Between Disciplines: Cross-Disciplinary Inspiration Regarding Shifts in Governance and Problems of Governability, Accountability and Legitimacy. European Journal of Political Research, 43(2), 143–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Vetter, A. (2007). Local Politics: A Resource for Democracy in Western Europe? Local Autonomy, Local Integrative Capacity, and Citizens’ Attitudes Towards Politics (Vol. 3). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  95. Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  96. Wollmann, H. (2004). Local Government Reforms in Great Britain, Sweden, Germany and France. Between Multi-function and Single-Purpose Organisation. Local Government Studies, 30(4), 639–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Wolman, H., McManmon, R., Bell, M., & Brunori, D. (2010). Comparing Local Government Autonomy Across States. In M. E. Bell, D. Brunori, & J. Yougman (Eds.), The Property Tax and Local Autonomy (pp. 69–114). Washington, DC: National Tax Association.Google Scholar
  98. Wolman, H. (1990). Decentralization: What It Is and Why We Should Care. In R. J. Bennet (Ed.), Decentralization, Local Governments, and Markets: Towards a Post-Welfare Agenda (pp. 29–42). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  99. Wolman, H., & Goldsmith, M. (1990). Local Autonomy as a Meaningful Analytic Concept. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 26(1), 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Wolman, H., & Goldsmith, M. (1992). Urban Politics and Policy. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  101. Wolman, H., McManmon, R., Bell, M., & Brunori, D. (2010). Comparing Local Government Autonomy Across States. In M. E. Bell, D. Brunori, & J. Yougman (Eds.), The Property Tax and Local Autonomy (pp. 69–114). The Lincoln Institute.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andreas Ladner
    • 1
  • Nicolas Keuffer
    • 1
  • Harald Baldersheim
    • 2
  • Nikos Hlepas
    • 3
  • Pawel Swianiewicz
    • 4
  • Kristof Steyvers
    • 5
  • Carmen Navarro
    • 6
  1. 1.IDHEAPUniversity of LausanneLausanneSwitzerland
  2. 2.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
  3. 3.National and Kapodistrian University of AthensAthensGreece
  4. 4.Department of Local Development and Policy, Faculty of Geography and Regional StudiesUniversity of WarsawWarszawaPoland
  5. 5.Department of Political ScienceGhent UniversityGhentBelgium
  6. 6.Department of Political ScienceUniversidad Autónoma de MadridMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations