Advertisement

Mathematical Model for Determining Depth of Deformation Penetration While Pipe Punching

  • D. V. Perevozchikov
  • V. N. Yeremin
  • L. V. Radionova
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

This article speculates on the topic of inhomogeneity of crystal size in production of pipes with a diameter over 600 mm by means of punching and mechanical processing. It analyses literary data which allows to suggest that the reason for crystal inhomogeneity is inhomogeneity of deformation caused by voltage dissipation. There is a comparison of the punching process and mother pipe rolling on the stage of blooming where one can also observe voltage dissipation. It contains a conclusion stating similarity of these processes and suggests using the formula of Sun Rui Yu to evaluate the depth of deformation penetration on a piercing mill. There is an algorithm elaborated for usage of this formula requiring determination of a feed pitch. It should be noted that the given method suits only those mills where it is possible to ignore mother pipe twisting. The given method was used for calculating the depth of deformation penetration for one of the schedules. Possibilities and boundaries of method application are summarised.

Keywords

Pipe punching Depth of deformation penetration Inhomogeneity of deformation Inhomogeneity of crystals by size 

References

  1. 1.
    Zibel E (1939) General thoughts on process of transverse expansion. Pipe Production, KievGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Smirnov VS, Anisiforov VP, Vasilchikov MV et al (1957) Transverse rolling in mechanic industry. MASHGIZ, Moscow, p 375Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Johnson K (1989) Mechanics of contact interaction; translated from English by R.V. Goldstein. Mir, Moscow, p 510Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fomichev IA (1963) Transverse rolling. Metallurgizdat, Moscow, p 262Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Celikov AI (1962) Theory of force calculation for piercing mills. State Scientific and Technical Press for Ferrous and Nonferrous Metallurgy, Moscow, p 494Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Polukhin PI, Matveev UM, Vorontsov VK (1966) Peculiarities of plastic task solutions by means of optical method (on example of transverse rolling). Prod Weld Non-Weld Pipes Collect Work Metall 6(6):108–120Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Smirnov VS (1973) Theory of pressure metal treatment. Metallurgy, Moscow, p 496Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Voskanyanz AA, Ivanov AV (2002) Simulation of technological tasks on plasticity on the basis of Eulerian description of motion of a continuum. Roll Prod Manuf 7:10–13Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Voskanyanz AA, Ivanov AV (2010) Simulation of transverse rolling process on the basis of Eulerian description of motion of a continuum. Sci Educ 2:2–3. A Scientific Edition of the MSTU, N.E. BaumanGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Romanenko VP, Zolotarev AA, Sizov D (2013) Simulation of screw punching process of large diameter parts in two-roller mill by method of finite elements. Black Metall 3:60–64. News of Institutions of Higher EducationGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Romancev BA, Goncharuk AV, Vavilkin NM, Samusev SV (2011) Pipe production. MISIS Publishing House, Moscow, p 970Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chizhikov UM (1970) Similarity theory and simulation of pressure metal treatment processes. Metallurgy, Moscow, p 296Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Backofen WA (1977) Deformation processing; translated from English by Berkovsky VS and Ruzanov FI. Metallurgy, Moscow, p 288Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chekmaryov AP (1968) Theory of large slab rolling. Metallurgy, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Danilov FA, Gleiberg AZ, Balakin VG (1954) Steel pipe production by hot rolling. State Scientific and Technical Press for Ferrous and Nonferrous Metallurgy, Moscow, p 616Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chekmarev AP, Druyan VM (1976) The theory of pipe production. Metallurgy, Moscow, р 304  Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Teterin PK (1971) Theory of transverse rolling. Metallurgy, Moscow, p 368Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Perevozchikov DV, Eremin VN, Krutov NK (2017) Analysis of influence of part twisting on surface defect formation and deformation inhomogeneity in pipe production. SUSU Bull ‘Metall’ Ser 17(2):91–97Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Romancev BA, Goncharuk AV, Aleschenko AS, Krasilschikov MV (2012) Experimental studies of resulting metal twisting in punching on two-roller mill of transverse rolling. Black Metall 17(11):38–39. News of Institutions of Higher EducationGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Perevozchikov DV, Vasyuchkova KV (2017) Numerical strategy of calculating feed half pitch of part during pipe punching on transverse rolling mills. SUSU Bull ‘Metall’ Ser 18(3):92–98Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. V. Perevozchikov
    • 1
    • 2
  • V. N. Yeremin
    • 2
  • L. V. Radionova
    • 1
  1. 1.South Ural State UniversityChelyabinskRussia
  2. 2.Chelyabinsk Pipe-Rolling PlantChelyabinskRussia

Personalised recommendations